World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dmitri Rozgonjuk

Dmitri Rozgonjuk

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9981 9347 5 4 86 3798

Dmitri Rozgonjuk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dmitri Rozgonjuk between 2015 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dmitri Rozgonjuk published across 11 years, from 2015 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2021. 14 of the 103 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2015 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2021. 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 6 publications
2015 2025

103 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dmitri Rozgonjuk: publications per year, 2015 to 2025
Year Publications
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 7
2019 7
2020 18
2021 23
2022 17
2023 13
2024 8
2025 6
Total 103
Download as CSV

Dmitri Rozgonjuk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dmitri Rozgonjuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 86
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dmitri Rozgonjuk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dmitri Rozgonjuk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dmitri Rozgonjuk is affiliated with the University of Tartu in Estonia. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology, with notable focus areas in Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, and Applied Psychology. Their work frequently addresses the impact of technology on adolescents and related mental health topics.

The scientist's recent publications cover various aspects of technology use, mental health, and behavior. Some of these include:

  • Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and social media's impact on daily-life and productivity at work: Do WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat Use Disorders mediate that association? (2020, Addictive Behaviors)
  • Depression, anxiety and fear of missing out as correlates of social, non-social and problematic smartphone use (2020, Addictive Behaviors)
  • Individual differences in Fear of Missing Out (FoMO): Age, gender, and the Big Five personality trait domains, facets, and items (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning (2020, International Journal of STEM Education)
  • Comparing Smartphone, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat: Which Platform Elicits the Greatest Use Disorder Symptoms? (2020, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking)

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, among whom Christian Montag, Jon D. Elhai, Cornelia Sindermann, Karin Täht, and Halley M. Pontes are the most prominent based on co-authorship counts.

Key publication venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Addictive Behaviors
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • Personality and Individual Differences

Dmitri Rozgonjuk has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by Frontiers Media:

  • Problematic Internet Technology Use: Assessment, Risk Factors, Comorbidity, Adverse Consequences and Intervention (2021)

The principal research topics explored in their body of work encompass:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Best Publications

  • The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jason C. Levine;Brian J. Hall;Brian J. Hall;Jon D. Elhai

  • Depression, anxiety and fear of missing out as correlates of social, non-social and problematic smartphone use.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Elizabeth F. Gallinari;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Haibo Yang

  • Social media use in lectures mediates the relationship between procrastination and problematic smartphone use

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Mari Kattago;Karin Täht

  • Individual differences in Fear of Missing Out (FoMO): Age, gender, and the Big Five personality trait domains, facets, and items

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • Mathematics anxiety among STEM and social sciences students: the roles of mathematics self-efficacy, and deep and surface approach to learning

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Tiina Kraav;Kristel Mikkor;Kerli Orav-Puurand

  • Problematic Smartphone Use, Deep and Surface Approaches to Learning, and Social Media Use in Lectures.

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Kristiina Saal;Karin Täht

  • Fear of missing out is associated with disrupted activities from receiving smartphone notifications and surface learning in college students

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jon D. Elhai;Tracii Ryan;Graham G. Scott

  • Worry and anger are associated with latent classes of problematic smartphone use severity among college students.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Caglar Yildirim;Ahmad M. Alghraibeh

  • Non-social smartphone use mediates the relationship between intolerance of uncertainty and problematic smartphone use: Evidence from a repeated-measures study

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Karin Täht;Kristjan Vassil

  • Emotion regulation in relation to smartphone use: Process smartphone use mediates the association between expressive suppression and problematic smartphone use

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai

  • Using machine learning to model problematic smartphone use severity: The significant role of fear of missing out.

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Haibo Yang;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Christian Montag

  • The propensity to trust in (automated) technology mediates the links between technology self-efficacy and fear and acceptance of artificial intelligence

    Unknown

  • Development is in the details: Age differences in the Big Five domains, facets, and nuances.

    René Mõttus;Dmitri Rozgonjuk

  • Associations between symptoms of problematic smartphone, Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram use: An item-level exploratory graph analysis perspective

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D Elhai;Alexander P Christensen

  • Comparing Smartphone, WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat: Which Platform Elicits the Greatest Use Disorder Symptoms?

    Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Cornelia Sindermann;Jon D. Elhai;Christian Montag

  • Do pop-up notifications regarding smartphone use decrease screen time, phone checking behavior, and self-reported problematic smartphone use? Evidence from a two-month experimental study

    Karina Loid;Karin Täht;Dmitri Rozgonjuk

  • Fear of missing out predicts repeated measurements of greater negative affect using experience sampling methodology

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Tour Liu;Haibo Yang

  • Substance and behavioral addictions may share a similar underlying process of dysregulation.

    Steve Sussman;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden

  • Disrupted Daily Activities From Interruptive Smartphone Notifications: Relations With Depression and Anxiety Severity and the Mediating Role of Boredom Proneness:

    Jon D. Elhai;Jon D. Elhai;Dmitri Rozgonjuk;Ahmad M. Alghraibeh;Haibo Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Cornelia Sindermann
Cornelia Sindermann University of Ulm
René Mõttus
René Mõttus University of Edinburgh
Brian J. Hall
Brian J. Hall New York University Shanghai
Anu Realo
Anu Realo University of Warwick
Jüri Allik
Jüri Allik University of Tartu
Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman University of Southern California
Julia Brailovskaia
Julia Brailovskaia Ruhr University Bochum
Halley M. Pontes
Halley M. Pontes Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing an online psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse career pathways, but affordability is a key consideration for many students. Numerous accredited institutions now offer flexible programs catering to both undergraduate and graduate learners, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

Cost-conscious students can consider options such as the cheapest online psychology master's programs in Texas or explore broader choices among the most affordable online psychology degree programs in Texas. These programs can be excellent for those concerned with tuition fees but still aiming for high-quality education.

Similar affordable options are available in other states as well. For example, Pennsylvania offers affordable online psychology programs in Pennsylvania, appealing to budget-minded students looking for flexible study opportunities. Students in specific regions may be interested in targeted programs like affordable psychology degrees in Bethlehem.

These accessible pathways give graduates the credentials needed for roles in counseling, mental health services, education, and business. As you explore your options, consider factors such as accreditation, program specializations, and future career goals to make an informed decision.

Best Scientists Citing Dmitri Rozgonjuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles