World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
89
Citations
33880
World Ranking
12564
National Ranking
407

Richard L. Prince publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Prince sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 540 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard L. Prince D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Prince sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Prince is affiliated with the University of Western Australia in Australia. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Nephrology, and Physiology.

The research topics covered by Richard L. Prince include:

  • Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Vitamin K Research Studies
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Hip and Femur Fractures

Their frequent publication venues consist of:

  • Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A
  • Heart
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
  • Food & Function

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard L. Prince include:

  • Joshua R. Lewis
  • Marc Sim
  • Kun Zhu
  • Jonathan M. Hodgson
  • Wai H. Lim

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard L. Prince demonstrate a diverse focus on cardiovascular and bone health topics:

  • Prognostic Value of Abdominal Aortic Calcification: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies, 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Prognostic Value of Cardiovascular Biomarkers in the Population, 2024, JAMA
  • Frailty increases the long-term risk for fall and fracture-related hospitalizations and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older women, 2024, Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
  • The effects of vitamin K-rich green leafy vegetables on bone metabolism: A 4-week randomised controlled trial in middle-aged and older individuals, 2020, Bone Reports
  • Machine learning for abdominal aortic calcification assessment from bone density machine-derived lateral spine images, 2023, EBioMedicine

Best Publications

  • Effect of Parathyroid Hormone (1-34) on Fractures and Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis

    Robert M. Neer;Claude D. Arnaud;Jose R. Zanchetta;Richard Prince

  • Hypovitaminosis D in Medical Inpatients

    Melissa K. Thomas;Donald M. Lloyd-Jones;Ravi I. Thadhani;Albert C. Shaw

  • Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 56 bone mineral density loci and reveals 14 loci associated with risk of fracture

    Karol Estrada;Unnur Styrkarsdottir;Evangelos Evangelou;Yi-Hsiang Hsu

  • Modelling in economic evaluation: an unavoidable fact of life.

    Martin J. Buxton;Michael F. Drummond;Ben A. Van Hout;Richard L. Prince

  • Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial.

    Jacques P. Brown;Richard L. Prince;Chad L Deal;Robert R. Recker

  • Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A comparative study of exercise, calcium supplementation, and hormone-replacement therapy.

    Prince Rl;Smith M;Dick Im;Price Ri

  • Exercise effects on bone mass in postmenopausal women are site‐specific and load‐dependent

    Deborah Kerr;Alan Morton;Ian Dick;Richard Prince

  • Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: Results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women

    Richard L. Prince;Amanda Devine;Satvinder S. Dhaliwal;Ian M. Dick

  • Whole-genome sequencing identifies EN1 as a determinant of bone density and fracture.

    Hou Feng Zheng;Vincenzo Forgetta;Yi Hsiang Hsu;Yi Hsiang Hsu;Karol Estrada

  • The effects of calcium supplementation (milk powder or tablets) and exercise on bone density in postmenopausal women.

    Prince R;Devine A;Dick I;Criddle A

  • A longitudinal study of the effect of sodium and calcium intakes on regional bone density in postmenopausal women.

    A. Devine;R.A. Criddle;I.M. Dick;D.A. Kerr

  • Recreational physical activity levels in healthy older women: the importance of fear of falling.

    David G. Bruce;Amanda Devine;Richard L. Prince;Richard L. Prince

  • Resistance training over 2 years increases bone mass in calcium-replete postmenopausal women.

    Deborah Kerr;Timothy Ackland;Barbara Maslen;Alan Morton

  • Fear of falling in older women: a longitudinal study of incidence, persistence, and predictors

    Nicole Austin;Amanda Devine;Ian Dick;Richard Prince

  • WNT16 Influences Bone Mineral Density, Cortical Bone Thickness, Bone Strength, and Osteoporotic Fracture Risk

    Hou-Feng Zheng;Jon H. Tobias;Emma Duncan;Emma Duncan;David M. Evans

  • Changes in muscle, fat and bone mass after 36 weeks of maximal androgen blockade for prostate cancer

    Daniel A. Galvão;Nigel A. Spry;Nigel A. Spry;Dennis R. Taaffe;Robert U. Newton

  • Genome-wide association study using extreme truncate selection identifies novel genes affecting bone mineral density and fracture risk.

    E.L. Duncan;P. Danoy;J.P. Kemp;P.J. Leo

  • Calcium supplementation and the risks of atherosclerotic vascular disease in older women: results of a 5-year RCT and a 4.5-year follow-up

    Joshua R Lewis;Joshua R Lewis;Janine Calver;Kun Zhu;Kun Zhu;Leon Flicker

  • A case-control study of quality of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture

    S.E. Hall;R.A. Criddle;T.L. Comito;Richard Prince

  • Sustained nonvertebral fragility fracture risk reduction after discontinuation of teriparatide treatment.

    Richard Prince;Adrien Sipos;Anwar Hossain;Unni Syversen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan M. Hodgson
Jonathan M. Hodgson Edith Cowan University
Scott G. Wilson
Scott G. Wilson University of Western Australia
Geoffrey C. Nicholson
Geoffrey C. Nicholson University of Queensland
Douglas P. Kiel
Douglas P. Kiel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Emma L. Duncan
Emma L. Duncan King's College London
Tim D. Spector
Tim D. Spector King's College London
John A. Eisman
John A. Eisman Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Matthew A. Brown
Matthew A. Brown Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Karol Estrada
Karol Estrada BioMarin (United States)
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Careers in medicine offer diverse pathways beyond the traditional MD route. Many students explore alternative healthcare degrees online to fast-track their entry into the field or to advance existing credentials. For those aiming to become nurses without a prior nursing background, direct entry msn programs online can provide a streamlined route to a master's degree in nursing.

If gaining admission to nursing school is a concern, researching the easiest rn program to get into can improve your chances of acceptance and help you launch your career sooner. Additionally, those interested in healthcare administration or behind-the-scenes roles may consider enrolling in accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid for flexible study options and support.

Not all nursing schools require standardized exams for admission. If you want to avoid extra testing, it is worth investigating whether do all nursing schools require the teas before applying. Exploring these alternative degrees and entry points can open many doors in the growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Prince

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles