World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6252 5813 3383 3067 107 7001

Carol Magai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carol Magai between 1995 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carol Magai published across 23 years, from 1995 to 2017, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2002. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2002. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1995 2017

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carol Magai: publications per year, 1995 to 2017
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 4
1997 2
1998 3
1999 2
2000 2
2001 6
2002 17
2003 8
2004 13
2005 8
2006 11
2007 5
2008 9
2009 4
2010 5
2011 0
2012 6
2013 1
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

Carol Magai publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol Magai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Carol Magai D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol Magai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carol Magai is affiliated with Long Island University in the United States. Their academic profile does not list recent papers, specific main or subfields of study, or frequent publication venues. Similarly, there is no available information on frequent co-authors, book publications, or awards won.

The data indicates no specific research topics or fields directly associated with Carol Magai's work. Without details on publications or research focus areas, it is not possible to outline a precise scope of their research contributions or areas of expertise.

The absence of listed papers and collaborations suggests either a limited publicly documented research output or specialization in aspects of academia not captured in the available data set.

Further details regarding Carol Magai's academic career, research themes, or scholarly impact were not provided in the source data.

Best Publications

  • Fear, Anxiety, Worry, and Breast Cancer Screening Behavior: A Critical Review

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai;Yulia S Krivoshekova;Lynn Ryzewicz

  • Altruism Relates to Health in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Older Adults

    William Michael Brown;Nathan S. Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Moderators of the Emotion Inhibition-Health Relationship: A Review and Research Agenda:

    Nathan S. Consedine;Carol Magai;George A. Bonanno

  • Do parents respond in different ways when children feel different emotions? The emotional context of parenting.

    Colleen R. O'neal;Carol Magai

  • Emotion experience and expression across the adult life span: Insights from a multimodal assessment study.

    Carol Magai;Nathan S. Consedine;Yulia S. Krivoshekova;Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi

  • Attachment and emotion experience in later life: the view from emotions theory.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Attachment Styles in Older European American and African American Adults

    Carol Magai;Carl Cohen;Norweeta Milburn;Bevlyn Thorpe

  • Emotional Expression During Mid- to Late-Stage Dementia

    Carol Magai;Carl Cohen;David Gomberg;Chris Malatesta

  • Attachment Style and Emotion Regulation in Dementia Patients and their Relation to Caregiver Burden

    Carol Magai;Carl I. Cohen

  • A controlled clinical trial of sertraline in the treatment of depression in nursing home patients with late-stage Alzheimer's disease.

    Carol Magai;Gary Kennedy;Carl I. Cohen;David Gomberg

  • The contribution of emotional characteristics to breast cancer screening among women from six ethnic groups.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai;Alfred I Neugut

  • Impact of training dementia caregivers in sensitivity to nonverbal emotion signals.

    Carol Magai;Carl I. Cohen;David Gomberg

  • Ethnic differences in self-reported sleep problems in older adults

    G. Jean-Louis;C. M. Magai;C. I. Cohen;F. Zizi;F. Zizi

  • Adult attachment styles and emotional biases

    Unknown

  • The uncharted waters of emotion: ethnicity, trait emotion and emotion expression in older adults.

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Common psychosocial factors underlying breast cancer screening and breast cancer treatment adherence: a conceptual review and synthesis.

    Carol Magai;Nathan Consedine;Alfred I. Neugut;Dawn L. Hershman

  • Prostate cancer screening behavior in men from seven ethnic groups: the fear factor.

    Nathan S. Consedine;Amy H. Morgenstern;Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi;Carol Magai

  • Attachment in African American and European American older adults: the roles of early life socialization and religiosity.

    Diane P. F. Montague;Carol Magai;Nathan S. Consedine;Michael Gillespie

  • Diversity matters: Unique populations of women and breast cancer screening

    Carol Magai;Nathan Consedine;Francine Conway;Alfred Neugut

  • Time spent in the united states and breast cancer screening behaviors among ethnically diverse immigrant women: Evidence for acculturation?

    William Michael Brown;Nathan S. Consedine;Carol Magai

  • Ethnic Variation in the Impact of Negative Affect and Emotion Inhibition on the Health of Older Adults

    Nathan S Consedine;Carol Magai;Carl I Cohen;Michael Gillespie

Frequent Co-Authors

Nathan S. Consedine
Nathan S. Consedine University of Auckland
Alfred I. Neugut
Alfred I. Neugut Columbia University
Dawn L. Hershman
Dawn L. Hershman Columbia University
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Dana H. Bovbjerg
Dana H. Bovbjerg University of Pittsburgh
Christine B. Ambrosone
Christine B. Ambrosone Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Lawrence H. Kushi
Lawrence H. Kushi Kaiser Permanente
George A. Bonanno
George A. Bonanno Columbia University
Emanuela Taioli
Emanuela Taioli Mount Sinai Health System

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, particularly in social work. Many states in the USA have specific educational requirements for those pursuing roles in this important field.

For those aiming to become social workers, educational requirements differ depending on state regulations. For example, you can learn what is needed for the social worker degree requirements in North Carolina before making a decision. Similarly, understanding the North Dakota minimum degree requirement for social workers is essential for those planning to work in that region.

In Ohio, the path to a social work career also comes with its own set of criteria. See more about the Ohio minimum degree requirement for social workers. Prospective social workers in Oklahoma should check the relevant educational standards as well, by reviewing the social worker degree requirements in Oklahoma.

Whether you choose a psychology degree with a focus on clinical, counseling, or community practices, understanding these state-specific requirements can help you choose the right online program and career path.

Best Scientists Citing Carol Magai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles