World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 33 9556 9148 213 203 117 4290

Nadine Salzmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nadine Salzmann between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nadine Salzmann published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2016. 5 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2016. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 12 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 2 publications
2003 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nadine Salzmann: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 4
2008 2
2009 8
2010 5
2011 1
2012 12
2013 11
2014 8
2015 10
2016 18
2017 9
2018 3
2019 6
2020 4
2021 4
2022 14
2023 6
2024 3
2025 2
Total 137
Download as CSV

Nadine Salzmann publications per year - data summary

  • Nadine Salzmann, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Fribourg, has 137 publications recorded across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2003 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2003 and 2011, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.0 per year counting only the 23 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 29 publications, 21% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2003-2010: 26 publications (3.3 per year); 2011-2018: 72 publications (9.0 per year); 2019-2025: 39 publications (5.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Nadine Salzmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 117 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541 117
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Nadine Salzmann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Nadine Salzmann, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Fribourg, records 117 publications - the 22nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 22% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Nadine Salzmann, and about 78% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Nadine Salzmann ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Nadine Salzmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadine Salzmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88 33
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Nadine Salzmann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Nadine Salzmann, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Fribourg, records 33 D-Index - the 2nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 2% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Nadine Salzmann, and about 98% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Nadine Salzmann ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Nadine Salzmann is affiliated with the University of Fribourg in Switzerland. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions to several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Geophysics, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's published work encompasses a range of topics related to climate and environmental dynamics. These main topics include:

  • Climate variability and models
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Among Salzmann's recent papers are:

  • Towards improved understanding of cascading and interconnected risks from concurrent weather extremes: Analysis of historical heat and drought extreme events (2022, PLOS Climate)
  • Spatio-temporal reconstruction of winter glacier mass balance in the Alps, Scandinavia, Central Asia and western Canada (1981-2019) using climate reanalyses and machine learning (2023, The Cryosphere)
  • Characterising the coincidence of soil moisture - precipitation extremes as a possible precursor to European floods (2023, Journal of Hydrology)
  • Can Weather Radars Be Used to Estimate Snow Accumulation on Alpine Glaciers? An Evaluation Based on Glaciological Surveys (2020, Journal of Hydrometeorology)
  • Continuous Spatio-Temporal High-Resolution Estimates of SWE Across the Swiss Alps - A Statistical Two-Step Approach for High-Mountain Topography (2021, Frontiers in Earth Science)

Salzmann frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Christian Huggel
  • Veruska Muccione
  • Raphael Neukom
  • Matteo Guidicelli
  • Marco Gabella

Their publications are often found in established venues such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Cryosphere
  • Weather and Climate Extremes
  • Natural Hazards
  • PLOS Climate

Best Publications

  • Rapid decline of snow and ice in the tropical Andes – Impacts, uncertainties and challenges ahead

    Mathias Vuille;Mark Carey;Christian Huggel;Wouter Buytaert

  • Remote sensing of glacier- and permafrost-related hazards in high mountains: an overview

    A. Kääb;C. Huggel;L. Fischer;S. Guex

  • Estimating the volume of glaciers in the Himalayan–Karakoram region using different methods

    H. Frey;Horst Machguth;Matthias Huss;C. Huggel

  • Three‐dimensional distribution and evolution of permafrost temperatures in idealized high‐mountain topography

    Jeannette Noetzli;Stephan Gruber;Stephan Gruber;Thomas Kohl;Nadine Salzmann

  • Recent and future warm extreme events and high-mountain slope stability

    C. Huggel;N. Salzmann;N. Salzmann;S. Allen;S. Allen;Jacqueline Caplan-Auerbach

  • Climate trends and glacier retreat in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru, revisited

    Simone Schauwecker;Mario Rohrer;D Acuña;Alejo Cochachin

  • Glacier changes and climate trends derived from multiple sources in the data scarce Cordillera Vilcanota region, southern Peruvian Andes

    Nadine Salzmann;Nadine Salzmann;Christian Huggel;M Rohrer;W Silverio

  • High uncertainty in 21st century runoff projections from glacierized basins

    Matthias Huss;Matthias Huss;Michael Zemp;Philip C. Joerg;Nadine Salzmann

  • Facing unprecedented drying of the Central Andes? Precipitation variability over the period AD 1000–2100

    Raphael Neukom;Raphael Neukom;Mario Rohrer;Pierluigi Calanca;Nadine Salzmann;Nadine Salzmann

  • The application of Regional Climate Model output for the simulation of high-mountain permafrost scenarios

    Nadine Salzmann;Christoph Frei;Pier Luigi Vidale;Martin Hoelzle

  • Re-analysis of seasonal mass balance at Abramov glacier 1968-2014

    Martina Barandun;Matthias Huss;Leo Sold;Daniel Farinotti

  • GIS‐based modeling of glacial hazards and their interactions using Landsat‐TM and IKONOS imagery

    Christian Huggel;Andreas Kääb;Nadine Salzmann

  • A framework for the science contribution in climate adaptation: Experiences from science-policy processes in the Andes

    Christian Huggel;Marlene Scheel;Franziska Albrecht;Franziska Albrecht;Norina Andres

  • The freezing level in the tropical Andes, Peru: An indicator for present and future glacier extents

    Simone Schauwecker;Mario Rohrer;Christian Huggel;Jason Endries

  • Assessment of the hazard potential of ice avalanches using remote sensing and GIS‐modelling

    Nadine Salzmann;Andreas Kääb;Christian Huggel;Britta Allgöwer

  • Recent glacier and lake changes in High Mountain Asia and their relation to precipitation changes

    Désirée Silvana Treichler;Andreas Max Kääb;Nadine Salzmann;Chong-Yu Xu

  • Remotely sensed debris thickness mapping of Bara Shigri Glacier, Indian Himalaya

    Simone Marianna Schauwecker;Mario Bruno Rohrer;Christian Huggel;Anil Kulkarni

  • Robust climate scenarios for sites with sparse observations: a two-step bias correction approach

    Jan Rajczak;Sven Kotlarski;Nadine Salzmann;Christoph Schär

  • Missing (in-situ) snow cover data hampers climate change and runoff studies in the Greater Himalayas.

    Mario Rohrer;Nadine Salzmann;Markus Stoffel;Markus Stoffel;Anil V. Kulkarni

  • Modeled sensitivity of two alpine permafrost sites to RCM‐based climate scenarios

    Martin Scherler;Christian Hauck;Martin Hoelzle;Nadine Salzmann

  • Continuous and autonomous snow water equivalent measurements by a cosmic ray sensor on an alpine glacier

    Rebecca Gugerli;Nadine Salzmann;Matthias Huss;Matthias Huss;Darin Desilets

  • Climate Change and Permafrost

    Nadine Salzmann;Isabelle Gärtner-Roer

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Huggel
Christian Huggel University of Zurich
Matthias Huss
Matthias Huss University of Fribourg
Martin Hoelzle
Martin Hoelzle University of Fribourg
Horst Machguth
Horst Machguth University of Fribourg
Markus Stoffel
Markus Stoffel University of Geneva
Raphael Neukom
Raphael Neukom University of Bern
Wilfried Haeberli
Wilfried Haeberli University of Zurich
Michael Zemp
Michael Zemp University of Zurich
Christian Hauck
Christian Hauck University of Fribourg
Holger Frey
Holger Frey University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their career in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can provide valuable opportunities. Many professionals choose to pursue advanced education through flexible programs like online edd programs no dissertation, which allow for a focus on leadership and applied research without the lengthy dissertation process. These programs are ideal for individuals seeking to enhance their expertise while balancing professional commitments.

Additionally, those holding an education specialist degree often look to transition by enrolling in online eds to edd programs. These pathways enable educators and environmental science professionals to deepen their knowledge and impact in areas such as policy, management, and community engagement.

Another viable option for social work professionals involved in environmental justice is pursuing a dsw online programs. These affordable online doctorates prepare graduates for advanced roles in advocacy and program development, intersecting with environmental science goals.

For those entering the field or seeking a broad interdisciplinary approach, some of the cheapest online general studies degree programs offer a cost-effective way to gain foundational knowledge and explore diverse topics related to environmental issues.

Best Scientists Citing Nadine Salzmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles