World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2235 2036 247 231 212 27109

Daria J. Kuss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daria J. Kuss between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daria J. Kuss published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 16 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2020. 16 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2020. 2011: 6 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 11 publications
2011 2025

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daria J. Kuss: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 6
2012 17
2013 14
2014 13
2015 18
2016 14
2017 20
2018 20
2019 20
2020 23
2021 23
2022 14
2023 22
2024 5
2025 11
Total 240
Download as CSV

Daria J. Kuss publications per year - data summary

  • Daria J. Kuss, a Psychology scholar from Nottingham Trent University, has 240 publications recorded across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2011 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive years are 2020 and 2021, with 23 publications each.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2024, with 5 publications.
  • The rate of publication averages 16.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.0 per year counting only the 15 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 75 publications, 31% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2011-2015: 68 publications (13.6 per year); 2016-2020: 97 publications (19.4 per year); 2021-2025: 75 publications (15.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Daria J. Kuss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria J. Kuss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Daria J. Kuss publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Daria J. Kuss, a Psychology scholar from Nottingham Trent University, records 212 publications - the 72nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 72% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Daria J. Kuss, and about 28% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Daria J. Kuss ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Daria J. Kuss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daria J. Kuss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Daria J. Kuss D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Daria J. Kuss, a Psychology scholar from Nottingham Trent University, records 70 D-Index - the 81st percentile of the discipline.
  • 81% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Daria J. Kuss, and about 19% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Daria J. Kuss ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Daria J. Kuss is affiliated with Nottingham Trent University in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses on the intersection of social sciences and psychology, with extensive work in subfields including sociology and political science, clinical psychology, education, applied psychology, and social psychology.

The main topics of Kuss's work cover a range of issues related to technology and mental health, particularly emphasizing the impact of technology on adolescents and child development in relation to digital technology. Other significant research themes include sexuality, behavior, and technology, digital mental health interventions, digital games and media, social media and politics, as well as gambling behavior and treatments.

Their recent research publications include:

  • "Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study," 2021, Addiction
  • "Fear of Missing Out, Mental Wellbeing, and Social Connectedness: A Seven-Day Social Media Abstinence Trial," 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "Internet addictions outside of Europe: A systematic literature review," 2020, Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Passive objective measures in the assessment of problematic smartphone use: A systematic review," 2020, Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • "Online Dating and Problematic Use: A Systematic Review," 2020, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Frequent co-authors who collaborated with Kuss include:

  • Mark D. Griffiths
  • Melina A. Throuvala
  • Alexander Sumich
  • Olatz López-Fernández
  • Mike Rennoldson

Kuss has published extensively in several scholarly venues, particularly in:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (8 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (8 publications)
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (5 publications)
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (5 publications)
  • Computers in Human Behavior (4 publications)

Regarding book publications, Kuss contributed to works published by Frontiers Media and Dykinson eBooks. Notable books include:

  • "Online Psychology Beyond Addiction and Gaming: A Global Look at Mental Health and Internet-Related Technologies," 2022
  • "Imagen corporal, salud y educación," 2023

Best Publications

  • Online Social Networking and Addiction—A Review of the Psychological Literature

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths

  • The relationship between addictive use of social media and video games and symptoms of psychiatric disorders: a large-scale cross-sectional study

    Cecilie Schou Andreassen;Joël Billieux;Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss

  • Internet addiction: a systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade.

    Daria Kuss;Mark Griffiths;Laurent Karila;Joël Billieux

  • Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned.

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Internet Gaming Addiction: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research

    Daria Joanna Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Can Disordered Mobile Phone Use Be Considered a Behavioral Addiction? An Update on Current Evidence and a Comprehensive Model for Future Research

    Joël Billieux;Joël Billieux;Pierre Maurage;Pierre Maurage;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Daria J. Kuss

  • Internet addiction and problematic Internet use: A systematic review of clinical research.

    Daria J Kuss;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez

  • Internet addiction in students: Prevalence and risk factors

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths;Jens F. Binder

  • Internet addiction in adolescents: prevalence and risk factors

    Daria J Kuss;Antonius J van Rooij;Gillian W Shorter;Mark D Griffiths

  • Social networking addiction: an overview of preliminary findings

    Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss;Zsolt Demetrovics

  • Internet gaming addiction: current perspectives.

    Daria J Kuss

  • Internet and Gaming Addiction: A Systematic Literature Review of Neuroimaging Studies

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Online gaming addiction in children and adolescents: A review of empirical research.

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Online gaming addiction? Motives predict addictive play behavior in massively multiplayer online role-playing games.

    Daria J. Kuss;Jorik Louws;Reinout W. Wiers

  • Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al (2014)

    Mark D. Griffiths;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Vladan Starcevic

  • Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

    John B. Saunders;Wei Hao;Jiang Long;Daniel L. King

  • Video Game Addiction: Past, Present and Future

    Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss;Daniel L. King

  • Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths;Halley M. Pontes

  • The (co-)occurrence of problematic video gaming, substance use, and psychosocial problems in adolescents

    Antonius J. van Rooij;Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths;Gillian W. Shorter

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Halley M. Pontes
Halley M. Pontes Birkbeck, University of London
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Daniel King
Daniel King Flinders University
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Paul Delfabbro
Paul Delfabbro University of Adelaide
Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Jeffrey L. Derevensky McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in psychology opens the door to many rewarding careers, especially in the field of mental health and counseling. One of the most in-demand roles is that of a substance abuse counselor, where professionals help individuals overcome addiction and reclaim their lives.

If you are considering this path, it’s important to understand state-specific education and certification requirements. For example, you can review Huntsville substance abuse counselor certification requirements or learn about Indianapolis substance abuse counselors education requirements. These guides explain necessary degrees, supervised experience hours, and licensure steps for each area.

Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and can help meet these requirements. For those seeking opportunities in California, the Irvine substance abuse counselor certification requirements are particularly useful. Additionally, you can find comprehensive steps on how to become a substance abuse counselor in Irving.

Exploring these pathways can set you on the right track towards a fulfilling and impactful career, whether you study on campus or online.

Best Scientists Citing Daria J. Kuss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles