World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 70 744 649 31 28 217 51277

Joop J. Hox publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joop J. Hox between 1984 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joop J. Hox published across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022, averaging 6.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2012. 3 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2012. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 14 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 19 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1984 2022

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joop J. Hox: publications per year, 1984 to 2022
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 2
1994 3
1995 14
1996 11
1997 12
1998 14
1999 7
2000 6
2001 3
2002 4
2003 9
2004 10
2005 10
2006 10
2007 9
2008 5
2009 7
2010 13
2011 9
2012 28
2013 8
2014 7
2015 6
2016 1
2017 19
2018 4
2019 4
2020 4
2021 2
2022 1
Total 249
Download as CSV

Joop J. Hox publications per year - data summary

  • Joop J. Hox, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Utrecht University, has 249 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1984 to 2022.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1984 and the most recent to 2022.
  • The most productive year is 2012, with 28 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1984, 1987, 1990, 2016 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1985, 1986, 1989 and 1992).
  • The rate of publication averages 6.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.1 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2018-2022) hold 15 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1984-1996: 37 publications (2.8 per year); 1997-2009: 106 publications (8.2 per year); 2010-2022: 106 publications (8.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Joop J. Hox publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop J. Hox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 217 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 217
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Joop J. Hox publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Joop J. Hox, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Utrecht University, records 217 publications - the 70th percentile of the discipline.
  • 70% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Joop J. Hox, and about 30% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Joop J. Hox ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Joop J. Hox D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joop J. Hox sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43 70
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Joop J. Hox D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Joop J. Hox, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Utrecht University, records 70 D-Index - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Joop J. Hox, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Joop J. Hox ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Joop J. Hox is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology. Their research spans multiple interconnected disciplines, including sociology and political science, clinical psychology, statistics and probability, and social psychology.

Hox's work addresses a variety of topics, prominently focusing on survey methodology and nonresponse, survey sampling and estimation techniques, focus groups and qualitative methods, migration, health and trauma, grief, bereavement, and mental health, as well as mental health via writing.

The list of recent papers by Joop J. Hox includes:

  • Survey Nonresponse Trends and Fieldwork Effort in the 21st Century: Results of an International Study across Countries and Surveys (2020), published in Journal of Official Statistics
  • Confirmatory Factor Analysis (2021), published in The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • Social network responses to victims of potentially traumatic events: A systematic review using qualitative evidence synthesis (2022), published in PLoS ONE
  • Single- and Mixed-Mode Survey Data Collection (2020), published in SAGE Research Methods Foundations

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Hox include Edith D. de Leeuw, Annemieke Luiten, Marieke C. Saan, Floryt van Wesel, and Sonja Leferink.

Hox's work has appeared in a variety of research venues such as:

  • Journal of Official Statistics
  • PLoS ONE
  • The Encyclopedia of Research Methods in Criminology and Criminal Justice
  • SAGE Research Methods Foundations

Best Publications

  • Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications

    Joop J. Hox

  • Sufficient Sample Sizes for Multilevel Modeling

    Cora J. M. Maas;Joop J. Hox

  • Multilevel Analysis : Techniques and Applications, Second Edition

    Joop J. Hox;Mirjam Moerbeek;Rens van de Schoot

  • A checklist for testing measurement invariance

    Rens Van de Schoot;Peter Lugtig;Joop Hox

  • An introduction to structural equation modeling

    J.J. Hox;T.M. Bechger

  • Applied multilevel analysis

    J.J. Hox

  • Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, 2nd ed.

    Joop J. Hox

  • Data collection, primary versus secondary

    J.J. Hox;H.R. Boeije

  • International handbook of survey methodology.

    Edith D. de Leeuw;Joop J. Hox;Don A. Dillman

  • Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis

    Cora J. M. Maas;Joop J. Hox

  • Theory of mind in schizophrenia: meta-analysis.

    Mirjam Sprong;Patricia Schothorst;Ellen Vos;Joop Hox

  • Present but sick: a three‐wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout

    Evangelia Demerouti;Pascale M. Le Blanc;Arnold B. Bakker;Wilmar B. Schaufeli

  • Updated Meta-Analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders

    Puck Duits;Danielle C. Cath;Shmuel Lissek;Joop J. Hox

  • Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality. 1

    Natacha Borgers;Edith de Leeuw;Joop Hox

  • Multilevel modeling: When and why

    J.J.C.M. Hox;J.J.C.M. Hox

  • The Accuracy of Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling With Pseudobalanced Groups and Small Samples

    Joop J. Hox;Cora J. M. Maas

  • The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors

    Cora J.M. Maas;Joop J. Hox

  • Meta-Analysis of Randomized Response Research Thirty-Five Years of Validation

    Gerty J. L. M. Lensvelt-Mulders;Joop J. Hox;Peter G. M. van der Heijden;Cora J. M. Maas

  • Do implementation intentions help to eat a healthy diet? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence

    Marieke A. Adriaanse;Charlotte D.W. Vinkers;Denise T.D. De Ridder;Joop J. Hox

  • Multilevel Analysis Methods

    Joop J. Hox;Ita G. G. Kreft

  • Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis

    Joop J. Hox;J. Kyle Roberts

Frequent Co-Authors

Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Don A. Dillman
Don A. Dillman Washington State University
Gideon J. Mellenbergh
Gideon J. Mellenbergh University of Amsterdam
Rinie Geenen
Rinie Geenen Utrecht University
Iris M. Engelhard
Iris M. Engelhard Utrecht University
Annet Kleiboer
Annet Kleiboer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets Tilburg University
Herbert Hoijtink
Herbert Hoijtink Utrecht University
Marcel A. van den Hout
Marcel A. van den Hout Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a variety of rewarding online degree options in the USA. Many students consider advanced programs like a psyd program to prepare for professional practice in psychology. Programs like these often focus on practical skills and clinical experience.

For those interested in family therapy, there are mft online degrees that offer fast-track, flexible learning options. This pathway can help you quickly enter the field and begin supporting families and couples.

Cost is a key concern for many students. If budget is a priority, you’ll find a range of affordable online psychology masters programs. These options offer quality education without excessive financial strain.

If educational leadership or higher-level teaching roles appeal to you, explore edd programs that can be completed online at an accelerated pace. This provides a convenient path to leadership positions in schools, universities, and policy organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Joop J. Hox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles