World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8416
World Ranking
5791
National Ranking
2107

Bryan G. Mark publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan G. Mark sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Bryan G. Mark D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan G. Mark sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bryan G. Mark is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science, with a focus on various subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Water Science and Technology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, which include:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
  • Climate variability and models
  • Landslides and related hazards

Their recent publications demonstrate a breadth of study, including:

  • "A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records," 2020, Scientific Data
  • "The deglaciation of the Americas during the Last Glacial Termination," 2020, Earth-Science Reviews
  • "Publisher Correction: A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records," 2020, Scientific Data
  • "Climate extremes and their impacts on agriculture across the Eastern Corn Belt Region of the U.S.," 2022, Weather and Climate Extremes
  • "Publisher Correction: A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records," 2020, Scientific Data

Bryan G. Mark has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Michel Baraër, Jeffrey M. McKenzie, Emilio Mateo, Alejo Cochachín Rapre, and David F. Porinchu. These collaborations reflect ongoing engagement in interdisciplinary research efforts.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in several key venues, with multiple publications in:

  • HydroShare Resources
  • Scientific Data
  • Quaternary Science Reviews
  • The Cryosphere
  • Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America

Bryan G. Mark has also contributed to book publications, with one titled The voices of glaciers: stories of grief and hope amidst shrinking glaciers in the tropics, scheduled for publication by UNESCO in 2025.

Best Publications

  • Climate change and tropical Andean glaciers: Past, present and future

    Mathias Vuille;Mathias Vuille;Bernard Francou;Patrick Wagnon;Irmgard Juen

  • Toward mountains without permanent snow and ice

    Matthias Huss;Matthias Huss;B Bookhagen;Christian Huggel;Dean Jacobsen

  • Glacier recession and water resources in Peru's Cordillera Blanca

    Michel Baraër;Bryan G. Mark;Jeffrey M. Mckenzie;Thomas Condom

  • Reconstruction of equilibrium-line altitudes for tropical and sub-tropical glaciers

    Douglas I. Benn;Lewis A. Owen;Henry A. Osmaston;Geoffrey O. Seltzer

  • Holocene paleohydrology and glacial history of the central Andes using multiproxy lake sediment studies

    Mark B Abbott;Brent B Wolfe;Alexander P Wolfe;Geoffrey O Seltzer

  • A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records

    Darrell Kaufman;Nicholas McKay;Cody Routson;Michael Erb

  • Tropical glacier meltwater contribution to stream discharge: a case study in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru

    Bryan G. Mark;Geoffrey O. Seltzer

  • Glacier recession and human vulnerability in the Yanamarey watershed of the Cordillera Blanca, Peru

    Jeffrey T. Bury;Bryan G. Mark;Jeffrey M. McKenzie;Adam French

  • Climate Change and Tropical Andean Glacier Recession: Evaluating Hydrologic Changes and Livelihood Vulnerability in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru

    Bryan G. Mark;Jeffrey Bury;Jeffrey M. McKenzie;Adam French

  • New Geographies of Water and Climate Change in Peru: Coupled Natural and Social Transformations in the Santa River Watershed

    Jeffrey Bury;Bryan G. Mark;Mark Carey;Kenneth R. Young

  • Evaluation of recent glacier recession in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru (AD 1962-1999): spatial distribution of mass loss and climatic forcing

    Bryan G. Mark;Geoffrey O. Seltzer

  • Glacier changes and climate trends derived from multiple sources in the data scarce Cordillera Vilcanota region, southern Peruvian Andes

    Nadine Salzmann;Nadine Salzmann;Christian Huggel;M Rohrer;W Silverio

  • Glacier loss on Kilimanjaro continues unabated

    L. G. Thompson;H. H. Brecher;E. Mosley-Thompson;D. R. Hardy

  • Toward hydro-social modeling: Merging human variables and the social sciences with climate-glacier runoff models (Santa River, Peru)

    Mark Carey;Michel Baraer;Bryan G. Mark;Adam French

  • Glaciation in the Andes during the Lateglacial and Holocene

    Donald T. Rodbell;Jacqueline A. Smith;Bryan G. Mark

  • Impacts of Glacier Recession and Declining Meltwater on Mountain Societies

    Mark Carey;Olivia C. Molden;Mattias Borg Rasmussen;M Jackson

  • Glacier loss and hydro-social risks in the Peruvian Andes

    Bryan G. Mark;Adam French;Michel Baraer;Mark Carey

  • Hydrochemical evaluation of changing glacier meltwater contribution to stream discharge: Callejon de Huaylas, Peru

    Bryan G. Mark;Jeffrey M. McKenzie;Jesús Gómez López

  • Tracing increasing tropical Andean glacier melt with stable isotopes in water.

    Bryan G. Mark;Jeffrey M. Mckenzie

  • Contribution of groundwater to the outflow from ungauged glacierized catchments: a multi-site study in the tropical Cordillera Blanca, Peru

    Michel Baraer;Jeffrey McKenzie;Bryan G. Mark;Ryan Gordon

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey M. McKenzie
Jeffrey M. McKenzie McGill University
Laura K. Lautz
Laura K. Lautz Syracuse University
Donald T. Rodbell
Donald T. Rodbell Union College
Geoffrey O. Seltzer
Geoffrey O. Seltzer Syracuse University
Michael Durand
Michael Durand The Ohio State University
Jeffrey C. Neal
Jeffrey C. Neal University of Bristol
Christian Huggel
Christian Huggel University of Zurich
Robert C. Finkel
Robert C. Finkel Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mathias Vuille
Mathias Vuille University at Albany, State University of New York
Rolf Weingartner
Rolf Weingartner University of Bern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students seek programs that balance academic rigor with flexibility, which is why some opt for easier online options. To find such programs, you might consider reviewing easiest bachelors degree offerings that still provide valuable knowledge applicable to environmental fields.

Specialized disciplines like geology are closely linked to environmental science careers. Pursuing a geology online degree can deepen your understanding of earth processes, essential for roles in resource management, conservation, and environmental assessment.

Another growing area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which is vital for spatial analysis and environmental planning. Advanced learners may explore top gis masters programs to gain expertise in mapping technologies and data management, skills highly sought after by employers.

Additionally, for those interested in leadership roles within environmental policy and administration, earning a degree quickly without compromising quality is appealing. One can explore 1 year mpa online options for a fast-track Master of Public Administration, aligning governance skills with environmental initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Bryan G. Mark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles