World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8924
World Ranking
5706
National Ranking
269

Loes Keijsers publications per year

2005: 1 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 18 publications
2005 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

Loes Keijsers publication distribution in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Loes Keijsers sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Loes Keijsers D-index placement in Psychology in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Loes Keijsers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Loes Keijsers is a researcher affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their work primarily spans fields of psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, education, and applied psychology.

The research topics covered by Keijsers include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics

Keijsers has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • Child Development
  • Developmental Psychology

Recent notable papers include:

  • The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Social Media Use and Adolescents' Self-Esteem: Heading for a Person-Specific Media Effects Paradigm, 2021, Journal of Communication
  • Social Media Use and Adolescents' Well-Being: Developing a Typology of Person-Specific Effect Patterns, 2021, Communication Research
  • Social media use and friendship closeness in adolescents' daily lives: An experience sampling study, 2021, Developmental Psychology
  • Social Media Browsing and Adolescent Well-Being: Challenging the "Passive Social Media Use Hypothesis", 2021, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication

Collaborations form a significant part of Keijsers' research approach. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Ine Beyens
  • Patti M. Valkenburg
  • Anne Bülow
  • Savannah Boele
  • J. Loes Pouwels

The volume of publications and coauthorships indicates an established presence in the academic community focused on adolescent development, social media effects, and mental health interventions.

Best Publications

  • On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence.

    Wim Meeus;Rens Van De Schoot;Loes Keijsers;Seth J. Schwartz

  • The effect of social media on well-being differs from adolescent to adolescent

    Ine Beyens;J. Loes Pouwels;Irene I. van Driel;Loes Keijsers

  • Reciprocal Effects Between Parental Solicitation, Parental Control, Adolescent Disclosure, and Adolescent Delinquency

    Loes Keijsers;Susan J. T. Branje;Inge E. VanderValk;Wim Meeus

  • Developmental changes in parent–child communication throughout adolescence.

    Loes Keijsers;François Poulin

  • Anxiety trajectories and identity development in adolescence: a five-wave longitudinal study.

    Elisabetta Crocetti;Theo Klimstra;Loes Keijsers;William W. Hale

  • Developmental links of adolescent disclosure, parental solicitation, and control with delinquency: moderation by parental support.

    Loes Keijsers;Tom Frijns;Susan J. T. Branje;Wim Meeus

  • Parental monitoring and adolescent problem behaviors How much do we really know

    L.G.M.T. Keijsers;L.G.M.T. Keijsers

  • Examining the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) Among Early and Late Adolescents and Their Mothers

    S.T. Hawk;L. Keijsers;S.T.J. Branje;J. van der Graaff

  • Maintaining Close Relationships: Gratitude as a Motivator and a Detector of Maintenance Behavior

    Kaska E. Kubacka;Catrin Finkenauer;Caryl E. Rusbult;Loes Keijsers

  • Identity statuses as developmental trajectories: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescents.

    Wim H. J. Meeus;Rens van de Schoot;Loes Keijsers;Susan Branje

  • Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency.

    Loes Keijsers;Susan Branje;Skyler T. Hawk;Seth J. Schwartz

  • What parents don't know and how it may affect their children: qualifying the disclosure-adjustment link.

    Tom Frijns;Loes Keijsers;Susan Branje;Wim Meeus

  • Self-concept clarity across adolescence : Longitudinal associations with open communication with parents and internalizing symptoms

    Marloes P. A. Van Dijk;Susan Branje;Loes Keijsers;Skyler T. Hawk

  • Social media use and adolescents’ self-esteem: Heading for a person-specific media effects paradigm

    P. Valkenburg;I. Beyens;J.L. Pouwels;I.I. van Driel

  • Gender differences in keeping secrets from parents in adolescence

    Loes Keijsers;Susan J. T. Branje;Tom Frijns;Catrin Finkenauer

  • Mind your own business! Longitudinal relations between perceived privacy invasion and adolescent-parent conflict.

    Skyler T. Hawk;Loes Keijsers;William W. Hale Iii;Wim Meeus

  • A Review of Current Ambulatory Assessment Studies in Adolescent Samples and Practical Recommendations.

    Eeske van Roekel;Loes Keijsers;Joanne Mee Hae Chung

  • Discrete- vs. Continuous-Time Modeling of Unequally Spaced Experience Sampling Method Data.

    Silvia de Haan-Rietdijk;Manuel C. Voelkle;Loes Keijsers;Ellen L. Hamaker;Ellen L. Hamaker

  • Social media use and friendship closeness in adolescents' daily lives: An experience sampling study.

    J. Loes Pouwels;Patti M. Valkenburg;Ine Beyens;Irene I. van Driel

  • Come rain or come shine: Individual differences in how weather affects mood.

    Theo A. Klimstra;Tom Frijns;Loes Keijsers;Jaap J. A. Denissen

  • Moving in and out of Poverty: The Within-Individual Association between Socioeconomic Status and Juvenile Delinquency.

    Roderik Rekker;Dustin Pardini;L.G.M.T. Keijsers;S.T.J. Branje

  • The Longitudinal Association Between Self-esteem and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: Separating Between-Person Effects from Within-Person Effects

    M.W. Masselink;G.H. van Roekel;G.H. van Roekel;B.L. Hankin;L. Keijsers

Frequent Co-Authors

Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Susan Branje
Susan Branje Utrecht University
Patti M. Valkenburg
Patti M. Valkenburg University of Amsterdam
Hans M. Koot
Hans M. Koot Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Skyler T. Hawk
Skyler T. Hawk Chinese University of Hong Kong
William W. Hale
William W. Hale Utrecht University
Pol A. C. van Lier
Pol A. C. van Lier Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Theo A. Klimstra
Theo A. Klimstra Tufts University
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers
Quinten A. W. Raaijmakers Utrecht University
Jaap J. A. Denissen
Jaap J. A. Denissen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of fulfilling careers, particularly in the field of mental health counseling. It's important to understand the education and licensing requirements that can differ greatly depending on where you plan to practice.

For example, local requirements such as Norfolk mental health counselor education requirements may vary from what’s mandated in other cities. Similarly, those interested in working in Nevada should review the mental health counselor requirements in North Las Vegas.

California-based students should consider how to become a mental health counselor in Oakland to understand local guidelines and regulations. In Oklahoma, aspiring counselors can refer to the mental health counselor requirements in Oklahoma City for step-by-step guidance.

Exploring these different pathways is crucial for choosing the right online degree and preparing for a successful psychology career, tailored to your location and professional interests.

Best Scientists Citing Loes Keijsers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles