World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
13242
World Ranking
2525
National Ranking
1461

Dana H. Bovbjerg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana H. Bovbjerg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 252 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dana H. Bovbjerg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dana H. Bovbjerg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dana H. Bovbjerg is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist has contributed to key topics such as cancer survivorship and care, childhood cancer survivors' quality of life, medication adherence and compliance, nutrition and health in aging, cancer-related cognitive impairment studies, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and brain metastases and treatment.

Frequent publication venues for Dana H. Bovbjerg include Cancer Research, JMIR Perioperative Medicine, Cancer, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, and Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Their contributions to these journals reflect a focus on oncology and related medical disciplines.

Recent notable papers include:

  • "A Real-Time Mobile Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior Before and After Cancer Surgery: Usability and Feasibility Study," 2020, JMIR Perioperative Medicine
  • "Glucocorticoid resistance and β2-adrenergic receptor signaling pathways promote peripheral pro-inflammatory conditions associated with chronic psychological stress: A systematic review across species," 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Rates and Predictors of Nonadherence to the Post-Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Medical Regimen in Patients and Caregivers," 2021, Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
  • "A prospective study of the use of central venous catheters in patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia treated with induction chemotherapy," 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer
  • "A Real-Time Mobile Intervention to Reduce Sedentary Behavior Before and After Cancer Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial," 2022, JMIR Perioperative Medicine

Their collaborative research network includes several frequent coauthors, highlighting interdisciplinary efforts within medical research. Among these are Jessica Manculich, Donna M. Posluszny, Rebecca A. Shelby, Anna L. Marsland, and Carissa A. Low.

Best Publications

  • Cancer-related fatigue: a systematic and meta-analytic review of non-pharmacological therapies for cancer patients.

    Maria Kangas;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Guy H. Montgomery

  • The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis with surgical patients: a meta-analysis.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Daniel David;Gary Winkel;Jeffrey H. Silverstein

  • A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Brief Hypnosis Intervention to Control Side Effects in Breast Surgery Patients

    Guy H. Montgomery;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Julie B. Schnur;Daniel David

  • Imagery in human classical conditioning.

    Mark R. Dadds;Dana H. Bovbjerg;William H. Redd;Tim R. H. Cutmore

  • Experiences of racist events are associated with negative health consequences for African American women.

    Naa Oyo A. Kwate;Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir;Josephine S. Guevarra;Dana H. Bovbjerg

  • Brief presurgery hypnosis reduces distress and pain in excisional breast biopsy patients

    Guy H. Montgomery;Christina R. Weltz;Megan Seltz;Dana H. Bovbjerg

  • Persistent postmastectomy pain in breast cancer survivors: analysis of clinical, demographic, and psychosocial factors.

    Inna Belfer;Kristin L. Schreiber;John R. Shaffer;Helen Shnol

  • Presurgery distress and specific response expectancies predict postsurgery outcomes in surgery patients confronting breast cancer.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Dana H. Bovbjerg

  • Persistent pain in postmastectomy patients: Comparison of psychophysical, medical, surgical, and psychosocial characteristics between patients with and without pain

    Kristin L. Schreiber;Marc O. Martel;Helen Shnol;John R. Shaffer

  • Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer

    Sandra G. Zakowski;Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Patrick Borgen

  • Psychosocial Predictors of BRCA Counseling and Testing Decisions among Urban African-American Women

    Hayley S. Thompson;Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir;Chantal Duteau-Buck;Josephine Guevarra

  • Intrusive thoughts and psychological distress among breast cancer survivors: global meaning as a possible protective factor.

    Suzanne M. Johnson Vickberg;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Katherine N. DuHamel;Violante Currie

  • Development of common cold symptoms following experimental rhinovirus infection is related to prior stressful life events.

    Arthur A. Stone;Dana H. Bovbjerg;John M. Neale;Anthony Napoli

  • Influence of psychological stress on upper respiratory infection--a meta-analysis of prospective studies.

    Anette Pedersen;Robert Zachariae;Dana H. Bovbjerg

  • Social support, intrusive thoughts, and quality of life in breast cancer survivors.

    Julie A. Lewis;Sharon L. Manne;Katherine N. DuHamel;Suzanne M. Johnson Vickburg

  • Relations between coping responses and optimism-pessimism in predicting anticipatory psychological distress in surgical breast cancer patients.

    Daniel David;Guy H. Montgomery;Dana H. Bovbjerg

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of a Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Plus Hypnosis Intervention to Control Fatigue in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

    Guy H. Montgomery;Daniel David;Maria Kangas;Sheryl Green

  • Fatigue during breast cancer radiotherapy: an initial randomized study of cognitive-behavioral therapy plus hypnosis.

    Guy H. Montgomery;Maria Kangas;Daniel David;Michael N. Hallquist

  • Psychological distress in women with a familial risk of breast cancer

    Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir;Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Dana H. Bovbjerg;Kathryn M. Kash;Kathryn M. Kash;Jimmie C. Holland;Jimmie C. Holland

  • Presurgery Psychological Factors Predict Pain, Nausea, and Fatigue One Week After Breast Cancer Surgery

    Guy H. Montgomery;Julie B. Schnur;Joel Erblich;Michael A. Diefenbach

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy H. Montgomery
Guy H. Montgomery Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir
Heiddis B. Valdimarsdottir Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Christine B. Ambrosone
Christine B. Ambrosone Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Elisa V. Bandera
Elisa V. Bandera Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Alfred I. Neugut
Alfred I. Neugut Columbia University
Daniel David
Daniel David Babeș-Bolyai University
William H. Redd
William H. Redd Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh
Lawrence H. Kushi
Lawrence H. Kushi Kaiser Permanente
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to various online degrees and career opportunities. With the increasing demand for flexibility, many students are turning to online psychology programs in USA that fit their schedules and personal needs.

The choices vary by state and institution. For example, students interested in regional options may want to review the online psychology degrees in Texas or explore the best online psychology degree programs ranking in Wisconsin. These programs often provide diverse specializations, such as clinical or counseling psychology, and may offer accelerated formats for faster graduation.

For those in urban areas, looking into the best psychology program rankings in Albany can be helpful to compare both online and campus-based options. Graduates from these programs can pursue careers in mental health, research, education, or human resources. The right online degree not only offers flexibility but also prepares graduates for licensure or further study in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Dana H. Bovbjerg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles