World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
33
Citations
4290
World Ranking
9556
National Ranking
213

Nadine Salzmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Nadine Salzmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadine Salzmann is affiliated with the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions to several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Geophysics, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's published work encompasses a range of topics related to climate and environmental dynamics. These main topics include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Among Salzmann's recent papers are:

  • Towards improved understanding of cascading and interconnected risks from concurrent weather extremes: Analysis of historical heat and drought extreme events (2022, PLOS Climate)
  • Spatio-temporal reconstruction of winter glacier mass balance in the Alps, Scandinavia, Central Asia and western Canada (1981-2019) using climate reanalyses and machine learning (2023, The Cryosphere)
  • Characterising the coincidence of soil moisture - precipitation extremes as a possible precursor to European floods (2023, Journal of Hydrology)
  • Can Weather Radars Be Used to Estimate Snow Accumulation on Alpine Glaciers? An Evaluation Based on Glaciological Surveys (2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology)
  • Continuous Spatio-Temporal High-Resolution Estimates of SWE Across the Swiss Alps - A Statistical Two-Step Approach for High-Mountain Topography (2021, Frontiers in Earth Science)

Salzmann frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Christian Huggel
  • Veruska Muccione
  • Raphael Neukom
  • Matteo Guidicelli
  • Marco Gabella

Their publications are often found in established venues such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Cryosphere
  • Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Natural Hazards
  • PLOS Climate

Best Publications

  • Rapid decline of snow and ice in the tropical Andes – Impacts, uncertainties and challenges ahead

    Mathias Vuille;Mark Carey;Christian Huggel;Wouter Buytaert

  • Remote sensing of glacier- and permafrost-related hazards in high mountains: an overview

    A. Kääb;C. Huggel;L. Fischer;S. Guex

  • Estimating the volume of glaciers in the Himalayan–Karakoram region using different methods

    H. Frey;Horst Machguth;Matthias Huss;C. Huggel

  • Three‐dimensional distribution and evolution of permafrost temperatures in idealized high‐mountain topography

    Jeannette Noetzli;Stephan Gruber;Stephan Gruber;Thomas Kohl;Nadine Salzmann

  • Recent and future warm extreme events and high-mountain slope stability

    C. Huggel;N. Salzmann;N. Salzmann;S. Allen;S. Allen;Jacqueline Caplan-Auerbach

  • Climate trends and glacier retreat in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru, revisited

    Simone Schauwecker;Mario Rohrer;D Acuña;Alejo Cochachin

  • Glacier changes and climate trends derived from multiple sources in the data scarce Cordillera Vilcanota region, southern Peruvian Andes

    Nadine Salzmann;Nadine Salzmann;Christian Huggel;M Rohrer;W Silverio

  • High uncertainty in 21st century runoff projections from glacierized basins

    Matthias Huss;Matthias Huss;Michael Zemp;Philip C. Joerg;Nadine Salzmann

  • Facing unprecedented drying of the Central Andes? Precipitation variability over the period AD 1000–2100

    Raphael Neukom;Raphael Neukom;Mario Rohrer;Pierluigi Calanca;Nadine Salzmann;Nadine Salzmann

  • The application of Regional Climate Model output for the simulation of high-mountain permafrost scenarios

    Nadine Salzmann;Christoph Frei;Pier Luigi Vidale;Martin Hoelzle

  • Re-analysis of seasonal mass balance at Abramov glacier 1968-2014

    Martina Barandun;Matthias Huss;Leo Sold;Daniel Farinotti

  • GIS‐based modeling of glacial hazards and their interactions using Landsat‐TM and IKONOS imagery

    Christian Huggel;Andreas Kääb;Nadine Salzmann

  • A framework for the science contribution in climate adaptation: Experiences from science-policy processes in the Andes

    Christian Huggel;Marlene Scheel;Franziska Albrecht;Franziska Albrecht;Norina Andres

  • The freezing level in the tropical Andes, Peru: An indicator for present and future glacier extents

    Simone Schauwecker;Mario Rohrer;Christian Huggel;Jason Endries

  • Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing and GIS‐modelling

    Nadine Salzmann;Andreas Kääb;Christian Huggel;Britta Allgöwer

  • Recent glacier and lake changes in High Mountain Asia and their relation to precipitation changes

    Désirée Silvana Treichler;Andreas Max Kääb;Nadine Salzmann;Chong-Yu Xu

  • Remotely sensed debris thickness mapping of Bara Shigri Glacier, Indian Himalaya

    Simone Marianna Schauwecker;Mario Bruno Rohrer;Christian Huggel;Anil Kulkarni

  • Robust climate scenarios for sites with sparse observations: a two-step bias correction approach

    Jan Rajczak;Sven Kotlarski;Nadine Salzmann;Christoph Schär

  • Missing (in-situ) snow cover data hampers climate change and runoff studies in the Greater Himalayas.

    Mario Rohrer;Nadine Salzmann;Markus Stoffel;Markus Stoffel;Anil V. Kulkarni

  • Modeled sensitivity of two alpine permafrost sites to RCM‐based climate scenarios

    Martin Scherler;Christian Hauck;Martin Hoelzle;Nadine Salzmann

  • Continuous and autonomous snow water equivalent measurements by a cosmic ray sensor on an alpine glacier

    Rebecca Gugerli;Nadine Salzmann;Matthias Huss;Matthias Huss;Darin Desilets

  • Climate Change and Permafrost

    Nadine Salzmann;Isabelle Gärtner-Roer

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Huggel
Christian Huggel University of Zurich
Matthias Huss
Matthias Huss University of Fribourg
Martin Hoelzle
Martin Hoelzle University of Fribourg
Horst Machguth
Horst Machguth University of Fribourg
Markus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel University of Geneva
Raphael Neukom
Raphael Neukom University of Bern
Wilfried Haeberli
Wilfried Haeberli University of Zurich
Michael Zemp
Michael Zemp University of Zurich
Christian Hauck
Christian Hauck University of Fribourg
Holger Frey
Holger Frey University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their career in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable opportunities. Many professionals choose to pursue advanced education through flexible programs like online edd programs no dissertation, which allow for a focus on leadership and applied research without the lengthy dissertation process. These programs are ideal for individuals seeking to enhance their expertise while balancing professional commitments.

Additionally, those holding an education specialist degree often look to transition by enrolling in online eds to edd programs. These pathways enable educators and environmental science professionals to deepen their knowledge and impact in areas such as policy, management, and community engagement.

Another viable option for social work professionals involved in environmental justice is pursuing a dsw online programs. These affordable online doctorates prepare graduates for advanced roles in advocacy and program development, intersecting with environmental science goals.

For those entering the field or seeking a broad interdisciplinary approach, some of the cheapest online general studies degree programs offer a cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge and explore diverse topics related to environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Salzmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles