World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4952 4592 54 53 236 12046

Narcís Cardoner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Narcís Cardoner between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Narcís Cardoner published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2019. 45 of the 308 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2019. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 23 publications
1999 2025

308 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Narcís Cardoner: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 3
2003 3
2004 4
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 9
2010 5
2011 8
2012 13
2013 18
2014 17
2015 12
2016 16
2017 26
2018 8
2019 31
2020 16
2021 31
2022 18
2023 14
2024 22
2025 23
Total 308
Download as CSV

Narcís Cardoner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Narcís Cardoner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 236 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 236
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Narcís Cardoner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Narcís Cardoner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Narcís Cardoner is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research spans multiple intersecting domains in medical and psychological sciences, with a focus on psychiatric and neuroscience studies.

They have contributed extensively to fields such as Medicine, Psychology, and Neuroscience. Within these domains, their work includes significant publications in the subfields of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's research topics emphasize Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Treatment of Major Depression, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes. Additional topics include Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Bipolar Disorder and Treatment, as well as Schizophrenia research and treatment.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • European Psychiatry
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health

Recent notable papers by Narcís Cardoner include:

  • "Regional, circuit and network heterogeneity of brain abnormalities in psychiatric disorders," 2023, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Structural brain correlates in major depression, anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder: A voxel-based morphometry meta-analysis," 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • "Representation and Outcomes of Individuals With Schizophrenia Seen in Everyday Practice Who Are Ineligible for Randomized Clinical Trials," 2022, JAMA Psychiatry
  • "Mega-analysis methods in ENIGMA: The experience of the generalized anxiety disorder working group," 2020, Human Brain Mapping
  • "Cortical and subcortical brain structure in generalized anxiety disorder: findings from 28 research sites in the ENIGMA-Anxiety Working Group," 2021, Translational Psychiatry

They have collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Carles Soriano-Mas
  • Marta Cano
  • Daniel Porta-Casteràs
  • Maria Serra-Blasco
  • Muriel Vicent-Gil

Best Publications

  • A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps

    Joaquim Radua;David Mataix-Cols;M. L. Phillips;M. L. Phillips;W. El-Hage

  • Neural signatures of human fear conditioning: an updated and extended meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

    M. A Fullana;B. J Harrison;C Soriano-Mas;C Soriano-Mas;Bram Vervliet

  • Altered Corticostriatal Functional Connectivity in Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

    B J Harrison;Carles Soriano-Mas;Jesus M Pujol;Hector Ortiz

  • Common and distinct patterns of grey-matter volume alteration in major depression and bipolar disorder: evidence from voxel-based meta-analysis

    T Wise;J Radua;J Radua;E Via;N Cardoner

  • Mapping structural brain alterations in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Jesús Pujol;Carles Soriano-Mas;Pino Alonso;Narcís Cardoner

  • Consistency and functional specialization in the default mode brain network

    Ben J. Harrison;Jesus Pujol;Marina López-Solà;Rosa Hernández-Ribas

  • Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Stella J. De Wit;Pino Alonso;Lizanne Schweren;David Mataix-Cols

  • Right prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    Pino Alonso;Jesús Pujol;Narcís Cardoner;Luisa Benlloch

  • Fear extinction in the human brain: A meta-analysis of fMRI studies in healthy participants.

    Miquel A. Fullana;Anton Albajes-Eizagirre;Carles Soriano-Mas;Bram Vervliet

  • Brain Corticostriatal Systems and the Major Clinical Symptom Dimensions of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Ben J. Harrison;Jesus Pujol;Narcis Cardoner;Joan Deus

  • Meta-analysis of Gray Matter Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorder Should Asperger Disorder Be Subsumed Under a Broader Umbrella of Autistic Spectrum Disorder?

    Esther Via;Joaquim Radua;Narcis Cardoner;Francesca Happé

  • Dynamic functional connectivity reveals altered variability in functional connectivity among patients with major depressive disorder

    Murat Demirtaş;Cristian Tornador;Carles Falcón;Marina López‐Solà

  • Anatomical variability of the anterior cingulate gyrus and basic dimensions of human personality.

    Jesús Pujol;Anna López;Joan Deus;Narcı́s Cardoner

  • Mapping Brain Response to Pain in Fibromyalgia Patients Using Temporal Analysis of fMRI

    Jesus Pujol;Marina López-Solà;Héctor Ortiz;Joan Carles Vilanova

  • Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Assessment of Structural Brain Alterations in Melancholic Depression

    Carles Soriano-Mas;Rosa Hernández-Ribas;Jesús Pujol;Mikel Urretavizcaya

  • Breakdown in the brain network subserving moral judgment in criminal psychopathy

    Jesus Pujol;Iolanda Batalla;Oren Contreras-Rodríguez;Ben J. Harrison

  • Alexithymia correlates with the size of the right anterior cingulate.

    Harald Gündel;Anna López-Sala;Andres O. Ceballos-Baumann;Joan Deus

  • Auditory event-related potentials in 50 melancholic patients: increased N100, N200 and P300 latencies and diminished P300 amplitude

    M Urretavizcaya;I Moreno;L Benlloch;N Cardoner

  • The Lateral Asymmetry of the Human Brain Studied by Volumetric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Jesús Pujol;Anna López-Sala;Joan Deus;Narcís Cardoner

  • Clinical implications of insight assessment in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Pino Alonso;José M. Menchón;Cinto Segalàs;Nuria Jaurrieta

Frequent Co-Authors

Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona
José M. Menchón
José M. Menchón University of Barcelona
Jesús Pujol
Jesús Pujol Instituto de Salud Carlos III
María del Pino Alonso Ortega
María del Pino Alonso Ortega Bellvitge University Hospital
Ben J. Harrison
Ben J. Harrison University of Melbourne
Cinto Segalàs
Cinto Segalàs Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Eva Real
Eva Real Bellvitge University Hospital
Joan Deus
Joan Deus Autonomous University of Barcelona
Miquel A. Fullana
Miquel A. Fullana Clínic Barcelona
Joaquim Radua
Joaquim Radua University of Barcelona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of diverse online degrees and career pathways. Many students are drawn to roles such as counseling, which require a mix of education, experience, and state-specific licensing.

If you're considering a counseling career, it's important to know that requirements can differ by state. Interested in heading down this path quickly in the Midwest? Check out the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Indiana or learn about the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Iowa. Each state’s process may involve specific coursework, supervised experience, and exam requirements.

Other states have their own timelines and steps. For example, discover the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Kansas or look into the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Kentucky. Many online psychology programs offer flexible study schedules, letting you move towards licensure at your own pace.

Whether you plan to work in a clinical, school, or community setting, understanding these varied pathways can help you make more informed decisions about your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Narcís Cardoner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles