World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
48
Citations
11802
World Ranking
3734
National Ranking
1466

Andrew J. Michael publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Michael sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 121 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Andrew J. Michael D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew J. Michael sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Seismology
  • Fault

His primary scientific interests are in Seismology, Fault, Induced seismicity, Stress field and Focal mechanism. As part of his studies on Seismology, Andrew J. Michael frequently links adjacent subjects like Geodesy. His Fault research incorporates themes from Moment, Point, Large earthquakes and Inversion.

Andrew J. Michael interconnects Volcano, Magnitude and Seismic wave in the investigation of issues within Induced seismicity. His Stress field research includes themes of Slickenside, Nappe, Inversion and Foreland basin. His Inversion research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Range, Earthquake rupture and Scaling.

His most cited work include:

  • Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake (695 citations)
  • Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds (576 citations)
  • Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study (467 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Andrew J. Michael focuses on Seismology, Aftershock, Induced seismicity, Fault and Seismic hazard. Andrew J. Michael regularly links together related areas like Magnitude in his Seismology studies. His Aftershock study combines topics in areas such as Stress field, Statistical seismology, Sequence and Cluster analysis.

His Induced seismicity research focuses on Earthquake prediction and how it connects with Earthquake scenario. Andrew J. Michael combines subjects such as Inversion and Inversion with his study of Fault. His Seismic hazard study incorporates themes from Geological survey, Aseismic creep and Tectonophysics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Seismology (74.31%)
  • Aftershock (32.11%)
  • Induced seismicity (22.94%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Seismology (74.31%)
  • Aftershock (32.11%)
  • Seismic hazard (11.01%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Seismology, Aftershock, Seismic hazard, Induced seismicity and Sequence. Andrew J. Michael performs multidisciplinary study in Seismology and Hazard in his work. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Aftershock, Sequence is strongly linked to Magnitude.

As part of the same scientific family, Andrew J. Michael usually focuses on Seismic hazard, concentrating on Geological survey and intersecting with Tectonics. Andrew J. Michael works on Induced seismicity which deals in particular with Earthquake forecasting. His work focuses on many connections between Earthquake rupture and other disciplines, such as Earthquake forecast, that overlap with his field of interest in Data mining.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • 2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes (69 citations)
  • 2016 one-year seismic hazard forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from induced and natural earthquakes (65 citations)
  • A Spatiotemporal Clustering Model for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3-ETAS): Toward an Operational Earthquake Forecast (51 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Seismology
  • Geometry

His main research concerns Seismology, Seismic hazard, Induced seismicity, Aftershock and Natural. Seismology is integrated with Hazard and Fluid pressure in his research. His work in Seismic hazard addresses subjects such as Geological survey, which are connected to disciplines such as Magnitude and Tectonics.

His study in Induced seismicity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Geothermal gradient and Earthquake rupture. His Earthquake rupture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Spatio temporal clustering, Probabilistic forecasting, Statistical seismology and Earthquake forecast. The concepts of his Aftershock study are interwoven with issues in Geothermal energy and Earthquake forecasting.

Best Publications

  • Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds

    Andrew J. Michael

  • Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake

    D. P. Hill;P.A. Reasenberg;A. Michael;W.J. Arabaz

  • Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study

    Andrew Jay Michael

  • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The Time‐Independent Model

    Edward H. Field;Ramon J. Arrowsmith;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird

  • Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake

    W. H. Bakun;B. Aagaard;B. Dost;W. L. Ellsworth

  • Damped regional-scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence

    Jeanne L. Hardebeck;Andrew J. Michael

  • Three-dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield Region, central California

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Andrew J. Michael

  • Space-time migration of earthquakes along the North Anatolian fault zone and seismic gaps

    M. N. Toksöz;A. F. Shakal;A. J. Michael

  • A shallow fault-zone structure illuminated by trapped waves in the Karadere–Duzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault, western Turkey

    Yehuda Ben-Zion;Zhigang Peng;David Okaya;Leonardo Seeber

  • Three-Dimensional Compressional Wavespeed Model, Earthquake Relocations, and Focal Mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, Region

    Clifford Thurber;Haijiang Zhang;Felix Waldhauser;Jeanne Hardebeck

  • Long‐Term Time‐Dependent Probabilities for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3)

    Edward H. Field;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E. Dawson

  • 2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes

    Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover

  • Stress field variations in the Swiss Alps and the northern Alpine foreland derived from inversion of fault plane solutions

    Ulrike Kastrup;Mary Lou Zoback;Nicholas Deichmann;Keith F. Evans

  • 2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes

    Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover

  • Relations Among Fault Behavior, Subsurface Geology, and Three-Dimensional Velocity Models

    Andrew J. Michael;Donna Eberhart-Phillips

  • Stress rotation during the Coalinga Aftershock Sequence

    Andrew Jay Michael

  • Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3): the time-independent model

    Edward H. Field;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E. Dawson

  • Spatial variations in stress within the 1987 Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence: New techniques and results

    Andrew J. Michael

  • Seismotectonics of the Loma Prieta, California, region determined from three-dimensional V p , V p / V s , and seismicity

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Andrew J. Michael

  • Quantitative analysis of seismic fault zone waves in the rupture zone of the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake: evidence for a shallow trapping structure

    Zhigang Peng;Yehuda Ben-Zion;Andrew J. Michael;Lupei Zhu

  • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time-independent model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1165

    Edward H Field;Glenn P Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E Dawson

  • Community online resource for statistical seismicity analysis

    J. Douglas Zechar;Jeanne L. Hardebeck;Andrew J. Michael;Mark Naylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne L. Hardebeck
Jeanne L. Hardebeck United States Geological Survey
Edward H. Field
Edward H. Field United States Geological Survey
Mark D. Petersen
Mark D. Petersen United States Geological Survey
William L. Ellsworth
William L. Ellsworth Stanford University
Thomas H. Jordan
Thomas H. Jordan University of Southern California
Charles S. Mueller
Charles S. Mueller United States Geological Survey
Arthur F. McGarr
Arthur F. McGarr United States Geological Survey
Bruce E. Shaw
Bruce E. Shaw Columbia University
Justin L. Rubinstein
Justin L. Rubinstein United States Geological Survey
Ray J. Weldon
Ray J. Weldon University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths and complementary fields. Many students consider online degree options to enhance their education while balancing other commitments. For those interested in language skills alongside science, programs like the cheapest online Spanish degree provide affordable ways to gain valuable communication skills that can support international research and collaboration.

Veterans looking to shift into Earth Science often benefit from tailored programs. The veteran friendly online Spanish degree exemplifies how specialized offerings can help military personnel transition smoothly into academic life, which also applies to various Earth Science courses.

For those interested in creative approaches within environmental studies, pursuing MFA online programs can blend scientific knowledge with art and media, opening careers in environmental communication, policy advocacy, and design.

Additionally, an accredited online masters degree in human resource management supports career advancement in managing Earth Science teams or organizations, emphasizing leadership and workforce development in scientific industries.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Michael

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles