World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
María del Pino Alonso Ortega

María del Pino Alonso Ortega

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 5000 4638 55 54 172 10425

María del Pino Alonso Ortega publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by María del Pino Alonso Ortega between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. María del Pino Alonso Ortega published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2014. 11 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2014. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 5 publications
2001 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
María del Pino Alonso Ortega: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 5
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 11
2009 7
2010 7
2011 10
2012 8
2013 11
2014 16
2015 10
2016 12
2017 8
2018 7
2019 11
2020 9
2021 9
2022 9
2023 5
2024 6
2025 5
Total 180
Download as CSV

María del Pino Alonso Ortega publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María del Pino Alonso Ortega sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 172
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

María del Pino Alonso Ortega D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María del Pino Alonso Ortega sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

María del Pino Alonso Ortega is affiliated with Bellvitge University Hospital in Spain and has made significant contributions in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work primarily focuses on obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and autism spectrum disorder research, with additional interest in anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Their main research fields include:

  • Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, they specialize in the following subfields:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Neurology

The primary topics of their research cover:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

María del Pino Alonso Ortega collaborates with several frequent co-authors including José M. Menchón, Sara Bertolín, Eva Real, Cinto Segalàs, and Carles Soriano-Mas, indicating active engagement with a research network focused on psychology and psychiatry.

Their publications appear predominantly in a set of recurring scholarly venues:

  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Psychiatry

Recent papers authored or co-authored by María del Pino Alonso Ortega include:

  • "Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups," 2020, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • "Structural neuroimaging biomarkers for obsessive-compulsive disorder in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium: medication matters," 2020, Translational Psychiatry
  • "How is COVID-19 affecting patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder? A longitudinal study on the initial phase of the pandemic in a Spanish cohort," 2021, European Psychiatry
  • "The thalamus and its subnuclei-a gateway to obsessive-compulsive disorder," 2022, Translational Psychiatry
  • "Changes in the stool and oropharyngeal microbiome in obsessive-compulsive disorder," 2022, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Altered Corticostriatal Functional Connectivity in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    B J Harrison;Carles Soriano-Mas;Jesus M Pujol;Hector Ortiz

  • Mapping structural brain alterations in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Jesús Pujol;Carles Soriano-Mas;Pino Alonso;Narcís Cardoner

  • Compulsive Hoarding: OCD Symptom, Distinct Clinical Syndrome, or Both?

    Alberto Pertusa;Miguel A Fullana;Satwant Singh;Pino Alonso

  • Deep Brain Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis of Treatment Outcome and Predictors of Response

    Pino Alonso;Daniel Cuadras;Loes Gabriëls;Damiaan Denys

  • Long-term follow-up and predictors of clinical outcome in obsessive-compulsive patients treated with serotonin reuptake inhibitors and behavioral therapy.

    Pino Alonso;Jose M. Menchon;Josep Pifarre;David Mataix-Cols

  • Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Stella J. De Wit;Pino Alonso;Lizanne Schweren;David Mataix-Cols

  • Right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    Pino Alonso;Jesús Pujol;Narcís Cardoner;Luisa Benlloch

  • Brain circuitry of compulsivity.

    Odile A. van den Heuvel;Odile A. van den Heuvel;Odile A. van den Heuvel;Guido van Wingen;Carles Soriano-Mas;Carles Soriano-Mas;Pino Alonso;Pino Alonso

  • Female reproductive cycle and obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Javier Labad;José Manuel Menchón;Pino Alonso;Cinto Segalàs

  • Cortical Abnormalities Associated With Pediatric and Adult Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Brain Corticostriatal Systems and the Major Clinical Symptom Dimensions of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Ben J. Harrison;Jesus Pujol;Narcis Cardoner;Joan Deus

  • Gender differences in obsessive–compulsive symptom dimensions

    Javier Labad;Jose Manuel Menchon;Pino Alonso;Cinto Segalas

  • Part 1—You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents

    Adam S. Radomsky;Gillian M. Alcolado;Jonathan Stuart Abramowitz;Pino Alonso

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • Perceived parental rearing style in obsessive-compulsive disorder: relation to symptom dimensions

    Pino Alonso;José M. Menchón;David Mataix-Cols;Josep Pifarré

  • Neuropsychological performance in medicated vs. unmedicated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    David Mataix-Cols;Pino Alonso;Josep Pifarré;Josep Manuel Menchón

  • Suicide in patients treated for obsessive–compulsive disorder: A prospective follow-up study.

    P. Alonso;P. Alonso;P. Alonso;C. Segalàs;E. Real;A. Pertusa

  • Clinical implications of insight assessment in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Pino Alonso;José M. Menchón;Cinto Segalàs;Nuria Jaurrieta

  • Cortical thickness in obsessive–compulsive disorder: multisite mega-analysis of 780 brain scans from six centres

    Jean Paul Fouche;Stefan Du Plessis;Coenie Hattingh;Annerine Roos

  • Amygdala activation and symptom dimensions in obsessive compulsive disorder

    Esther Via;Narcís Cardoner;Jesús Pujol;Pino Alonso

Frequent Co-Authors

José M. Menchón
José M. Menchón University of Barcelona
Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona
Cinto Segalàs
Cinto Segalàs Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Eva Real
Eva Real Bellvitge University Hospital
Narcís Cardoner
Narcís Cardoner Autonomous University of Barcelona
Susana Jiménez-Murcia
Susana Jiménez-Murcia University of Barcelona
Jesús Pujol
Jesús Pujol Instituto de Salud Carlos III
David Mataix-Cols
David Mataix-Cols Karolinska Institute
Ben J. Harrison
Ben J. Harrison University of Melbourne
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Psychology, exploring related online degrees can broaden career options and skill sets. Many choose to pursue advanced study in fields such as social work, mental health counseling, or behavioral analysis, all of which complement a foundation in psychology.

Social work is a popular pathway, offering diverse opportunities in counseling, healthcare, community services, and more. If you are looking for top programs, several resources highlight the best online social work programs in the Northeast, with flexible options for working professionals. Alternatively, students based in New Hampshire can find specialized offerings by reviewing the best online social work degree programs in New Hampshire. Those considering Ohio can research the top online social work programs in Ohio to compare curriculum and outcomes. Texas residents or anyone interested in remote programs offered from the state can review the best online social work degrees in Texas.

Whether you’re seeking licensing, specialized practice, or career advancement, these online degrees provide a flexible and accessible route to meaningful roles within and beyond psychology.

Best Scientists Citing María del Pino Alonso Ortega

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles