World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Danielle C. Cath

Danielle C. Cath

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
21959
World Ranking
2448
National Ranking
133

Danielle C. Cath publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle C. Cath sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 251 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Danielle C. Cath D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle C. Cath sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danielle C. Cath is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their scholarly output spans a range of topics predominantly within psychology and medicine, with a specific focus on clinical psychology and psychiatry.

The scientist's recent publications include:

  • High persistence and low treatment rates of metabolic syndrome in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: A naturalistic follow-up study, 2024, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • 61. GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY OF OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE SYMPTOMS AND HOARDING SYMPTOMS IN THE GENERAL POPULATION, 2021, European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • 'Patienten hebben net zoveel last van de psychiatrische klachten als van de motorische problemen', 2021, Psychiater (Amsterdam. Online)/˜De œpsychiater
  • Behandeling door een intelligente avatartherapeut, 2022, Psychiater (Amsterdam. Online)/˜De œpsychiater
  • The best of both worlds?, 2022, Psychiater (Amsterdam. Online)/˜De œpsychiater

The scientist frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Bennard Doornbos
  • Boris van Passel
  • Unna N. Danner
  • Eni S. Becker
  • Gert-Jan Hendriks

Publication venues where Danielle C. Cath's work commonly appears include:

  • Psychiater (Amsterdam. Online)/˜De œpsychiater
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Psychiatry Research

Their research contributions cover major topics such as:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health

Danielle C. Cath works mainly within the fields of:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

This includes subfields such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Best Publications

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Genomic Relationships, Novel Loci, and Pleiotropic Mechanisms across Eight Psychiatric Disorders

    Phil H. Lee;Verneri Anttila;Hyejung Won;Yen-Chen A. Feng

  • Lifetime Prevalence, Age of Risk, and Genetic Relationships of Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Tourette Syndrome

    Matthew E. Hirschtritt;Paul C. Lee;David L. Pauls;Yves Dion

  • Updated Meta-Analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders

    Puck Duits;Danielle C. Cath;Shmuel Lissek;Joop J. Hox

  • Factor Structure, Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): A Study in Dutch Population and Patient Groups

    Rosa A. Hoekstra;Meike Bartels;Danielle C. Cath;Dorret I. Boomsma

  • Revealing the complex genetic architecture of obsessive-compulsive disorder using meta-analysis

    Paul D. Arnold;Kathleen D. Askland;Cristina Barlassina;Laura Bellodi

  • Frontal-striatal dysfunction during planning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Dick J. Veltman;Henk J. Groenewegen;Danielle C. Cath

  • Disorder-specific neuroanatomical correlates of attentional bias in obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and hypochondriasis.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Dick J. Veltman;Henk J. Groenewegen;Menno P. Witter

  • Reduced orbitofrontal-striatal activity on a reversal learning task in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Peter L. Remijnse;Marjan M. A. Nielen;Anton J. L. M. van Balkom;Daniëlle C. Cath

  • Twin studies on obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review

    Daniël S. van Grootheest;Daniëlle C. Cath;Aartjan T. Beekman;Dorret I. Boomsma

  • The co-morbidity of anxiety and depression in the perspective of genetic epidemiology. A review of twin and family studies.

    C. M. Middeldorp;D. C. Cath;R. Van Dyck;D. I. Boomsma

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Interrogating the Genetic Determinants of Tourette’s Syndrome and Other Tic Disorders Through Genome-Wide Association Studies

    Dongmei Yu;Jae Hoon Sul;Fotis Tsetsos;Muhammad S Nawaz

  • Exposure with response prevention versus habit reversal in Tourettes's syndrome: a controlled study.

    Cara W.J Verdellen;Ger P.J Keijsers;Danielle C Cath;Cees A.L Hoogduin

  • Presupplementary motor area hyperactivity during response inhibition: a candidate endophenotype of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Stella J. de Wit;Froukje E. de Vries;Ysbrand D. van der Werf;Danielle C. Cath

  • Partitioning the heritability of tourette syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder reveals differences in genetic architecture

    Lea K. Davis;Dongmei Yu;Clare L. Keenan;Eric R. Gamazon

  • Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Stella J. De Wit;Pino Alonso;Lizanne Schweren;David Mataix-Cols

  • European clinical guidelines for Tourette Syndrome and other tic disorders. Part I: assessment

    Danielle C. Cath;Tammy Hedderly;Andrea G. Ludolph;Jeremy S. Stern

  • Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome.

    Linda Ackermans;Annelien Duits;Chris van der Linden;Marina A. Tijssen

  • Twin Studies on Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Review

    Unknown

  • Genome wide meta-analysis identifies genomic relationships, novel loci, and pleiotropic mechanisms across eight psychiatric disorders

    Lee Ph;Anttila;Won H

Frequent Co-Authors

Dorret I. Boomsma
Dorret I. Boomsma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom
Anton J. L. M. van Balkom University of Amsterdam
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Dan J. Stein
Dan J. Stein University of Cape Town
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam
Benjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale Harvard University
David L. Pauls
David L. Pauls Harvard University
Ysbrand D. van der Werf
Ysbrand D. van der Werf Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gholson J. Lyon
Gholson J. Lyon Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Marina A.J. Tijssen
Marina A.J. Tijssen University Medical Center Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities, especially within social work and related fields. Many students consider entering social work due to its strong connection to psychology and its focus on helping individuals and communities thrive.

It's important to note that each state sets specific educational and licensing requirements for social workers. For example, Arkansas education requirements for social workers emphasize completing a state-accredited social work degree program. In contrast, the degree needed to be a social worker in California often includes a Master’s in Social Work (MSW) and passing state exams.

Other states like Colorado stipulate unique social worker degree requirements in Colorado, which may include supervised fieldwork and specific coursework. Similarly, those interested in practicing in Connecticut must follow social worker degree requirements in Connecticut.

Whether you pursue an online psychology degree or a specialized social work pathway, understanding these requirements is essential for a successful career in this rewarding field.

Best Scientists Citing Danielle C. Cath

Trending Scientists