World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bogdan Enescu

Bogdan Enescu

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
34
Citations
3710
World Ranking
8089
National Ranking
246

Bogdan Enescu publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bogdan Enescu sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 166 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Bogdan Enescu D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bogdan Enescu sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bogdan Enescu is affiliated with Kyoto University in Japan and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, focusing primarily on geophysics and seismology. Their research spans various subfields including geophysics, artificial intelligence applications in earth sciences, building and construction, signal processing, and earth-surface processes.

Their work covers a broad spectrum of scientific topics that include:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Earthquake detection and analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Seismology and earthquake studies
  • Geological and geochemical analysis
  • Geological formations and processes exploration
  • Geological and geophysical studies worldwide

Bogdan Enescu has published in a range of prominent scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Earth Planets and Space
  • Scientific Reports
  • Preprints.org
  • Geophysical Journal International

Among notable recent publications are:

  • "Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "A multiple asymmetric bilateral rupture sequence derived from the peculiar tele-seismic P-waves of the 2025 Mandalay, Myanmar earthquake," 2025, Seismica
  • "The missing craton edge: Crustal structure of the East European Craton beneath the Carpathian Orogen revealed by double-difference tomography," 2020, Global and Planetary Change
  • "Revisiting Vrancea (Romania) Intermediate-Depth Seismicity: Some Statistical Characteristics and Seismic Quiescence Testing," 2023, Geosciences
  • "Barrier-Induced Rupture Front Disturbances during the 2023 Morocco Earthquake," 2024, Seismological Research Letters

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, which includes:

  • Ryo Okuwaki
  • Yuji Yagi
  • Mircea Rădulian
  • Like An
  • Cristian Ghita

Bogdan Enescu's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating seismological methods and advanced analytical tools, including artificial intelligence, to address complex geological phenomena. Their focus on earthquake detection, rupture mechanics, and the geophysical characterization of crustal structures contributes to advancing understanding in earth sciences.

Best Publications

  • Randomness of megathrust earthquakes implied by rapid stress recovery after the Japan earthquake

    Thessa Tormann;Bogdan Enescu;Jochen Woessner;Stefan Wiemer

  • Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust

    M. Spada;M. Spada;T. Tormann;S. Wiemer;B. Enescu

  • Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1999 M 7.4 İzmit earthquake from GPS measurements

    Li-Feng Wang;Rongjiang Wang;Frank Roth;B. Enescu

  • Rupture process of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in relation to the thermal structure around Aso volcano

    Yuji Yagi;Ryo Okuwaki;Bogdan Enescu;Amato Kasahara

  • Decay and expansion of the early aftershock activity following the 2011, Mw9.0 Tohoku earthquake

    Olivier Lengliné;Olivier Lengliné;Bogdan Enescu;Zhigang Peng;K. Shiomi

  • Quantifying early aftershock activity of the 2004 mid-Niigata Prefecture earthquake (Mw6.6)

    Bogdan Enescu;Jim Mori;Masatoshi Miyazawa

  • The Effect of a Mainshock on the Size Distribution of the Aftershocks

    Laura Gulia;Antonio Pio Rinaldi;Thessa Tormann;Gianfranco Vannucci

  • Some premonitory phenomena of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake: seismicity, b-value and fractal dimension

    Bogdan Enescu;Kiyoshi Ito

  • Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 Western Tottori earthquake

    Bogdan Enescu;Kiyoshi Ito

  • A retrospective comparative forecast test on the 1992 Landers sequence

    J. Woessner;S. Hainzl;W. Marzocchi;Maximilian J Werner;Maximilian J Werner

  • Aftershock modeling based on uncertain stress calculations

    S. Hainzl;B. Enescu;M. Cocco;J. Woessner

  • Omori-Utsu Law c-Values Associated with Recent Moderate Earthquakes in Japan

    Bogdan Enescu;Jim Mori;Masatoshi Miyazawa;Yasuyuki Kano

  • Rupture process of the 2014 Iquique Chile Earthquake in relation with the foreshock activity

    Yuji Yagi;Ryo Okuwaki;Bogdan Enescu;Shiro Hirano

  • Impact of Earthquake Rupture Extensions on Parameter Estimations of Point-Process Models

    Sebastian Hainzl;A. Christophersen;B. Enescu

  • Sensitivity study of forecasted aftershock seismicity based on Coulomb stress calculation and rate- and state-dependent frictional response

    M. Cocco;S. Hainzl;F. Catalli;B. Enescu

  • A Global Search for Triggered Tremor Following the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku Earthquake

    Kevin Chao;Zhigang Peng;Hector Gonzalez‐Huizar;Chastity Aiken

  • Delamination or slab detachment beneath Vrancea? New arguments from local earthquake tomography

    Ivan Koulakov;Bogdan Zaharia;Bogdan Enescu;M. Radulian

  • Correlations of Seismicity Patterns in Southern California with Surface Heat Flow Data

    Bogdan Enescu;Sebastian Hainzl;Yehuda Ben-Zion

  • Recurrent slow slip event likely hastened by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

    Hitoshi Hirose;Hisanori Kimura;Bogdan Enescu;Shin Aoi

  • Rate/state Coulomb stress transfer model for the CSEP Japan seismicity forecast

    Shinji Toda;Bogdan Enescu

  • Decay of aftershock activity for Japanese earthquakes

    K. Z. Nanjo;B. Enescu;R. Shcherbakov;D. L. Turcotte

  • The effect of a mainshock on the size distribution of the aftershocks

    Laura Gulia;Thessa Tormann;Antonio Pio Rinaldi;Gianfranco Vannucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Hainzl
Sebastian Hainzl University of Potsdam
Stefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service
Jim Mori
Jim Mori Kyoto University
Kazushige Obara
Kazushige Obara University of Tokyo
Massimo Cocco
Massimo Cocco National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Yosihiko Ogata
Yosihiko Ogata The Institute of Statistical Mathematics
Zhigang Peng
Zhigang Peng Georgia Institute of Technology
Kazuyuki Aihara
Kazuyuki Aihara University of Tokyo
Agnès Helmstetter
Agnès Helmstetter Grenoble Alpes University
David Marsan
David Marsan Université Savoie Mont Blanc

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students complement their technical knowledge by exploring programs such as online mfa programs, which foster creative skills that can enhance communication and public outreach in environmental fields.

For those interested in organizational roles within environmental agencies or corporations, pursuing an online masters degree in human resource management is a strategic choice. It equips Earth Science graduates with leadership and management expertise vital to navigating today’s workforce.

Moreover, educational flexibility is paramount, especially for mature learners. Programs highlighted as one year degrees for seniors offer accelerated pathways that can appeal to those seeking to upskill or transition careers without lengthy commitments.

Finally, those aiming to specialize in information management within environmental research may find value in ala mlis programs. These degrees develop competencies in organizing and curating scientific data, an increasingly important asset in Earth Science professions.

Best Scientists Citing Bogdan Enescu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles