What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- Seismology
- Civil engineering
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Seismology, Induced seismicity, Magnitude, Pore water pressure and Aftershock.
His research in Seismology intersects with topics in Enhanced geothermal system and Borehole.
His Induced seismicity research includes elements of Data mining, Crust, Asperity, Power law and Spatial variability.
His Magnitude research incorporates elements of Radius, Econometrics and Range, Anomaly, Statistics.
His Pore water pressure study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Geothermal gradient, Spatial distribution, Caldera and Permeability.
His Aftershock course of study focuses on Slip and Stress field, Dynamic stress and Principal stress.
His most cited work include:
- Minimum Magnitude of Completeness in Earthquake Catalogs: Examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan (845 citations)
- A Software Package to Analyze Seismicity: ZMAP (645 citations)
- Assessing the Quality of Earthquake Catalogues: Estimating the Magnitude of Completeness and Its Uncertainty (584 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stefan Wiemer spends much of his time researching Seismology, Induced seismicity, Aftershock, Magnitude and Geothermal gradient.
Seismology is closely attributed to Crust in his research.
His Induced seismicity research integrates issues from Geothermal energy, Enhanced geothermal system, Probabilistic logic, Probabilistic forecasting and Slip.
His research on Aftershock focuses in particular on Foreshock.
His research integrates issues of Range, Statistics and Geodesy in his study of Magnitude.
Seismic hazard is closely attributed to Seismic risk in his study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Seismology (56.73%)
- Induced seismicity (50.00%)
- Aftershock (14.33%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Seismology (56.73%)
- Induced seismicity (50.00%)
- Geothermal gradient (11.70%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Seismology, Induced seismicity, Geothermal gradient, Aftershock and Petrology are his primary areas of study.
His work in Seismology addresses subjects such as Relocation, which are connected to disciplines such as Crust and Hypocenter.
His Induced seismicity research includes themes of Slip, Geothermal energy, Natural and Magnitude.
His Magnitude study incorporates themes from Predictability and Geomorphology.
The concepts of his Geothermal gradient study are interwoven with issues in Geochemistry, Seismic hazard, Borehole and Petroleum engineering.
His work deals with themes such as Water injection, Fault and Permeability, which intersect with Petrology.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Real-time discrimination of earthquake foreshocks and aftershocks (44 citations)
- Hydraulic stimulation and fluid circulation experiments in underground laboratories: Stepping up the scale towards engineered geothermal systems (14 citations)
- Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock (14 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- Seismology
- Artificial intelligence
His primary scientific interests are in Induced seismicity, Seismology, Geothermal energy, Geothermal gradient and Seismic hazard.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Rock mass classification, Shear, Petrology, San andreas fault and Slip.
His Seismology research incorporates themes from Poisson distribution and Predictability.
His Geothermal energy study combines topics in areas such as Induced seismicity in Basel, Earthquake statistics and Earthquake detection.
Stefan Wiemer has included themes like Borehole, Permeability and Petroleum engineering in his Geothermal gradient study.
Stefan Wiemer combines subjects such as Degrees of freedom and Risk analysis with his study of Seismic hazard.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
