World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Rens van de Schoot

Rens van de Schoot

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6285 5845 292 280 175 17405

Rens van de Schoot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rens van de Schoot between 2008 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rens van de Schoot published across 19 years, from 2008 to 2026, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2020. 17 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2020. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
2008 2026

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rens van de Schoot: publications per year, 2008 to 2026
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 2
2010 7
2011 12
2012 27
2013 15
2014 16
2015 14
2016 10
2017 24
2018 10
2019 11
2020 33
2021 18
2022 7
2023 16
2024 16
2025 16
2026 1
Total 256
Download as CSV

Rens van de Schoot publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rens van de Schoot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 175 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 175
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rens van de Schoot D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rens van de Schoot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rens van de Schoot is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple subfields including Clinical Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems and Management, as well as Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The scientist's work covers topics such as:

  • Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Disaster Response and Management
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Rens van de Schoot include:

  • Jonathan De Bruin
  • Duco Veen
  • Gerbrich Ferdinands
  • Jelle Jasper Teijema
  • Sofie van den Brand

Publication venues where the scientist has commonly contributed include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • Systematic Reviews
  • European Journal of Psychotraumatology
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Recent notable papers by Rens van de Schoot include:

  • Bayesian statistics and modelling, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • Bayesian statistics and modelling, 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers

Other influential papers in their network, although authored by close collaborators, contribute to topics relevant to their research areas:

  • Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives, 2022, Social Science Research
  • Performance of active learning models for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: a simulation study into the Average Time to Discover relevant records, 2023, Systematic Reviews
  • The SAFE procedure: a practical stopping heuristic for active learning-based screening in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 2024, Systematic Reviews

The scientist's work emphasizes Bayesian approaches as well as active learning methodologies related to systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Their research broadly integrates computational methods with psychological and social science applications.

Best Publications

  • Multilevel Analysis : Techniques and Applications, Second Edition

    Joop J. Hox;Mirjam Moerbeek;Rens van de Schoot

  • A checklist for testing measurement invariance

    Rens Van de Schoot;Peter Lugtig;Joop Hox

  • A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research

    Rens van de Schoot;Rens van de Schoot;David Kaplan;Jaap J.A. Denissen;Jens B. Asendorpf

  • The GRoLTS-Checklist: Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies

    Rens van de Schoot;Marit Sijbrandij;Sonja D. Winter;Sarah Depaoli

  • On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence.

    Wim Meeus;Rens Van De Schoot;Loes Keijsers;Seth J. Schwartz

  • Improving transparency and replication in Bayesian statistics: The WAMBS-Checklist.

    Sarah Depaoli;Rens van de Schoot

  • A systematic review of Bayesian articles in psychology: The last 25 years.

    Rens van de Schoot;Sonja D. Winter;Oisín Ryan;Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg

  • Editorial: Measurement Invariance.

    Rens Van De Schoot;Rens Van De Schoot;Peter Schmidt;Peter Schmidt;Alain De Beuckelaer;Alain De Beuckelaer;Alain De Beuckelaer;Kimberley Lek

  • Analyzing small data sets using Bayesian estimation: the case of posttraumatic stress symptoms following mechanical ventilation in burn survivors

    Rens van de Schoot;Joris J. Broere;Koen H. Perryck;Mariëlle Zondervan-Zwijnenburg

  • How few countries will do? Comparative survey analysis from a Bayesian perspective

    Joop J.C.M. Hox;Rens van de Schoot;Suzette Matthijsse

  • Facing off with Scylla and Charybdis: a comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance.

    Rens van de Schoot;Rens van de Schoot;Anouck Kluytmans;Lars Tummers;Peter Lugtig

  • Bayesian Versus Frequentist Estimation for Structural Equation Models in Small Sample Contexts : A Systematic Review

    Sanne C. Smid;Daniel McNeish;Milica Miočević;Rens van de Schoot;Rens van de Schoot

  • Prolonged Grief Disorder, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder are distinguishable syndromes.

    Paul A. Boelen;Rens van de Schoot;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jos de Keijser

  • Reducing bias due to systematic attrition in longitudinal studies: The benefits of multiple imputation

    Jens B. Asendorpf;Rens van de Schoot;Rens van de Schoot;Jaap J. A. Denissen;Roos Hutteman

  • Identity statuses as developmental trajectories: a five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescents.

    Wim H. J. Meeus;Rens van de Schoot;Loes Keijsers;Susan Branje

  • Lifelong learning as a goal – Do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils?

    Marko Lüftenegger;Barbara Schober;Rens van de Schoot;Petra Wagner

  • The Stability of Problem Behavior Across the Preschool Years: An Empirical Approach in the General Population.

    Maartje Basten;Henning Tiemeier;Robert R. Althoff;Robert R. Althoff;Rens van de Schoot

  • Personality Types in Adolescence: Change and Stability and Links with Adjustment and Relationships--A Five-Wave Longitudinal Study.

    Wim Meeus;Rens Van de Schoot;Theo Klimstra;Susan Branje

  • Bayesian analyses : where to start and what to report

    Rens van de Schoot;Sarah Depaoli

  • An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews

    Rens van de Schoot;Jonathan de Bruin;Raoul Schram;Parisa Zahedi

Frequent Co-Authors

Joop J. Hox
Joop J. Hox Utrecht University
Herbert Hoijtink
Herbert Hoijtink Utrecht University
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University
Marit Sijbrandij
Marit Sijbrandij Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Dagmar Strohmeier
Dagmar Strohmeier University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
Iris M. Engelhard
Iris M. Engelhard Utrecht University
Rinie Geenen
Rinie Geenen Utrecht University
Susan Branje
Susan Branje Utrecht University
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Christiane Spiel
Christiane Spiel University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA often opens doors to a wide range of online degree options and career opportunities. For those seeking to enter the field quickly, consider enrolling in the shortest human services online program to gain foundational skills and start working sooner.

If you have a passion for sports and performance, pursuing further study in sports psychology can be rewarding. As a salary sports psychologist, you may work with athletes to improve mental performance while enjoying competitive compensation.

Graduates holding a master's degree have versatile career prospects. Learn more about what jobs can you get with a masters in psychology, including counseling, organizational consulting, and research roles.

For those fascinated by criminology or legal systems, a forensic psychology focus can be an excellent path. Discover what jobs can you get with a masters in forensic psychology, such as forensic analyst, court consultant, or victim advocate.

Best Scientists Citing Rens van de Schoot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles