World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 55 3559 3358 1543 1446 257 14428

Gholson J. Lyon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gholson J. Lyon between 1998 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gholson J. Lyon published across 29 years, from 1998 to 2026, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2013. 20 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2013. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 7 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 49 publications 2014: 42 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 19 publications 2026: 1 publication
1998 2026

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gholson J. Lyon: publications per year, 1998 to 2026
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 4
2000 2
2001 0
2002 3
2003 3
2004 3
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 7
2009 2
2010 3
2011 11
2012 26
2013 49
2014 42
2015 36
2016 11
2017 10
2018 9
2019 8
2020 8
2021 10
2022 7
2023 15
2024 16
2025 19
2026 1
Total 308
Download as CSV

Gholson J. Lyon publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gholson J. Lyon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 255–264 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 257 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92 257
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Gholson J. Lyon D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gholson J. Lyon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145 55
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Mutation

Gholson J. Lyon mainly focuses on Genetics, Exome sequencing, Exome, DNA sequencing and Genomics. Genetics and Enzyme are commonly linked in his work. Gholson J. Lyon combines subjects such as Acetyltransferase, Ogden Syndrome, Hypotonia, X chromosome and Exon with his study of Exome sequencing.

His Exome research incorporates elements of Genome, Whole genome sequencing, Sequence alignment and Indel. His DNA sequencing research incorporates themes from Data mining, Deep sequencing and Word error rate. His Genomics research includes themes of Ontology, Precision medicine, Translational research and Phenotype.

His most cited work include:

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain (726 citations)
  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017 (471 citations)
  • Fatal infantile cardioencephalomyopathy with COX deficiency and mutations in SCO2 , a COX assembly gene (465 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Computational biology, Exome sequencing, Genome and Whole genome sequencing. All of his Genetics and DNA sequencing, Copy-number variation, Human genetics, Genomics and Personal genomics investigations are sub-components of the entire Genetics study. His Copy-number variation research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Genome-wide association study and Tourette syndrome.

His study in Exome sequencing is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hypotonia, Human Phenotype Ontology and Indel. The Genome study combines topics in areas such as Genotyping and Bioinformatics. His research investigates the link between Whole genome sequencing and topics such as Exome that cross with problems in Human genome.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Genetics (62.63%)
  • Computational biology (21.45%)
  • Exome sequencing (27.34%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Genetics (62.63%)
  • Exome sequencing (27.34%)
  • Tourette syndrome (9.34%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Gholson J. Lyon spends much of his time researching Genetics, Exome sequencing, Tourette syndrome, Phenotype and Human Phenotype Ontology. His study in Copy-number variation, Genomics, Intellectual disability, Human genetics and NAA15 falls within the category of Genetics. His Genomics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Translational research, Human genome, Computational biology and Candidate gene.

The concepts of his Candidate gene study are interwoven with issues in Indel, Annotation, Molecular Sequence Annotation, INDEL Mutation and DNA sequencing. His work deals with themes such as Missense mutation, Contig, Allele and Bioinformatics, which intersect with Exome sequencing. Gholson J. Lyon has included themes like Clinical psychology, Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Tics and Genetic architecture in his Tourette syndrome study.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain (726 citations)
  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017 (471 citations)
  • Long-read sequencing and de novo assembly of a Chinese genome (176 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Mutation

Gholson J. Lyon mainly investigates Genetics, Tourette syndrome, Computational biology, Genome-wide association study and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. His work in Exome sequencing, Missense mutation, Shotgun sequencing, Reference genome and Sequence assembly is related to Genetics. His research in Exome sequencing is mostly concerned with Cancer genome sequencing.

His work carried out in the field of Tourette syndrome brings together such families of science as Tics, Proband and Copy-number variation. His studies deal with areas such as Indel, Human genome, Sequencing data and Genomics as well as Computational biology. Gholson J. Lyon interconnects Annotation, INDEL Mutation, DNA sequencing and Candidate gene in the investigation of issues within Genomics.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2017

    Sebastian Köhler;Nicole A. Vasilevsky;Mark Engelstad;Erin D. Foster

  • Lifetime Prevalence, Age of Risk, and Genetic Relationships of Comorbid Psychiatric Disorders in Tourette Syndrome

    Matthew E. Hirschtritt;Paul C. Lee;David L. Pauls;Yves Dion

  • Fatal infantile cardioencephalomyopathy with COX deficiency and mutations in SCO2, a COX assembly gene

    L C Papadopoulou;C M Sue;M M Davidson;K Tanji

  • Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing

    Jason O'Rawe;Jason O'Rawe;Tao Jiang;Guangqing Sun;Yiyang Wu;Yiyang Wu

  • Peptide signaling in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria.

    Gholson J. Lyon;Richard P. Novick

  • Genome-wide copy number variation study associates metabotropic glutamate receptor gene networks with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

    Josephine Elia;Joseph T. Glessner;Kai Wang;Nagahide Takahashi

  • An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge.

    Catherine A. Brownstein;Alan H. Beggs;Nils Homer;Barry Merriman

  • Interrogating the Genetic Determinants of Tourette’s Syndrome and Other Tic Disorders Through Genome-Wide Association Studies

    Dongmei Yu;Jae Hoon Sul;Fotis Tsetsos;Muhammad S Nawaz

  • Rational design of a global inhibitor of the virulence response in Staphylococcus aureus, based in part on localization of the site of inhibition to the receptor-histidine kinase, AgrC

    Gholson J. Lyon;Patricia Mayville;Tom W. Muir;Richard P. Novick

  • Exfoliatin-producing strains define a fourth agr specificity group in Staphylococcus aureus.

    S. Jarraud;G. J. Lyon;G. J. Lyon;A. M. S. Figueiredo;G. Lina

  • SNVer: a statistical tool for variant calling in analysis of pooled or individual next-generation sequencing data

    Zhi-Jian Wei;Wei-wei Wang;Pingzhao Hu;Gholson J Lyon

  • Long-read sequencing and de novo assembly of a Chinese genome

    Lingling Shi;Lingling Shi;Yunfei Guo;Chengliang Dong;John Huddleston

  • Using VAAST to Identify an X-Linked Disorder Resulting in Lethality in Male Infants Due to N-Terminal Acetyltransferase Deficiency

    Alan F. Rope;Kai Wang;Rune Evjenth;Jinchuan Xing

  • Mice deficient for the secreted glycoprotein SPARC/osteonectin/BM40 develop normally but show severe age-onset cataract formation and disruption of the lens.

    Darren T. Gilmour;Gholson J. Lyon;Mark B.L. Carlton;Joshua R. Sanes

  • Key determinants of receptor activation in the agr autoinducing peptides of Staphylococcus aureus.

    Gholson J. Lyon;Jesse S. Wright;Tom W. Muir;Richard P. Novick

  • Accurate de novo and transmitted indel detection in exome-capture data using microassembly

    Giuseppe Narzisi;Jason A O'Rawe;Ivan Iossifov;Han Fang

  • Genome-wide association study of Tourette's syndrome

    J. M. Scharf;J. M. Scharf;D. Yu;C. A. Mathews;B. M. Neale;B. M. Neale

  • Reducing INDEL calling errors in whole genome and exome sequencing data

    Han Fang;Yiyang Wu;Giuseppe Narzisi;Jason A ORawe;Jason A ORawe

  • Chemical Signaling among Bacteria and Its Inhibition

    Gholson J Lyon;Tom W Muir

Frequent Co-Authors

Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University
Robert A. King
Robert A. King Yale University
Hakon Hakonarson
Hakon Hakonarson Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Benjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale Harvard University
William M. McMahon
William M. McMahon University of Utah
David L. Pauls
David L. Pauls Harvard University
Nelson B. Freimer
Nelson B. Freimer University of California, Los Angeles
Cathy L. Barr
Cathy L. Barr University Health Network
Mary M. Robertson
Mary M. Robertson University College London
Guy A. Rouleau
Guy A. Rouleau Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Genetics is a rapidly evolving field, but it also shares many intersections with other healthcare and science careers. If you are interested in alternative or complementary pathways, there are several accessible options available. For example, prospective nurses can explore nursing schools that do not require entrance exam scores, streamlining the admissions process for those eager to enter the nursing profession.

For those considering leadership roles in healthcare, numerous affordable mha online programs offer a cost-effective way to advance your credentials and impact health organizations from an administrative perspective. Meanwhile, those looking to accelerate their entry into the healthcare field might be interested in fast, intensive options like the 10 month lpn program, which provides a quick pathway to a rewarding career as a licensed practical nurse.

For professionals aiming for advanced expertise and research opportunities, earning an online phd nursing can open doors to academic, clinical, and policy impact roles. Each of these degrees complements a background in genetics and broadens your potential career pathways in the health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Gholson J. Lyon

Trending Scientists