World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benjamin Becker

Benjamin Becker

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4239 3918 36 35 268 10877
Neuroscience 58 4191 3843 57 54 279 11137

Benjamin Becker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin Becker between 1954 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin Becker published across 73 years, from 1954 to 2026, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 68 publications in 2021. 56 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 68. Peak 68 publications in 2021. 1954: 1 publication 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 51 publications 2021: 68 publications 2022: 52 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 50 publications 2025: 55 publications 2026: 1 publication
1954 2026

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin Becker: publications per year, 1954 to 2026
Year Publications
1954 1
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 4
2011 2
2012 4
2013 13
2014 2
2015 9
2016 12
2017 13
2018 28
2019 34
2020 51
2021 68
2022 52
2023 43
2024 50
2025 55
2026 1
Total 444
Download as CSV

Benjamin Becker publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Becker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 278–287 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 279 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125 279
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin Becker D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Becker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334 58
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin Becker is affiliated with the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China in China. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. They also work extensively in Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Imaging.

The scientist's work has contributed to a variety of topics, including Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Mental Health Research, and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications.

Recent publications from Becker highlight diverse research interests and international collaboration. Notable papers include:

  • Prevalence and Psychosocial Correlates of Mental Health Outcomes Among Chinese College Students During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic, 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language, 2020, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz
  • Advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research: lessons learned and future directions for clinical research, 2020, Molecular Psychiatry
  • A distributed fMRI-based signature for the subjective experience of fear, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Empathic pain evoked by sensory and emotional-communicative cues share common and process-specific neural representations, 2020, eLife

Becker collaborates often with several researchers, including Keith M. Kendrick, Shuxia Yao, Xinqi Zhou, Feng Zhou, and Weihua Zhao. These collaborations reflect an extensive network within neuroscience and psychology research communities.

Their research appears frequently in prominent scientific journals and venues. The most common publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • NeuroImage
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Psychoradiology
  • Translational Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner

    Dirk Scheele;Andrea Wille;Keith M. Kendrick;Birgit Stoffel-Wagner

  • Neural, electrophysiological and anatomical basis of brain-network variability and its characteristic changes in mental disorders

    Jie Zhang;Jie Zhang;Wei Cheng;Zhaowen Liu;Zhaowen Liu;Kai Zhang

  • Oxytocin facilitates protective responses to aversive social stimuli in males.

    Nadine Striepens;Dirk Scheele;Keith M. Kendrick;Benjamin Becker

  • Measurement and Conceptualization of Gaming Disorder According to the World Health Organization Framework: the Development of the Gaming Disorder Test

    Halley M. Pontes;Bruno Schivinski;Cornelia Sindermann;Mei Li

  • Oxytocin Facilitates the Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Humans

    Monika Eckstein;Benjamin Becker;Dirk Scheele;Claudia Scholz

  • The Multipurpose Application WeChat: A Review on Recent Research.

    Christian Montag;Benjamin Becker;Chunmei Gan

  • Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language

    Cornelia Sindermann;Peng Sha;Min Zhou;Jennifer Wernicke

  • Advances in the field of intranasal oxytocin research: lessons learned and future directions for clinical research

    Daniel S. Quintana;Alexander Lischke;Sally Grace;Dirk Scheele;Dirk Scheele

  • The Role of Empathy and Life Satisfaction in Internet and Smartphone Use Disorder.

    Bernd Lachmann;Cornelia Sindermann;Rayna Y. Sariyska;Ruixue Luo

  • Fear Processing and Social Networking in the Absence of a Functional Amygdala

    Benjamin Becker;Yoan Mihov;Dirk Scheele;Keith Kendrick

  • Oxytocin, the peptide that bonds the sexes also divides them

    Shan Gao;Benjamin Becker;Lizhu Luo;Yayuan Geng

  • A distributed fMRI-based signature for the subjective experience of fear.

    Feng Zhou;Feng Zhou;Feng Zhou;Weihua Zhao;Ziyu Qi;Yayuan Geng

  • The impact of early-onset cannabis use on functional brain correlates of working memory

    Benjamin Becker;Daniel Wagner;Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank;Elmar Spuentrup

  • Oxytocin enhances attractiveness of unfamiliar female faces independent of the dopamine reward system.

    Nadine Striepens;Andreas Matusch;Keith M. Kendrick;Yoan Mihov

  • Correspondent functional topography of the human left inferior parietal lobule at rest and under task revealed using resting-state fMRI and coactivation based parcellation

    Jiaojian Wang;Sangma Xie;Xin Guo;Benjamin Becker

  • Empathic pain evoked by sensory and emotional-communicative cues share common and process-specific neural representations.

    Feng Zhou;Feng Zhou;Jialin Li;Weihua Zhao;Lei Xu

  • Overview of Human Oxytocin Research

    Keith M. Kendrick;Adam J. Guastella;Benjamin Becker

  • Internet Communication Disorder and the structure of the human brain: initial insights on WeChat addiction.

    Christian Montag;Zhiying Zhao;Cornelia Sindermann;Lei Xu

  • Oxytocin selectively facilitates learning with social feedback and increases activity and functional connectivity in emotional memory and reward processing regions.

    Jiehui Hu;Song Qi;Benjamin Becker;Lizhu Luo

  • Electroconvulsive therapy selectively enhanced feedforward connectivity from fusiform face area to amygdala in major depressive disorder.

    Jiaojian Wang;Qiang Wei;Tongjian Bai;Xiaoqin Zhou

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith M. Kendrick
Keith M. Kendrick University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
René Hurlemann
René Hurlemann Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Bharat B. Biswal
Bharat B. Biswal New Jersey Institute of Technology
Bernd Weber
Bernd Weber University of Bonn
Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank University of Cologne
Tingyong Feng
Tingyong Feng Southwest University
Richard P. Ebstein
Richard P. Ebstein Southwestern University of Finance and Economics
Wolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier University of Bonn
Thomas E. Schlaepfer
Thomas E. Schlaepfer University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to many rewarding professions, especially in healthcare, research, or technology. For those considering alternative or supporting studies, it’s worth investigating the most profitable majors. Fields like biomedical engineering, computer science, and health sciences are consistently in demand and can complement neuroscience backgrounds.

Affordability and flexibility are important factors for many students. A variety of online programs offer accessible education, so check out the best online colleges that accept fafsa to help reduce tuition costs and maximize financial aid opportunities.

Gaining practical credentials is another way to boost your career prospects. Consider building your resume with easy licenses and certifications to get online, such as medical coding, data analysis, or laboratory technology. These can be completed quickly and offer solid earning potential.

If you’re looking for straightforward pathways to a degree, there are resources highlighting the easy degrees to get online. These options allow for greater flexibility and a faster start to your career, especially if you want to combine them with neuroscience studies.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Becker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles