World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Maximilian J. Werner

Maximilian J. Werner

Maximilian J. Werner publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian J. Werner sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Maximilian J. Werner D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian J. Werner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maximilian J. Werner is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across multiple disciplines, primarily focused on Earth and Planetary Sciences and Computer Science, with significant contributions in the domains of geophysics and artificial intelligence. Their work intersects with civil and structural engineering, geology, and mechanical engineering.

Their research topics highlight a strong emphasis on understanding earthquake dynamics and seismic phenomena. The main topics of their work include:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Seismology and earthquake studies
  • Earthquake detection and analysis
  • Seismic waves and analysis
  • Geochemistry and geologic mapping
  • Seismic imaging and inversion techniques
  • Seismic performance and analysis

Maximilian J. Werner has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Seismological Research Letters

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Werner are:

  • "Pseudoprospective Evaluation of UCERF3-ETAS Forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence," 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • "A Little Data Goes a Long Way: Automating Seismic Phase Arrival Picking at Nabro Volcano With Transfer Learning," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "Prospective evaluation of multiplicative hybrid earthquake forecasting models in California," 2022, Geophysical Journal International
  • "The Malawi Active Fault Database: An Onshore-Offshore Database for Regional Assessment of Seismic Hazard and Tectonic Evolution," 2022, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • "The Predictive Skills of Elastic Coulomb Rate-and-State Aftershock Forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Sequence," 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Werner collaborates frequently with several researchers in the field. The most common coauthors are:

  • William H. Savran
  • José A. Bayona
  • Åke Fagereng
  • Juliet Biggs
  • Pablo Iturrieta

Best Publications

  • Bayesian Estimation of the Spatially Varying Completeness Magnitude of Earthquake Catalogs

    A. Mignan;M. J. Werner;S. Wiemer;C.-C. Chen

  • First Results of the Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models Experiment

    Danijel Schorlemmer;J. Douglas Zechar;J. Douglas Zechar;Maximilian J. Werner;Edward H. Field

  • High-Resolution Long-Term and Short-Term Earthquake Forecasts for California

    Maximilian J. Werner;Agnès Helmstetter;Agnès Helmstetter;David D. Jackson;Yan Y. Kagan

  • Apparent clustering and apparent background earthquakes biased by undetected seismicity

    Didier Sornette;Didier Sornette;Maximillian J. Werner

  • The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability: Achievements and Priorities

    Danijel Schorlemmer;Maximilian J. Werner;Warner Marzocchi;Thomas H. Jordan

  • A Spatiotemporal Clustering Model for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3-ETAS): Toward an Operational Earthquake Forecast

    Edward H. Field;Kevin R. Milner;Jeanne L. Hardebeck;Morgan T. Page

  • Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models I: First-Order Results

    J. Douglas Zechar;Danijel Schorlemmer;Maximilian J. Werner;Maximilian J. Werner;Matthew C. Gerstenberger

  • Basic Models of Seismicity: Temporal Models

    Jiancang Zhuang;David S Harte;Maximilian J Werner;Sebastian Hainzl

  • A retrospective comparative forecast test on the 1992 Landers sequence

    J. Woessner;S. Hainzl;W. Marzocchi;Maximilian J Werner;Maximilian J Werner

  • Estimating ETAS: the effects of truncation, missing data, and model assumptions

    Stefanie Seif;Arnaud Mignan;Jeremy Douglas Zechar;Maximilian Jonas Werner

  • A Synoptic View of the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3)

    Edward H. Field;Thomas H. Jordan;Morgan T. Page;Kevin R. Milner

  • Magnitude uncertainties impact seismic rate estimates, forecasts, and predictability experiments

    Maximilian J. Werner;Didier Sornette;Didier Sornette

  • Constraints on the size of the smallest triggering earthquake from the epidemic-type aftershock sequence model, Bath's law, and observed aftershock sequences

    Didier Sornette;Didier Sornette;Maximilian J. Werner

  • Constraints on the Size of the Smallest Triggering Earthquake from the ETAS Model, Baath's Law, and Observed Aftershock Sequences

    D. Sornette;M. J. Werner

  • Simulation of seismic events induced by CO2 injection at In Salah, Algeria

    James P. Verdon;Anna L. Stork;Rob C. Bissell;Clare E. Bond

  • The Forecasting Skill of Physics‐Based Seismicity Models during the 2010–2012 Canterbury, New Zealand, Earthquake Sequence

    Camilla Cattania;Maximilian J. Werner;Warner Marzocchi;Sebastian Hainzl

  • Prospective CSEP Evaluation of 1‐Day, 3‐Month, and 5‐Yr Earthquake Forecasts for Italy

    Matteo Taroni;Warner Marzocchi;Danijel Schorlemmer;Maximilian Werner

  • Pseudoprospective Evaluation of UCERF3‐ETAS Forecasts during the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence

    William J. Savran;Maximillian J. Werner;W. Marzocchi;David A. Rhoades

  • A Little Data goes a Long Way: Automating Seismic Phase Arrival Picking at Nabro Volcano with Transfer Learning

    Sacha Lapins;Berhe Goitom;J-Michael Kendall;Maximilian J. Werner

  • Improving Physics-Based Aftershock Forecasts During the 2016–2017 Central Italy Earthquake Cascade

    Simone Mancini;Simone Mancini;Margarita Segou;Maximilian Werner;Camilla Cattania

  • Stress transfer from opening hydraulic fractures controls the distribution of induced seismicity

    Tom Kettlety;James P Verdon;Maximilian J Werner;J M Kendall;J M Kendall

  • A search for evidence of secondary static stress triggering during the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers, California, earthquake sequence

    M.-A. Meier;M. J. Werner;J. Woessner;S. Wiemer

  • Retrospective Evaluation of the Five-Year and Ten-Year CSEP-Italy Earthquake Forecasts

    M.J. Werner;J.D. Zechar;W. Marzocchi;S. Wiemer

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas H. Jordan
Thomas H. Jordan University of Southern California
Stefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service
David A. Rhoades
David A. Rhoades GNS Science
Warner Marzocchi
Warner Marzocchi University of Naples Federico II
Agnès Helmstetter
Agnès Helmstetter Grenoble Alpes University
David D. Jackson
David D. Jackson University of California, Los Angeles
J-M Kendall
J-M Kendall University of Oxford
Yan Y. Kagan
Yan Y. Kagan University of California, Los Angeles
Juliet Biggs
Juliet Biggs University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Earth Science, there are diverse online degree options that cater to different career goals. Veterans, for example, can explore specialized programs such as online photography degrees for veterans, offering creative skills that complement scientific observation and fieldwork.

Language skills are increasingly valuable in global science and communication roles. Affordable options like the cheapest online Spanish degree programs provide practical language training, while tailored options such as the veteran friendly online Spanish degree can support former military members in pursuing new civilian careers.

For those blending art with science, visual arts degrees remain a strong option. The online MFA visual arts programs offer an affordable pathway to enhance technical and creative abilities, which can be valuable in environmental design and educational materials related to Earth Science.

Exploring these related degrees can open new doors and strengthen career prospects in both traditional and emerging fields connected to Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian J. Werner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles