World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4177 3856 2332 2104 220 13686

Ofir Turel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ofir Turel between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ofir Turel published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 15 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2020. 43 of the 329 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2020. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 17 publications
2004 2025

329 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ofir Turel: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 10
2007 12
2008 8
2009 7
2010 13
2011 9
2012 10
2013 6
2014 5
2015 17
2016 17
2017 18
2018 21
2019 29
2020 31
2021 29
2022 23
2023 18
2024 26
2025 17
Total 329
Download as CSV

Ofir Turel publications per year - data summary

  • Ofir Turel, a Psychology scholar from California State University, Fullerton, has 329 publications recorded across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2004 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 31 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2004, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 15.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 15.0 per year counting only the 22 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 113 publications, 34% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2004-2011: 62 publications (7.8 per year); 2012-2019: 123 publications (15.4 per year); 2020-2025: 144 publications (24.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ofir Turel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofir Turel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 220 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 220
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ofir Turel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Ofir Turel, a Psychology scholar from California State University, Fullerton, records 220 publications - the 74th percentile of the discipline.
  • 74% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ofir Turel, and about 26% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Ofir Turel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ofir Turel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ofir Turel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Ofir Turel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Ofir Turel, a Psychology scholar from California State University, Fullerton, records 56 D-Index - the 64th percentile of the discipline.
  • 64% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Ofir Turel, and about 36% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Ofir Turel ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ofir Turel is affiliated with California State University, Fullerton in the United States. Their research spans several areas within social sciences and psychology, focusing primarily on the intersection of technology, human behavior, and organizational dynamics.

Their work has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals and conferences, including:

  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Internet Research
  • Journal of Management Information Systems
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Key recent papers authored or coauthored by Ofir Turel include:

  • The buffering effect of flow experience on the relationship between overload and social media users' discontinuance intentions (2020, Telematics and Informatics)
  • Interactions of impulsivity, general executive functions, and specific inhibitory control explain symptoms of social-networks-use disorder: An experimental study (2020, Scientific Reports)
  • The impact of e-commerce capabilities on agricultural firms' performance gains: the mediating role of organizational agility (2020, Industrial Management & Data Systems)
  • Adverse consequences of emotional support seeking through social network sites in coping with stress from a global pandemic (2021, International Journal of Information Management)
  • Followers' problematic engagement with influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective (2022, Computers in Human Behavior)

Their research covers a range of topics, with significant emphasis on:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Ofir Turel contributes extensively to the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Within these broad fields, they have worked on subfields including:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Information Systems and Management

Collaboration is a notable aspect of their academic output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Qinghua He
  • Hamed Qahri-Saremi
  • Isaac Vaghefi
  • Shuyue Zhang
  • Antoine Bechara

Best Publications

  • The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko

  • Integrating technology addiction and use: an empirical investigation of online auction users

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko;Paul Giles

  • User acceptance of hedonic digital artifacts: A theory of consumption values perspective

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko;Nick Bontis

  • User acceptance of wireless short messaging services: Deconstructing perceived value

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko;Nick Bontis

  • Satisfaction with mobile services in Canada: An empirical investigation

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko

  • Online game addiction among adolescents: motivation and prevention factors

    Zhengchuan Xu;Ofir Turel;Yufei Yuan

  • Quitting the use of a habituated hedonic information system: a theoretical model and empirical examination of Facebook users

    Ofir Turel;Ofir Turel

  • Problematic Use of Social Networking Sites: Antecedents and Consequence from a Dual-System Theory Perspective

    Ofir Turel;Hamed Qahri-Saremi

  • Family and work-related consequences of addiction to organizational pervasive technologies

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko;Nick Bontis

  • The dark side of information technology use

    Monideepa Tarafdar;Ashish Gupta;Ofir Turel

  • Examination of Neural Systems Sub-Serving Facebook “Addiction”:

    Ofir Turel;Ofir Turel;Qinghua He;Qinghua He;Gui Xue;Gui Xue;Lin Xiao

  • The mediating roles of strain facets and coping strategies in translating techno-stressors into adverse job outcomes

    Fulvio Gaudioso;Ofir Turel;Carlo Galimberti

  • In Justice We Trust: Predicting User Acceptance of E-Customer Services

    Ofir Turel;Yufei Yuan;Catherine Connelly

  • Brain anatomy alterations associated with Social Networking Site (SNS) addiction

    Qinghua He;Ofir Turel;Antoine Bechara

  • The dark side of information technology

    Monideepa Tarafdar;John DArcy;Ofir Turel;Ashish Gupta

  • Reflecting on the "dark side" of information technology use

    John D'Arcy;Ashish Gupta;Monideepa Tarafdar;Ofir Turel

  • A Modified Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for Normality

    Zvi Drezner;Ofir Turel;Dawit Zerom

  • A trust-risk perspective on social commerce use: an examination of the biasing role of habit

    Samira Farivar;Ofir Turel;Yufei Yuan

  • ‘I’m busy (and competitive)!’ Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure

    Catherine E Connelly;Dianne P Ford;Ofir Turel;Brent Gallupe

  • The buffering effect of flow experience on the relationship between overload and social media users’ discontinuance intentions

    Jiabao Lin;Shunzhi Lin;Ofir Turel;Feng Xu

  • The "Facebook-self": characteristics and psychological predictors of false self-presentation on Facebook.

    Oren Gil-Or;Yossi Levi-Belz;Ofir Turel;Ofir Turel

  • INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGY ADDICTION AND USE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF ONLINE AUCTION USERS 1

    Ofir Turel;Alexander Serenko;Paul Giles

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Serenko
Alexander Serenko University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Qinghua He
Qinghua He Southwest University
Antoine Bechara
Antoine Bechara University of Southern California
Yufei Yuan
Yufei Yuan McMaster University
Damien Brevers
Damien Brevers Université Catholique de Louvain
Monideepa Tarafdar
Monideepa Tarafdar University of Massachusetts Amherst
Nick Bontis
Nick Bontis McMaster University
Christy M. K. Cheung
Christy M. K. Cheung Hong Kong Baptist University
Zvi Drezner
Zvi Drezner California State University, Fullerton
Gui Xue
Gui Xue Beijing Normal University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology can open diverse career pathways, especially in fields like behavioral analysis, counseling, and mental health services. Online psychology degrees are increasingly popular for those seeking flexibility while advancing their education. Many students pursue specialized roles, such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which require additional credentials beyond a basic degree.

Each state may have unique requirements for licensure and certification. For example, those interested in pursuing bcba certification requirements in Anaheim should review local graduate coursework and supervised work experience criteria. Aspiring professionals considering becoming a bcba in Anchorage will also need to fulfill specific Alaska state guidelines.

Areas like Arlington have particular standards for BCBA roles, so understanding Arlington bcba education requirements is essential for local candidates. Similarly, those looking into how to become a bcba in Atlanta should stay updated on Georgia’s unique credentialing processes. Carefully researching region-specific pathways helps ensure a smooth transition from study to a rewarding psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Ofir Turel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles