World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Rising Stars 51 291 291 13 13 183 10922
Psychology 56 4203 3882 449 425 175 12588

Halley M. Pontes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Halley M. Pontes between 2013 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Halley M. Pontes published across 13 years, from 2013 to 2025, averaging 15.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2020. 22 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2013 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2020. 2013: 1 publication 2014: 7 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 9 publications
2013 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Halley M. Pontes: publications per year, 2013 to 2025
Year Publications
2013 1
2014 7
2015 19
2016 18
2017 21
2018 16
2019 24
2020 29
2021 18
2022 19
2023 11
2024 13
2025 9
Total 205
Download as CSV

Halley M. Pontes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Halley M. Pontes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Halley M. Pontes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Halley M. Pontes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Halley M. Pontes is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research centers on the intersection of technology and mental health, with particular attention to behavioral addictions and the impact of digital environments on psychological well-being.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • Depression and anxiety symptoms associated with internet gaming disorder before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study, 2021, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Internet gaming disorder and psychosocial well-being: A longitudinal study of older-aged adolescents and emerging adults, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • Psychometric Properties of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF): Systematic Review, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Problematic Smartphone and Social Media Use Among Bangladeshi College and University Students Amid COVID-19: The Role of Psychological Well-Being and Pandemic Related Factors, 2021, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Spanish Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short Form (IGDS9-SF): Prevalence and Relationship with Online Gambling and Quality of Life, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Halley Pontes frequently collaborates with several other researchers in the field. These coauthors include:

  • Christian Montag
  • Mark D. Griffiths
  • Bruno Schivinski
  • Chung-Ying Lin
  • Amir H. Pakpour

The scientist publishes often in key venues related to mental health, behavioral addictions, and digital psychology. Frequent publication venues are:

  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Addictive Behaviors Reports
  • PLoS ONE

Halley Pontes' research contributions extend to book publications as well, including "Behavioral Addictions," published by Springer International Publishing in 2022.

Their main fields of study lie within Social Sciences, with a substantive focus on Psychology. Within these, several subfields are addressed in their work, such as Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, Applied Psychology, and Communication.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, prominently:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Digital Games and Media

Best Publications

  • Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder

    Halley M. Pontes;Mark D. Griffiths

  • The conceptualisation and measurement of DSM-5 Internet Gaming Disorder: the development of the IGD-20 Test.

    Halley M. Pontes;Orsolya Király;Zsolt Demetrovics;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Working towards an international consensus on criteria for assessing Internet Gaming Disorder: a critical commentary on Petry et al (2014)

    Mark D. Griffiths;Antonius J. Van Rooij;Daniel Kardefelt-Winther;Vladan Starcevic

  • Organizational identification, work engagement, and job satisfaction

    M. Karanika-Murray;N. Duncan;Halley Pontes;Griffiths

  • Gaming disorder: Its delineation as an important condition for diagnosis, management, and prevention

    John B. Saunders;Wei Hao;Jiang Long;Daniel L. King

  • Chaos and confusion in DSM-5 diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder: issues, concerns, and recommendations for clarity in the field

    Daria J. Kuss;Mark D. Griffiths;Halley M. Pontes

  • Validation of the ten-Item Internet Gaming Disorder Test (IGDT-10) and evaluation of the nine DSM-5 internet gaming disorder criteria

    Orsolya Király;Pawel Sleczka;Halley M. Pontes;Róbert Urbán

  • Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective.

    Hans Jürgen Rumpf;Sophia Achab;Sophia Achab;Joël Billieux;Henrietta Bowden-Jones

  • The evolution of Internet addiction: A global perspective

    Mark D. Griffiths;Daria J. Kuss;Joël Billieux;Halley M. Pontes

  • Measurement and Conceptualization of Gaming Disorder According to the World Health Organization Framework: the Development of the Gaming Disorder Test

    Halley M. Pontes;Bruno Schivinski;Cornelia Sindermann;Mei Li

  • Clinical psychology of Internet addiction: a review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment

    Halley M Pontes;Daria J Kuss;Mark D Griffiths

  • Self-reported dependence on mobile phones in young adults: a European cross-cultural empirical survey

    Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Olatz Lopez-Fernandez;Daria J. Kuss;Lucia Romo;Yannick Morvan

  • Investigating the differential effects of social networking site addiction and Internet gaming disorder on psychological health

    Halley M. Pontes

  • Neurobiological Correlates in Internet Gaming Disorder: A Systematic Literature Review.

    Daria J. Kuss;Halley M. Pontes;Mark D. Griffiths

  • The impact of Internet-based specific activities on the perceptions of Internet addiction, quality of life, and excessive usage: A cross-sectional study.

    Halley M. Pontes;Attila Szabo;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Problematic gaming behaviour and health-related outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis:

    Niko Männikkö;Heidi Ruotsalainen;Jouko Miettunen;Halley M Pontes

  • Portuguese validation of the Internet Addiction Test: An empirical study.

    Halley de Oliveira Miguel Pontes;Ivone Alexandra Martins Patrão;Mark D. Griffiths

  • Beyond "Facebook Addiction": The Role of Cognitive-Related Factors and Psychiatric Distress in Social Networking Site Addiction.

    Halley M. Pontes;Megan Taylor;Vasileios Stavropoulos

  • Internet Gaming Disorder Among Slovenian Primary Schoolchildren: Findings From a Nationally Representative Sample of Adolescents.

    Halley M. Pontes;Mirna Macur;Mark D. Griffiths

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D. Griffiths
Mark D. Griffiths Nottingham Trent University
Daria J. Kuss
Daria J. Kuss Nottingham Trent University
Zsolt Demetrovics
Zsolt Demetrovics Flinders University
Christian Montag
Christian Montag University of Macau
Joël Billieux
Joël Billieux University of Lausanne
Jeffrey L. Derevensky
Jeffrey L. Derevensky McGill University
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf University of Lübeck
Daniel King
Daniel King Flinders University
Christopher J. Ferguson
Christopher J. Ferguson Stetson University
Ståle Pallesen
Ståle Pallesen University of Bergen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens a wide range of online career pathways suited for diverse interests. Many students pursue advanced psychology degrees that lead to specialized roles. For those intrigued by workplace behavior, understanding the steps to becoming a business psychologist can help you blend organizational knowledge with psychological expertise.

If you enjoy helping children cope with stressful situations, you might want to explore the skills needed to be a child life specialist. This career focuses on supporting children and families in hospitals or clinical settings.

Those passionate about child development may follow the education requirements for child psychologist, which usually involves a relevant graduate degree and appropriate licensure.

For students targeting mental health roles, understanding the steps to become clinical psychologist will be especially helpful. Online programs often offer flexible options, allowing you to balance study with hands-on clinical training.

Best Scientists Citing Halley M. Pontes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles