World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcel A. de Reus

Marcel A. de Reus

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
35
Citations
5204
World Ranking
831
National Ranking
10

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
5647
World Ranking
8991
National Ranking
245

Marcel A. de Reus publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel A. de Reus sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 49 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marcel A. de Reus D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel A. de Reus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Marcel A. de Reus is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their academic profile reflects an ongoing engagement within the university's research community.

Although recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, and specific fields or subfields of study are not listed for Marcel A. de Reus, the scientific career is associated with this established European research institution.

No awards or distinctions have been documented in available sources. The absence of specified recent publications or detailed topics indicates a limited public record of research outputs, at least within the accessible databases.

Given the available information, Marcel A. de Reus represents a scholar connected to Utrecht University who may be involved in academic or scientific activities not detailed in current bibliographic sources.

Best Publications

  • The Neonatal Connectome During Preterm Brain Development

    Martijn P. van den Heuvel;Karina J. Kersbergen;Marcel A. de Reus;Kristin Keunen

  • The parcellation-based connectome: Limitations and extensions

    Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • Estimating false positives and negatives in brain networks.

    Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • Generative models of the human connectome

    Richard F. Betzel;Andrea Avena-Koenigsberger;Joaquín Goñi;Ye He

  • Network-Level Structure-Function Relationships in Human Neocortex

    Bratislav Mišić;Richard F. Betzel;Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • Rich Club Organization and Intermodule Communication in the Cat Connectome

    Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • Connectome Disconnectivity and Cortical Gene Expression in Patients With Schizophrenia

    Ingrid A.C. Romme;Marcel A. de Reus;Roel A. Ophoff;Roel A. Ophoff;René S. Kahn

  • Impaired Rich Club Connectivity in Unaffected Siblings of Schizophrenia Patients

    Guusje Collin;René S. Kahn;Marcel A. de Reus;Wiepke Cahn

  • Linking Macroscale Graph Analytical Organization to Microscale Neuroarchitectonics in the Macaque Connectome

    Lianne H. Scholtens;Ruben Schmidt;Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • ENIGMA and the individual: Predicting factors that affect the brain in 35 countries worldwide.

    Paul M. Thompson;Ole A. Andreassen;Alejandro Arias-Vasquez;Carrie E. Bearden

  • Deep learning predictions of survival based on MRI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Hannelore K. van der Burgh;Ruben Schmidt;Henk Jan Westeneng;Marcel A. de Reus

  • Comparison of diffusion tractography and tract-tracing measures of connectivity strength in rhesus macaque connectome.

    Martijn P. van den Heuvel;Marcel A. de Reus;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Lianne H. Scholtens

  • Bridging Cytoarchitectonics and Connectomics in Human Cerebral Cortex.

    Martijn P. van den Heuvel;Lianne H. Scholtens;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Claus C. Hilgetag

  • Rich club organization supports a diverse set of functional network configurations.

    Mario Senden;Gustavo Deco;Marcel A. de Reus;Rainer Goebel

  • Correlation between structural and functional connectivity impairment in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Ruben Schmidt;Esther Verstraete;Marcel A. de Reus;Jan H. Veldink

  • An MRI Von Economo – Koskinas atlas

    Lianne H. Scholtens;Marcel A. de Reus;Siemon C. de Lange;Ruben Schmidt

  • Simulated rich club lesioning in brain networks: a scaffold for communication and integration?

    Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • The laplacian spectrum of neural networks

    Siemon C. de Lange;Marcel A. de Reus;Martijn P. van den Heuvel

  • Kuramoto model simulation of neural hubs and dynamic synchrony in the human cerebral connectome

    Ruben Schmidt;Karl J. R. LaFleur;Marcel A. de Reus;Leonard H. van den Berg

  • Disrupted functional brain networks in autistic toddlers

    Maria Boersma;Chantal Kemner;Marcel A. de Reus;Guusje Collin

  • Brain network analysis reveals affected connectome structure in bipolar I disorder.

    Guusje Collin;Martijn P. van den Heuvel;Lucija Abramovic;Annabel Vreeker

Frequent Co-Authors

Martijn P. van den Heuvel
Martijn P. van den Heuvel Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Richard F. Betzel
Richard F. Betzel Indiana University
Olaf Sporns
Olaf Sporns Indiana University
Xi-Nian Zuo
Xi-Nian Zuo Beijing Normal University
Leonard H. van den Berg
Leonard H. van den Berg Utrecht University
Patric Hagmann
Patric Hagmann University of Lausanne
Bratislav Misic
Bratislav Misic Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol
Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol Utrecht University
Roel A. Ophoff
Roel A. Ophoff University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees and exciting career pathways. Many students interested in brain science also consider advanced mental health fields. For instance, those who aim to become licensed psychologists might pursue psyd programs online. This provides a clinical foundation focused on patient care and behavioral health.

For students drawn to therapy roles, there are accelerated marriage and family therapy programs, designed to prepare graduates for counseling careers quickly and efficiently. These programs are ideal for those wanting to support families and relationships through evidence-based approaches.

If you're looking to build a foundation in neuroscience or a related area quickly, an online accelerated bachelor's degree can help you enter the workforce or move on to graduate education faster than traditional programs.

Considering future earnings is important as well. Those seeking the best degree in the world in terms of salary potential may want to research high-paying bachelors programs in neuroscience, health sciences, or related technical fields.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel A. de Reus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles