World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcel A. van den Hout

Marcel A. van den Hout

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 86 1154 1014 65 60 317 22406

Marcel A. van den Hout publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marcel A. van den Hout between 1982 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marcel A. van den Hout published across 42 years, from 1982 to 2023, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2010. 1 of the 327 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2010. 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1982 2023

327 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marcel A. van den Hout: publications per year, 1982 to 2023
Year Publications
1982 3
1983 2
1984 3
1985 2
1986 3
1987 8
1988 8
1989 8
1990 11
1991 4
1992 8
1993 10
1994 4
1995 6
1996 9
1997 7
1998 5
1999 4
2000 9
2001 11
2002 6
2003 13
2004 8
2005 6
2006 10
2007 15
2008 12
2009 7
2010 23
2011 13
2012 12
2013 13
2014 14
2015 7
2016 10
2017 12
2018 6
2019 8
2020 3
2021 3
2022 0
2023 1
Total 327
Download as CSV

Marcel A. van den Hout publications per year - data summary

  • Marcel A. van den Hout, a Psychology scholar from Utrecht University, has 327 publications recorded across 42 years, from 1982 to 2023.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2023.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2023, with 1 publication.
  • 1 of the 42 years in the span carries no publications at all (2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.0 per year counting only the 41 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2019-2023) hold 15 publications, 5% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1995: 80 publications (5.7 per year); 1996-2009: 122 publications (8.7 per year); 2010-2023: 125 publications (8.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Marcel A. van den Hout publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel A. van den Hout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 311–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 317 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100 317
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marcel A. van den Hout publication distribution in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 69 ranges running from 31–40 to 705+ publications.
  • Marcel A. van den Hout, a Psychology scholar from Utrecht University, records 317 publications - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marcel A. van den Hout, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 151–160 publications range, and Marcel A. van den Hout ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 101–110 publications, holding 736 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 72% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 705 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Marcel A. van den Hout D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel A. van den Hout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101 86
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Marcel A. van den Hout D-index placement in Psychology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 11,416 Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 58 ranges running from 30–31 to 144+ D-Index.
  • Marcel A. van den Hout, a Psychology scholar from Utrecht University, records 86 D-Index - the 90th percentile of the discipline.
  • 90% of ranked Psychology scientists score the same or lower than Marcel A. van den Hout, and about 10% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 48–49 D-Index range, and Marcel A. van den Hout ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32–33 D-Index, holding 702 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 68% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 58–59 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Marcel A. van den Hout is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research profile is based on their academic association, indicating an engagement in scholarly activities within this institution.

While specific details regarding recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are not provided, Marcel A. van den Hout's academic presence at Utrecht University suggests involvement in ongoing research and teaching duties common to such roles.

No information about awards, fields of study, subfields, or main research topics is available, which limits a detailed description of research focus. Similarly, data about book publications or research impact metrics like citation counts are not accessible.

The absence of publicly listed recent papers or collaborations means that a comprehensive evaluation of Marcel A. van den Hout's contributions to scientific literature cannot be formulated at this time. However, affiliation with a recognized university indicates sustained academic engagement.

As of the current record, Marcel A. van den Hout is not deceased, and the academic career continues in a contemporary context.

Best Publications

  • Pain catastrophizing predicts pain intensity, disability, and psychological distress independent of the level of physical impairment

    Rudy Severeijns;Johan W. S. Vlaeyen;Marcel A. Van Den Hout;Wim E. J. Weber

  • Updated Meta-Analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders

    Puck Duits;Danielle C. Cath;Shmuel Lissek;Joop J. Hox

  • A Cognitive-Behavioral Conceptualization of Complicated Grief.

    Paul A. Boelen;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jan van den Bout

  • Treatment of complicated grief: a comparison between cognitive-behavioral therapy and supportive counseling

    Paul A. Boelen;Jos de Keijser;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jan van den Bout

  • Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements

    Marcel van den Hout;Peter Muris;Elske Salemink;Merel Kindt

  • Repeated checking causes memory distrust.

    Marcel van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • Selective attention and threat: quick orienting versus slow disengagement and two versions of the dot probe task.

    Elske Salemink;Marcel A. van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • “If I feel anxious, there must be danger”: Ex-consequentia reasoning in inferring danger in anxiety disorders

    Arnoud Arntz;Michael Rauner;Marcel Van den Hout

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder after pregnancy loss

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Arnoud Arntz

  • Correlations among Salivary Testosterone, Mood, and Selective Attention to Threat in Humans

    Jack van Honk;Adriaan Tuiten;Rien Verbaten;Marcel van den Hout

  • Attentional bias and spider phobia : conceptual and clinical issues

    Edith H. Lavy;Marcel Van den Hout;Arnoud Arntz

  • Thought suppression induces intrusions.

    Edith H. Lavy;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • CO2 vulnerability in panic disorder.

    Eric J.L. Griez;Harold Lousberg;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • Selective processing of emotional information in obsessive compulsive disorder.

    Edith H. Lavy;Patricia van Oppen;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • Prolonged Grief Disorder, depression, and posttraumatic stress disorder are distinguishable syndromes.

    Paul A. Boelen;Rens van de Schoot;Marcel A. van den Hout;Jos de Keijser

  • How does EMDR work

    Marcel A. van den Hout;Iris M. Engelhard

  • Deployment-related stress and trauma in Dutch soldiers returning from Iraq. Prospective study.

    Iris M Engelhard;Marcel A van den Hout;Jos Weerts;Arnoud Arntz

  • Pre-trauma individual differences in extinction learning predict posttraumatic stress

    Miriam J.J. Lommen;Iris M. Engelhard;Marit Sijbrandij;Marit Sijbrandij;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • The etiology of specific phobias: A review

    Harald Merckelbach;Peter J. de Jong;Peter Muris;Marcel A. van Den Hout

  • Negative cognitions and avoidance in emotional problems after bereavement: a prospective study.

    Paul A. Boelen;Jan van den Bout;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • EMDR: eye movements superior to beeps in taxing working memory and reducing vividness of recollections.

    Marcel A. van den Hout;Iris M. Engelhard;Marleen M. Rijkeboer;Jutte Koekebakker

Frequent Co-Authors

Iris M. Engelhard
Iris M. Engelhard Utrecht University
Harald Merckelbach
Harald Merckelbach Maastricht University
Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Anita Jansen
Anita Jansen Maastricht University
Paul A. Boelen
Paul A. Boelen Utrecht University
Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University
Elske Salemink
Elske Salemink Utrecht University
Monique A. M. Smeets
Monique A. M. Smeets Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, especially in specialized fields like behavior analysis. Many students consider becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a credential that requires advanced education and practical experience. However, the specific educational and professional requirements can vary significantly by location.

For example, those interested in working in Colorado should review the Denver bcba requirements to understand the necessary steps, including accredited coursework and supervised fieldwork. Similarly, individuals looking into becoming a bcba in Detroit must be aware of local licensure expectations and practicum standards.

Other cities have their unique processes as well. If you are considering becoming a bcba in Durham, or want to know the El Paso bcba education requirements, it's important to research each region’s qualifications before enrolling in an online psychology program. Understanding these pathways will help you choose the right degree—and guide your professional journey—in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel A. van den Hout

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles