World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bogdan Enescu

Bogdan Enescu

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 34 8089 7504 246 232 166 3710

Bogdan Enescu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bogdan Enescu between 1976 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bogdan Enescu published across 51 years, from 1976 to 2026, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2016. 12 of the 182 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2016. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1976 2026

182 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bogdan Enescu: publications per year, 1976 to 2026
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 0
2001 1
2002 4
2003 2
2004 4
2005 7
2006 10
2007 5
2008 6
2009 13
2010 6
2011 11
2012 8
2013 9
2014 8
2015 8
2016 17
2017 5
2018 10
2019 4
2020 1
2021 6
2022 2
2023 4
2024 11
2025 11
2026 1
Total 182
Download as CSV

Bogdan Enescu publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bogdan Enescu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 158–167 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 166 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458 166
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Bogdan Enescu D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bogdan Enescu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366 34
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bogdan Enescu is affiliated with Kyoto University in Japan and has contributed extensively to the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, focusing primarily on geophysics and seismology. Their research spans various subfields including geophysics, artificial intelligence applications in earth sciences, building and construction, signal processing, and earth-surface processes.

Their work covers a broad spectrum of scientific topics that include:

  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Earthquake detection and analysis
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Seismology and earthquake studies
  • Geological and geochemical analysis
  • Geological formations and processes exploration
  • Geological and geophysical studies worldwide

Bogdan Enescu has published in a range of prominent scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Earth Planets and Space
  • Scientific Reports
  • Preprints.org
  • Geophysical Journal International

Among notable recent publications are:

  • "Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence," 2023, Scientific Reports
  • "A multiple asymmetric bilateral rupture sequence derived from the peculiar tele-seismic P-waves of the 2025 Mandalay, Myanmar earthquake," 2025, Seismica
  • "The missing craton edge: Crustal structure of the East European Craton beneath the Carpathian Orogen revealed by double-difference tomography," 2020, Global and Planetary Change
  • "Revisiting Vrancea (Romania) Intermediate-Depth Seismicity: Some Statistical Characteristics and Seismic Quiescence Testing," 2023, Geosciences
  • "Barrier-Induced Rupture Front Disturbances during the 2023 Morocco Earthquake," 2024, Seismological Research Letters

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, which includes:

  • Ryo Okuwaki
  • Yuji Yagi
  • Mircea Rădulian
  • Like An
  • Cristian Ghita

Bogdan Enescu's research reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating seismological methods and advanced analytical tools, including artificial intelligence, to address complex geological phenomena. Their focus on earthquake detection, rupture mechanics, and the geophysical characterization of crustal structures contributes to advancing understanding in earth sciences.

Best Publications

  • Randomness of megathrust earthquakes implied by rapid stress recovery after the Japan earthquake

    Thessa Tormann;Bogdan Enescu;Jochen Woessner;Stefan Wiemer

  • Generic dependence of the frequency-size distribution of earthquakes on depth and its relation to the strength profile of the crust

    M. Spada;M. Spada;T. Tormann;S. Wiemer;B. Enescu

  • Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 1999 M 7.4 İzmit earthquake from GPS measurements

    Li-Feng Wang;Rongjiang Wang;Frank Roth;B. Enescu

  • Rupture process of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in relation to the thermal structure around Aso volcano

    Yuji Yagi;Ryo Okuwaki;Bogdan Enescu;Amato Kasahara

  • Decay and expansion of the early aftershock activity following the 2011, Mw9.0 Tohoku earthquake

    Olivier Lengliné;Olivier Lengliné;Bogdan Enescu;Zhigang Peng;K. Shiomi

  • Quantifying early aftershock activity of the 2004 mid-Niigata Prefecture earthquake (Mw6.6)

    Bogdan Enescu;Jim Mori;Masatoshi Miyazawa

  • The Effect of a Mainshock on the Size Distribution of the Aftershocks

    Laura Gulia;Antonio Pio Rinaldi;Thessa Tormann;Gianfranco Vannucci

  • Some premonitory phenomena of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake: seismicity, b-value and fractal dimension

    Bogdan Enescu;Kiyoshi Ito

  • Spatial analysis of the frequency-magnitude distribution and decay rate of aftershock activity of the 2000 Western Tottori earthquake

    Bogdan Enescu;Kiyoshi Ito

  • A retrospective comparative forecast test on the 1992 Landers sequence

    J. Woessner;S. Hainzl;W. Marzocchi;Maximilian J Werner;Maximilian J Werner

  • Aftershock modeling based on uncertain stress calculations

    S. Hainzl;B. Enescu;M. Cocco;J. Woessner

  • Omori-Utsu Law c-Values Associated with Recent Moderate Earthquakes in Japan

    Bogdan Enescu;Jim Mori;Masatoshi Miyazawa;Yasuyuki Kano

  • Rupture process of the 2014 Iquique Chile Earthquake in relation with the foreshock activity

    Yuji Yagi;Ryo Okuwaki;Bogdan Enescu;Shiro Hirano

  • Impact of Earthquake Rupture Extensions on Parameter Estimations of Point-Process Models

    Sebastian Hainzl;A. Christophersen;B. Enescu

  • Sensitivity study of forecasted aftershock seismicity based on Coulomb stress calculation and rate- and state-dependent frictional response

    M. Cocco;S. Hainzl;F. Catalli;B. Enescu

  • A Global Search for Triggered Tremor Following the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku Earthquake

    Kevin Chao;Zhigang Peng;Hector Gonzalez‐Huizar;Chastity Aiken

  • Delamination or slab detachment beneath Vrancea? New arguments from local earthquake tomography

    Ivan Koulakov;Bogdan Zaharia;Bogdan Enescu;M. Radulian

  • Correlations of Seismicity Patterns in Southern California with Surface Heat Flow Data

    Bogdan Enescu;Sebastian Hainzl;Yehuda Ben-Zion

  • Recurrent slow slip event likely hastened by the 2011 Tohoku earthquake

    Hitoshi Hirose;Hisanori Kimura;Bogdan Enescu;Shin Aoi

  • Rate/state Coulomb stress transfer model for the CSEP Japan seismicity forecast

    Shinji Toda;Bogdan Enescu

  • Decay of aftershock activity for Japanese earthquakes

    K. Z. Nanjo;B. Enescu;R. Shcherbakov;D. L. Turcotte

  • The effect of a mainshock on the size distribution of the aftershocks

    Laura Gulia;Thessa Tormann;Antonio Pio Rinaldi;Gianfranco Vannucci

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Hainzl
Sebastian Hainzl University of Potsdam
Stefan Wiemer
Stefan Wiemer Swiss Seismological Service
Jim Mori
Jim Mori Kyoto University
Kazushige Obara
Kazushige Obara University of Tokyo
Massimo Cocco
Massimo Cocco National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology
Yosihiko Ogata
Yosihiko Ogata The Institute of Statistical Mathematics
Zhigang Peng
Zhigang Peng Georgia Institute of Technology
Kazuyuki Aihara
Kazuyuki Aihara University of Tokyo
Agnès Helmstetter
Agnès Helmstetter Grenoble Alpes University
David Marsan
David Marsan Université Savoie Mont Blanc

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career pathways. Many students complement their technical knowledge by exploring programs such as online mfa programs, which foster creative skills that can enhance communication and public outreach in environmental fields.

For those interested in organizational roles within environmental agencies or corporations, pursuing an online masters degree in human resource management is a strategic choice. It equips Earth Science graduates with leadership and management expertise vital to navigating today’s workforce.

Moreover, educational flexibility is paramount, especially for mature learners. Programs highlighted as one year degrees for seniors offer accelerated pathways that can appeal to those seeking to upskill or transition careers without lengthy commitments.

Finally, those aiming to specialize in information management within environmental research may find value in ala mlis programs. These degrees develop competencies in organizing and curating scientific data, an increasingly important asset in Earth Science professions.

Best Scientists Citing Bogdan Enescu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles