World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulrich Schotterer

Ulrich Schotterer

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
5703
World Ranking
8873
National Ranking
201

Ulrich Schotterer publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Schotterer sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 73 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ulrich Schotterer D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Schotterer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Schotterer is affiliated with the University of Bern in Switzerland, where the scientific contributions focus on research intersecting Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work has a particular emphasis on subfields including Earth-Surface Processes, Atmospheric Science, and Geochemistry and Petrology.

The research topics prominently addressed by Schotterer encompass Karst Systems and Hydrogeology, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, as well as Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry.

Their recent scholarly outputs include the following publications:

  • First results from alpine core drilling projects (2024), published in Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)
  • Isotope study in the alpine karst region of Rawil (Switzerland) (2024), published in Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern)

Ulrich Schotterer's collaborative work involves several frequent coauthors, notably:

  • H. Oeschger
  • B. Stauffer
  • Wilfried Haeberli
  • H Rothlisberger
  • H. W. Gäggeler

The majority of these publications appear in the Bern Open Repository and Information System of the University of Bern, indicating a strong connection with the institution's research dissemination channels.

Best Publications

  • A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature

    H. Oeschger;U. Siegenthaler;U. Schotterer;A. Gugelmann

  • Mass loss on Himalayan glacier endangers water resources

    Natalie M. Kehrwald;Lonnie G. Thompson;Yao Tandong;Ellen Mosley-Thompson

  • Radiocarbon Reservoir Effect and the Timing of the Late-Glacial/Early Holocene Humid Phase in the Atacama Desert (Northern Chile)

    Mebus A. Geyh;Martin Grosjean;Lautaro Núñez;Ulrich Schotterer

  • Influence of sublimation on stable isotope records recovered from high-altitude glaciers in the tropical Andes

    W. Stichler;U. Schotterer;K. Fröhlich;P. Ginot

  • Historical record of European emissions of heavy metals to the atmosphere since the 1650s from alpine snow/ice cores drilled near Monte Rosa.

    Carlo Barbante;Margit Schwikowski;Thomas Döring;Heinz W. Gäggeler

  • Temporal Changes of the 14C Reservoir Effect in Lakes

    Mebus A. Geyh;U. Schotterer;M. Grosjean

  • A new Andean deep ice core from Nevado Illimani (6350 m), Bolivia

    E Ramirez;G Hoffmann;J.D Taupin;B Francou

  • Coherent isotope history of Andean ice cores over the last century

    G. Hoffmann;E. Ramirez;E. Ramirez;Jean-Denis Taupin;Bernard Francou

  • Historical record of carbonaceous particle concentrations from a European high‐alpine glacier (Colle Gnifetti, Switzerland)

    V. M. H. Lavanchy;H. W. Gäggeler;U. Schotterer;M. Schwikowski

  • Deuterium and oxygen-18 in present-day precipitation: data and modelling

    J. Jouzel;K. Froehlich;U. Schotterer

  • Observation of isotopes in the water cycle—the Swiss National Network (NISOT)

    Marc Schürch;Ronald Kozel;Ulrich Schotterer;Jean-Pierre Tripet

  • Climate variability during the last 1000 years inferred from Andean ice cores: A review of methodology and recent results

    Françoise Vimeux;Françoise Vimeux;Patrick Ginot;Margit Schwikowski;Mathias Vuille

  • Reconstruction of past climates from stable isotope records of palaeo-precipitation preserved in continental archives*

    K. Rozanski;S. J. Johnsen;U. Schotterer;L. G. Thompson

  • A high-resolution air chemistry record from an Alpine ice core: Fiescherhorn glacier, Swiss Alps

    M. Schwikowski;S. Brütsch;H. W. Gäggeler;U. Schotterer

  • Mid- and late-Holocene limnogeology of Laguna del Negro Francisco, northern Chile, and its palaeoclimatic implications

    Martin Grosjean;Blas L. Valero-Garcés;Mebus A. Geyh;Bruno Messerli

  • Glaciochemical investigation of an ice core from Belukha glacier, Siberian Altai

    Susanne Olivier;Susanne Olivier;Margit Schwikowski;Sabina Brütsch;Stella Eyrikh

  • Anthropogenic versus natural sources of atmospheric sulphate from an Alpine ice core

    M. Schwikowski;A. Döscher;H. W. Gäggeler;U. Schotterer;U. Schotterer

  • The anthropogenic impact on snow chemistry at Colle Gnifetti, Swiss Alps

    D. Wagenbach;K.O. Münnich;U. Schotterer;H. Oeschger

  • Increase of 129I in the environment

    M.J.M. Wagner;B. Dittrich-Hannen;H.-A. Synal;M. Suter

  • A historical record of ammonium concentrations from a glacier in the Alps

    A. Döscher;H. W. Gäggeler;U. Schotterer;M. Schwikowski

  • Post-17th-century changes of European lead emissions recorded in high-altitude alpine snow and ice.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Heinz W. Gäggeler
Heinz W. Gäggeler Paul Scherrer Institute
Margit Schwikowski
Margit Schwikowski Paul Scherrer Institute
Lonnie G. Thompson
Lonnie G. Thompson The Ohio State University
Paolo Gabrielli
Paolo Gabrielli The Ohio State University
Martin Grosjean
Martin Grosjean University of Bern
Michel Stievenard
Michel Stievenard Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
Carlo Barbante
Carlo Barbante Ca Foscari University of Venice
Hans Oeschger
Hans Oeschger University of Bern
Dietmar Wagenbach
Dietmar Wagenbach Heidelberg University
Bryan G. Mark
Bryan G. Mark The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but many students also consider complementary degrees to enhance their skillset. For those interested in advancing their education, exploring eds to edd program options can provide valuable leadership and research skills applicable to environmental policy and education roles.

In the social sector, degrees like the fully funded dsw programs offer affordable pathways for professionals aiming to influence community health and sustainability from a social work perspective.

For students seeking flexibility and savings, pursuing a cheap online general studies degree can be a practical choice, providing a broad foundation that complements specialized environmental science knowledge.

Additionally, those new to higher education might consider the easiest bachelors degree programs to build confidence and complete foundational coursework before specializing in environmental fields.

Each of these pathways offers unique benefits, catering to different career goals and educational needs within the environmental sciences spectrum.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Schotterer

Trending Scientists