World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
14223
World Ranking
4356
National Ranking
471

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
14577
World Ranking
4298
National Ranking
376

Adam Hampshire publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Hampshire sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 188 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Adam Hampshire D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Hampshire sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adam Hampshire is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with significant contributions in Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these areas, Hampshire's work focuses on subfields including Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Hampshire's research addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

The scientist's frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • EClinicalMedicine
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Nature Communications
  • Brain

Among their recent papers are:

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 (2021, EClinicalMedicine)
  • Cognition and Memory after Covid-19 in a Large Community Sample (2024, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • Multivariate profile and acute-phase correlates of cognitive deficits in a COVID-19 hospitalised cohort (2022, EClinicalMedicine)

Hampshire's frequent co-authors are:

  • Peter J. Hellyer
  • William Trender
  • Anne Corbett
  • Clive Ballard
  • Byron Creese

Best Publications

  • Putting brain training to the test

    Adrian M. Owen;Adam Hampshire;Jessica A. Grahn;Robert Stenton

  • The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control

    Adam Hampshire;Samuel R. Chamberlain;Martin M. Monti;John S. Duncan

  • Orbitofrontal dysfunction in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and their unaffected relatives

    Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Lara Menzies;Lara Menzies;Adam Hampshire;John Suckling

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19.

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel R Chamberlain;Samuel R Chamberlain;Amy E. Jolly

  • Fractionating Human Intelligence

    Adam Hampshire;Roger R. Highfield;Beth L. Parkin;Adrian M. Owen

  • Training the Emotional Brain: Improving Affective Control through Emotional Working Memory Training

    Susanne Schweizer;Jessica Grahn;Adam Hampshire;Dean Mobbs

  • Fractionating Attentional Control Using Event-Related fMRI

    Adam Hampshire;Adrian M. Owen

  • When thoughts become action: An fMRI paradigm to study volitional brain activity in non-communicative brain injured patients

    Mélanie Boly;Martin R. Coleman;M. H. Davis;Adam Hampshire

  • Predicting Responses to Psychedelics: A Prospective Study.

    Eline C. H. M. Haijen;Mendel Kaelen;Leor Roseman;Christopher Timmermann

  • Atomoxetine Modulates Right Inferior Frontal Activation During Inhibitory Control: A Pharmacological Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Samuel R. Chamberlain;Adam Hampshire;Ulrich Müller;Katya Rubia

  • A functional network perspective on response inhibition and attentional control

    Michelle Erika-Florence;Robert Leech;Adam Hampshire

  • Extending brain-training to the affective domain: increasing cognitive and affective executive control through emotional working memory training.

    Susanne Schweizer;Adam Hampshire;Tim Dalgleish

  • Dehydration affects brain structure and function in healthy adolescents

    Matthew J. Kempton;Ulrich Ettinger;Ulrich Ettinger;Russell Foster;Steven C.R. Williams

  • Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex

    Alexandra Woolgar;Adam Hampshire;Russell Thompson;John Duncan

  • Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control

    Adam Hampshire;David J. Sharp

  • The Effect of an Online Cognitive Training Package in Healthy Older Adults: An Online Randomized Controlled Trial

    Anne Corbett;Adrian Owen;Adam Hampshire;Jessica Grahn

  • Externally induced frontoparietal synchronization modulates network dynamics and enhances working memory performance.

    Ines R Violante;Ines R Violante;Lucia M Li;David W Carmichael;Romy Lorenz

  • Catechol O-Methyltransferase val158met Genotype Influences Frontoparietal Activity during Planning in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

    Caroline H. Williams-Gray;Adam Hampshire;Trevor W. Robbins;Adrian M. Owen

  • Attentional control in Parkinson's disease is dependent on COMT val158met genotype

    Caroline H. Williams-Gray;Adam Hampshire;Roger A. Barker;Adrian M. Owen

  • Mild Behavioral Impairment as a Marker of Cognitive Decline in Cognitively Normal Older Adults.

    Byron Creese;Helen Brooker;Zahinoor Ismail;Keith A. Wesnes

  • Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19 relative to controls: An N=84,285 online study

    Adam Hampshire;William Trender;Samuel Chamberlain;Samuel Chamberlain;Amy Jolly

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian M. Owen
Adrian M. Owen University of Western Ontario
Robert Leech
Robert Leech King's College London
David J. Sharp
David J. Sharp Imperial College London
Clive Ballard
Clive Ballard University of Exeter
Samuel R. Chamberlain
Samuel R. Chamberlain University of Southampton
Anne Corbett
Anne Corbett University of Exeter
James B. Rowe
James B. Rowe University of Cambridge
Roger A. Barker
Roger A. Barker University of Cambridge
Dag Aarsland
Dag Aarsland King's College London
David W. Carmichael
David W. Carmichael King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Neuroscience opens doors to a variety of academic and professional routes. While a traditional Neuroscience degree is valued in research and healthcare, many students consider programs that offer flexibility and strong earning potential. Choosing degrees that make the most money can help graduates thrive financially, with biomedical and health sciences leading the way.

Online education also provides convenience and accessibility. If affordability is important, you might consider online colleges that are budget-friendly and eligible for federal aid. For those interested in quick skill-building, there are best online certificate programs that can boost your qualifications and lead to lucrative roles in healthcare, data science, or psychology-related fields.

Not everyone needs to follow a difficult academic path. Some students prefer efficient routes to a degree; explore easy bachelor degrees online which provide foundational knowledge and career opportunities for those seeking a quicker journey into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Adam Hampshire

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles