World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
48
Citations
11802
World Ranking
3733
National Ranking
1466

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Seismology
  • Fault

His primary scientific interests are in Seismology, Fault, Induced seismicity, Stress field and Focal mechanism. As part of his studies on Seismology, Andrew J. Michael frequently links adjacent subjects like Geodesy. His Fault research incorporates themes from Moment, Point, Large earthquakes and Inversion.

Andrew J. Michael interconnects Volcano, Magnitude and Seismic wave in the investigation of issues within Induced seismicity. His Stress field research includes themes of Slickenside, Nappe, Inversion and Foreland basin. His Inversion research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Range, Earthquake rupture and Scaling.

His most cited work include:

  • Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake (695 citations)
  • Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds (576 citations)
  • Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study (467 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Andrew J. Michael focuses on Seismology, Aftershock, Induced seismicity, Fault and Seismic hazard. Andrew J. Michael regularly links together related areas like Magnitude in his Seismology studies. His Aftershock study combines topics in areas such as Stress field, Statistical seismology, Sequence and Cluster analysis.

His Induced seismicity research focuses on Earthquake prediction and how it connects with Earthquake scenario. Andrew J. Michael combines subjects such as Inversion and Inversion with his study of Fault. His Seismic hazard study incorporates themes from Geological survey, Aseismic creep and Tectonophysics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Seismology (74.31%)
  • Aftershock (32.11%)
  • Induced seismicity (22.94%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Seismology (74.31%)
  • Aftershock (32.11%)
  • Seismic hazard (11.01%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Seismology, Aftershock, Seismic hazard, Induced seismicity and Sequence. Andrew J. Michael performs multidisciplinary study in Seismology and Hazard in his work. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Aftershock, Sequence is strongly linked to Magnitude.

As part of the same scientific family, Andrew J. Michael usually focuses on Seismic hazard, concentrating on Geological survey and intersecting with Tectonics. Andrew J. Michael works on Induced seismicity which deals in particular with Earthquake forecasting. His work focuses on many connections between Earthquake rupture and other disciplines, such as Earthquake forecast, that overlap with his field of interest in Data mining.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • 2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes (69 citations)
  • 2016 one-year seismic hazard forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from induced and natural earthquakes (65 citations)
  • A Spatiotemporal Clustering Model for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3-ETAS): Toward an Operational Earthquake Forecast (51 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Seismology
  • Geometry

His main research concerns Seismology, Seismic hazard, Induced seismicity, Aftershock and Natural. Seismology is integrated with Hazard and Fluid pressure in his research. His work in Seismic hazard addresses subjects such as Geological survey, which are connected to disciplines such as Magnitude and Tectonics.

His study in Induced seismicity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Geothermal gradient and Earthquake rupture. His Earthquake rupture research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Spatio temporal clustering, Probabilistic forecasting, Statistical seismology and Earthquake forecast. The concepts of his Aftershock study are interwoven with issues in Geothermal energy and Earthquake forecasting.

Best Publications

  • Determination of stress from slip data: Faults and folds

    Andrew J. Michael

  • Seismicity Remotely Triggered by the Magnitude 7.3 Landers, California, Earthquake

    D. P. Hill;P.A. Reasenberg;A. Michael;W.J. Arabaz

  • Use of focal mechanisms to determine stress: A control study

    Andrew Jay Michael

  • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)—The Time‐Independent Model

    Edward H. Field;Ramon J. Arrowsmith;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird

  • Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake

    W. H. Bakun;B. Aagaard;B. Dost;W. L. Ellsworth

  • Damped regional-scale stress inversions: Methodology and examples for southern California and the Coalinga aftershock sequence

    Jeanne L. Hardebeck;Andrew J. Michael

  • Three-dimensional velocity structure, seismicity, and fault structure in the Parkfield Region, central California

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Andrew J. Michael

  • Space-time migration of earthquakes along the North Anatolian fault zone and seismic gaps

    M. N. Toksöz;A. F. Shakal;A. J. Michael

  • A shallow fault-zone structure illuminated by trapped waves in the Karadere–Duzce branch of the North Anatolian Fault, western Turkey

    Yehuda Ben-Zion;Zhigang Peng;David Okaya;Leonardo Seeber

  • Three-Dimensional Compressional Wavespeed Model, Earthquake Relocations, and Focal Mechanisms for the Parkfield, California, Region

    Clifford Thurber;Haijiang Zhang;Felix Waldhauser;Jeanne Hardebeck

  • Long‐Term Time‐Dependent Probabilities for the Third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3)

    Edward H. Field;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E. Dawson

  • 2017 One‐Year Seismic‐Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes

    Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover

  • Stress field variations in the Swiss Alps and the northern Alpine foreland derived from inversion of fault plane solutions

    Ulrike Kastrup;Mary Lou Zoback;Nicholas Deichmann;Keith F. Evans

  • 2018 One‐Year Seismic Hazard Forecast for the Central and Eastern United States from Induced and Natural Earthquakes

    Mark D. Petersen;Charles S. Mueller;Morgan P. Moschetti;Susan M. Hoover

  • Relations Among Fault Behavior, Subsurface Geology, and Three-Dimensional Velocity Models

    Andrew J. Michael;Donna Eberhart-Phillips

  • Stress rotation during the Coalinga Aftershock Sequence

    Andrew Jay Michael

  • Uniform California earthquake rupture forecast, version 3 (UCERF3): the time-independent model

    Edward H. Field;Glenn P. Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E. Dawson

  • Spatial variations in stress within the 1987 Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence: New techniques and results

    Andrew J. Michael

  • Seismotectonics of the Loma Prieta, California, region determined from three-dimensional V p , V p / V s , and seismicity

    Donna Eberhart-Phillips;Andrew J. Michael

  • Quantitative analysis of seismic fault zone waves in the rupture zone of the 1992 Landers, California, earthquake: evidence for a shallow trapping structure

    Zhigang Peng;Yehuda Ben-Zion;Andrew J. Michael;Lupei Zhu

  • Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, version 3 (UCERF3)—The time-independent model: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1165

    Edward H Field;Glenn P Biasi;Peter Bird;Timothy E Dawson

  • Community online resource for statistical seismicity analysis

    J. Douglas Zechar;Jeanne L. Hardebeck;Andrew J. Michael;Mark Naylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne L. Hardebeck
Jeanne L. Hardebeck United States Geological Survey
Edward H. Field
Edward H. Field United States Geological Survey
Mark D. Petersen
Mark D. Petersen United States Geological Survey
William L. Ellsworth
William L. Ellsworth Stanford University
Thomas H. Jordan
Thomas H. Jordan University of Southern California
Charles S. Mueller
Charles S. Mueller United States Geological Survey
Arthur F. McGarr
Arthur F. McGarr United States Geological Survey
Bruce E. Shaw
Bruce E. Shaw Columbia University
Justin L. Rubinstein
Justin L. Rubinstein United States Geological Survey
Ray J. Weldon
Ray J. Weldon University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths and complementary fields. Many students consider online degree options to enhance their education while balancing other commitments. For those interested in language skills alongside science, programs like the cheapest online Spanish degree provide affordable ways to gain valuable communication skills that can support international research and collaboration.

Veterans looking to shift into Earth Science often benefit from tailored programs. The veteran friendly online Spanish degree exemplifies how specialized offerings can help military personnel transition smoothly into academic life, which also applies to various Earth Science courses.

For those interested in creative approaches within environmental studies, pursuing MFA online programs can blend scientific knowledge with art and media, opening careers in environmental communication, policy advocacy, and design.

Additionally, an accredited online masters degree in human resource management supports career advancement in managing Earth Science teams or organizations, emphasizing leadership and workforce development in scientific industries.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew J. Michael

Trending Scientists