World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 86 1127 988 133 122 403 30670

Samuel R. Chamberlain publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Samuel R. Chamberlain between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Samuel R. Chamberlain published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 21.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 62 publications in 2021. 56 of the 464 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 62. Peak 62 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 62 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 40 publications 2025: 16 publications
2004 2025

464 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Samuel R. Chamberlain: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 3
2006 7
2007 14
2008 7
2009 8
2010 16
2011 11
2012 13
2013 14
2014 21
2015 14
2016 26
2017 23
2018 25
2019 27
2020 41
2021 62
2022 39
2023 36
2024 40
2025 16
Total 464
Download as CSV

Samuel R. Chamberlain publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel R. Chamberlain sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 403 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 403
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Samuel R. Chamberlain D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Samuel R. Chamberlain sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 86
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Samuel R. Chamberlain is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and has a substantial body of work in Psychology, with a particular emphasis on Clinical Psychology. Their research spans 321 publications, covering various subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Sociology and Political Science, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's research topics include several specific areas: obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, gambling behavior and treatments, the impact of technology on adolescents, sexuality, behavior and technology, eating disorders and behaviors, COVID-19 and mental health, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Chamberlain include Jon E. Grant, Konstantinos Ioannidis, Naomi Fineberg, Murat Yücel, and Christine Löchner. These collaborations highlight involvement in a diverse network of scholars focused on mental health and behavioral research.

Chamberlain has contributed numerous articles to various journals. Major publication venues where their work frequently appears are Comprehensive Psychiatry, CNS Spectrums, Journal of Psychiatric Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Chamberlain include:

  • "Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance" (2020) in Comprehensive Psychiatry
  • "Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19" (2021) in EClinicalMedicine
  • "Which conditions should be considered as disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) designation of 'other specified disorders due to addictive behaviors'?" (2020) in Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • "Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review" (2020) in Clinical Psychology Review
  • "Expert appraisal of criteria for assessing gaming disorder: an international Delphi study" (2021) in Addiction

Chamberlain has also authored at least one book published by Cambridge University Press titled Impulse, released in 2023.

Best Publications

  • The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control

    Adam Hampshire;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Martin M. Monti;John S. Duncan

  • Integrating evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychological studies of obsessive-compulsive disorder: The orbitofronto-striatal model revisited

    Lara Menzies;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Angela R. Laird;Sarah M. Thelen

  • The neuropsychology of obsessive compulsive disorder: the importance of failures in cognitive and behavioural inhibition as candidate endophenotypic markers

    S.R. Chamberlain;A.D. Blackwell;N.A. Fineberg;T.W. Robbins

  • A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task

    Frederick Verbruggen;Adam R. Aron;Guido Ph Band;Christian Beste

  • Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance.

    Orsolya Király;Marc N. Potenza;Dan J. Stein;Daniel L. King

  • The Roles of Dopamine and Noradrenaline in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Attention-Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder

    Natalia del Campo;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Barbara J. Sahakian;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Motor inhibition and cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania.

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Naomi A. Fineberg;Andrew D. Blackwell;Trevor W. Robbins

  • Probing compulsive and impulsive behaviors, from animal models to endophenotypes: a narrative review.

    Naomi A Fineberg;Naomi A Fineberg;Naomi A Fineberg;Marc N Potenza;Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Heather A Berlin

  • Orbitofrontal dysfunction in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and their unaffected relatives

    Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Lara Menzies;Lara Menzies;Adam Hampshire;John Suckling

  • Neurochemical modulation of response inhibition and probabilistic learning in humans.

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Ulrich Müller;Andrew D. Blackwell;Luke Clark

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Amy E. Jolly

  • The neuropsychiatry of impulsivity

    Samuel R Chamberlain;Barbara J Sahakian

  • Neurocognitive endophenotypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Lara Menzies;Sophie Achard;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Naomi Fineberg

  • Impaired cognitive flexibility and motor inhibition in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Naomi A. Fineberg;Lara A. Menzies;Andrew D. Blackwell

  • Neurocognitive mechanisms in depression: implications for treatment.

    Luke Clark;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Barbara J. Sahakian

  • New Developments in Human Neurocognition: Clinical, Genetic, and Brain Imaging Correlates of Impulsivity and Compulsivity

    Naomi A Fineberg;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Anna E. Goudriaan;Dan J. Stein

  • Treatment-resistant depression and peripheral C-reactive protein.

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Jonathan Cavanagh;Peter de Boer;Valeria Mondelli

  • Biological markers for anxiety disorders, OCD and PTSD: A consensus statement. Part II: Neurochemistry, neurophysiology and neurocognition

    Borwin Bandelow;David Baldwin;Marianna Abelli;Blanca Bolea-Alamanac

  • Atomoxetine Modulates Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Inhibitory Control: A Pharmacological Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Adam Hampshire;Ulrich Müller;Katya Rubia

  • Atomoxetine Improved Response Inhibition in Adults with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Natalia del Campo;Natalia del Campo;Jonathan Dowson;Ulrich Müller

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: An N=84,285 online study

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel Chamberlain;Samuel Chamberlain;Amy Jolly

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon E. Grant
Jon E. Grant University of Chicago
Naomi A. Fineberg
Naomi A. Fineberg University of Hertfordshire
Trevor W. Robbins
Trevor W. Robbins University of Cambridge
Brian L. Odlaug
Brian L. Odlaug University of Minnesota
Barbara J. Sahakian
Barbara J. Sahakian University of Cambridge
Edward T. Bullmore
Edward T. Bullmore King's College London
Murat Yücel
Murat Yücel QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Leonardo F. Fontenelle
Leonardo F. Fontenelle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Adam Hampshire
Adam Hampshire Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open diverse career pathways, especially if you choose to pursue specialized online degrees such as counseling or clinical psychology. Many universities offer online programs tailored for working professionals and learners seeking flexibility without sacrificing quality.

When exploring your options, it’s important to consider program quality, accreditation, and alignment with state licensure requirements. For example, the top counseling degree programs in Georgia emphasize practical skills and ethical practice for aspiring counselors. Similarly, students interested in the Midwest can look into the top counseling degree programs in Iowa, which provide comprehensive training in various counseling fields.

In urban areas, opportunities expand further. The best college counseling programs in Illinois offer robust online and hybrid options for graduate students. For those located on the West Coast, particularly Southern California, the best counseling degree programs in Los Angeles deliver cutting-edge coursework and connections to a vibrant professional community.

Choosing the right online degree is a crucial step toward a rewarding psychology career in the USA, allowing you to specialize and meet state credentialing standards.

Best Scientists Citing Samuel R. Chamberlain

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles