World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mariska E. Kret

Mariska E. Kret

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9110 8512 396 382 171 7200

Mariska E. Kret publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mariska E. Kret between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mariska E. Kret published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 31 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 12 publications
2007 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mariska E. Kret: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 3
2011 6
2012 3
2013 5
2014 6
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 18
2019 12
2020 15
2021 19
2022 20
2023 20
2024 19
2025 12
Total 183
Download as CSV

Mariska E. Kret publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariska E. Kret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 171 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 171
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mariska E. Kret D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariska E. Kret sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mariska E. Kret is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research spans a variety of fields within psychology and neuroscience, focusing primarily on social and cognitive processes as they relate to human and non-human behavior.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these broader disciplines, Kret has contributed to several subfields, notably:

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Their work covers key topics such as:

  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

Kret has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Affective Science
  • Cognition & Emotion
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent papers demonstrate a focus on emotional expression, physiological synchrony, and mental state attribution. Notable publications include:

  • "Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes," 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Physiological synchrony is associated with cooperative success in real-life interactions," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Physiological synchrony is associated with attraction in a blind date setting," 2021, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Defining key concepts for mental state attribution," 2024, Communications Psychology

Kret has collaborated frequently with researchers such as Tom S. Roth, Milica Nikolić, Evy van Berlo, Juan Olvido Perea-García, and Iliana Samara. These repeated collaborations reflect sustained research partnerships across various studies.

Best Publications

  • A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals.

    M.E. Kret;B. de Gelder;B. de Gelder

  • Preprocessing pupil size data: Guidelines and code

    Mariska E. Kret;Elio E. Sjak-Shie

  • Connecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion.

    Eliska Prochazkova;Mariska E. Kret

  • Standing up for the body. Recent progress in uncovering the networks involved in the perception of bodies and bodily expressions

    Beatrice de Gelder;Jan Van den Stock;Jan Van den Stock;Hanneke K.M. Meeren;Charlotte B.A. Sinke;Charlotte B.A. Sinke

  • Oxytocin Conditions Intergroup Relations Through Upregulated In-Group Empathy, Cooperation, Conformity, and Defense.

    Carsten K.W. De Dreu;Mariska E. Kret

  • Oxytocin-Motivated Ally Selection is Moderated by Fetal Testosterone Exposure and Empathic Concern.

    Mariska Esther Kret;Carsten eDe Dreu

  • Gender differences in emotion perception and self-reported emotional intelligence: A test of the emotion sensitivity hypothesis.

    Agneta H. Fischer;Mariska E. Kret;Joost Broekens

  • Similarities and differences in perceiving threat from dynamic faces and bodies. An fMRI study.

    M.E. Kret;S. Pichon;S. Pichon;J. Grèzes;B. de Gelder;B. de Gelder

  • Perception of face and body expressions using electromyography, pupillometry and gaze measures

    Mariska E. Kret;Jeroen J. Stekelenburg;Karin Roelofs;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Emotional signals from faces, bodies and scenes influence observers' face expressions, fixations and pupil-size

    Mariska Esther Kret;Karin Roelofs;Jeroen Stekelenburg;Beatrice de Gelder

  • The rise of affectivism

    Daniel Dukes;Daniel Dukes;Kathryn Abrams;Ralph Adolphs;Mohammed E. Ahmed

  • Pupil Mimicry Correlates With Trust in In-Group Partners With Dilating Pupils

    M. E. Kret;A. H. Fischer;C. K. W. De Dreu

  • Emotional expressions beyond facial muscle actions. A call for studying autonomic signals and their impact on social perception

    Mariska Esther Kret

  • The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies?

    Rianne van Rooijen;Annemie Ploeger;Mariska E. Kret

  • Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes

    Mariska E. Kret;Eliska Prochazkova;Elisabeth H.M. Sterck;Zanna Clay

  • Emotion processing deficits: a liability spectrum providing insight into comorbidity of mental disorders.

    Mariska E. Kret;Annemie Ploeger

  • Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions

    Mariska Esther Kret;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • The role of negative affectivity and social inhibition in perceiving social threat: an fMRI study.

    Mariska Esther Kret;Johan Denollet;Julie Grèzes;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Chimpanzees and Humans Mimic Pupil-Size of Conspecifics

    Mariska E. Kret;Masaki Tomonaga;Tetsuro Matsuzawa

  • Islamic Headdress Influences How Emotion is Recognized from the Eyes

    Mariska Esther Kret;Beatrice de Gelder

  • Bonobos (Pan paniscus) show an attentional bias toward conspecifics’ emotions

    Mariska E. Kret;Linda Jaasma;Thomas Bionda;Jasper G. Wijnen

Frequent Co-Authors

Carsten K. W. De Dreu
Carsten K. W. De Dreu University of Groningen
Beatrice de Gelder
Beatrice de Gelder Maastricht University
Agneta H. Fischer
Agneta H. Fischer University of Amsterdam
Julie Grèzes
Julie Grèzes École Normale Supérieure
Disa Sauter
Disa Sauter University of Amsterdam
Carolien Rieffe
Carolien Rieffe University of Twente
Masaki Tomonaga
Masaki Tomonaga University of Human Environments
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University
Tetsuro Matsuzawa
Tetsuro Matsuzawa California Institute of Technology
Elisabeth H. M. Sterck
Elisabeth H. M. Sterck Biomedical Primate Research Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of online programs and career paths. One prominent and growing field is substance abuse counseling, which provides vital support for individuals battling addiction. As demand increases, so do opportunities for aspiring counselors to enter the workforce through various educational pathways, including flexible online degrees.

Requirements to become a counselor can differ by location. For example, those interested in San Francisco substance abuse counselor certification requirements will find licensure steps may be different from those in other cities. Similarly, if you’re considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in San Jose, you’ll need to fulfill specific educational and supervised experience standards.

Other regions also have unique processes. Researching how to become a substance abuse counselor in Santa Ana or understanding the substance abuse counselor requirements in Scottsdale are important steps for anyone aiming to specialize their psychology degree. Online programs make it easier to meet these requirements, balance work, and gain real-world experience, creating a strong foundation for a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Mariska E. Kret

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles