World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Iris M. Engelhard

Iris M. Engelhard

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4567 4227 219 210 227 12049

Iris M. Engelhard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Iris M. Engelhard between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Iris M. Engelhard published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2017. 23 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2017. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications
1999 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Iris M. Engelhard: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 3
2003 5
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 5
2008 3
2009 6
2010 8
2011 13
2012 11
2013 17
2014 12
2015 14
2016 19
2017 24
2018 12
2019 16
2020 15
2021 15
2022 12
2023 10
2024 12
2025 11
Total 258
Download as CSV

Iris M. Engelhard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris M. Engelhard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 227
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Iris M. Engelhard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Iris M. Engelhard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Iris M. Engelhard is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a notable focus on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology as well as Clinical Psychology. The scientist's work also encompasses Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, and Applied Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their publications include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment methodologies, and cognitive processes. Additionally, they explore stress responses and cortisol, memory and neural mechanisms, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health research topics, behavioral health and interventions, and the psychology of moral and emotional judgment.

The scientist has published extensively in several key journals. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • Biological Psychology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Iris M. Engelhard include:

  • Gaëtan Mertens
  • Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos
  • Eva A.M. van Dis
  • Lotte Gerritsen
  • Elske Salemink

Representative recent papers authored by or including Engelhard are:

  • "Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020" (2020), published in Journal of Anxiety Disorders
  • "Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries" (2024), published in Science Advances
  • "A meta-analysis of conditioned fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders" (2022), published in Neuropsychopharmacology
  • "A review on mental imagery in fear conditioning research 100 years since the 'Little Albert' study" (2020), published in Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • "Human fear conditioning is moderated by stimulus contingency instructions" (2020), published in Biological Psychology

Best Publications

  • Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020.

    Gaëtan Mertens;Gaëtan Mertens;Lotte Gerritsen;Stefanie Duijndam;Elske Salemink

  • Updated Meta-Analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders

    Puck Duits;Danielle C. Cath;Shmuel Lissek;Joop J. Hox

  • Replicability and Generalizability of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Networks: A Cross-Cultural Multisite Study of PTSD Symptoms in Four Trauma Patient Samples

    Eiko I Fried;Marloes B Eidhof;Sabina Palic;Giulio Costantini

  • Self-Injurious Skin Picking: Clinical Characteristics and Comorbidity

    Sabine Wilhelm;Nancy J. Keuthen;Thilo Deckersbach;Iris M. Engelhard

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder after pregnancy loss

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Arnoud Arntz

  • Long-term Outcomes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety-Related Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Eva A. M. van Dis;Suzanne C. van Veen;Muriel A. Hagenaars;Neeltje M. Batelaan

  • How does EMDR work

    Marcel A. van den Hout;Iris M. Engelhard

  • Deployment-related stress and trauma in Dutch soldiers returning from Iraq. Prospective study.

    Iris M Engelhard;Marcel A van den Hout;Jos Weerts;Arnoud Arntz

  • Pre-trauma individual differences in extinction learning predict posttraumatic stress

    Miriam J.J. Lommen;Iris M. Engelhard;Marit Sijbrandij;Marit Sijbrandij;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • EMDR: eye movements superior to beeps in taxing working memory and reducing vividness of recollections.

    Marcel A. van den Hout;Iris M. Engelhard;Marleen M. Rijkeboer;Jutte Koekebakker

  • The impact of taxing working memory on negative and positive memories

    Iris M. Engelhard;Sophie L. van Uijen;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • Neuroticism and avoidance of ambiguous stimuli: Better safe than sorry?

    Miriam J.J. Lommen;Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout

  • Peritraumatic dissociation and posttraumatic stress after pregnancy loss: A prospective study.

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Merel Kindt;Arnoud Arntz

  • Taxing working memory reduces vividness and emotional intensity of images about the Queen's Day tragedy.

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Monique A.M. Smeets

  • Counting during recall: taxing of working memory and reduced vividness and emotionality of negative memories

    Marcel A. van den Hout;Iris M. Engelhard;Monique A. M. Smeets;Hellen Hornsveld

  • The Skin Picking Scale: scale construction and psychometric analyses.

    Nancy J Keuthen;Sabine Wilhelm;Thilo Deckersbach;Iris M Engelhard

  • Eye movements reduce vividness and emotionality of “flashforwards”

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Wilco C. Janssen;Jorinde van der Beek

  • Low specificity of symptoms on the post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom scale: a comparison of individuals with PTSD, individuals with other anxiety disorders and individuals without psychopathology.

    Iris M. Engelhard;Arnoud Arntz;Marcel A. Van den Hout

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder after pre-eclampsia: an exploratory study.

    Iris M Engelhard;Maartje van Rij;Inge Boullart;Timo H.A Ekhart

  • The relationship between neuroticism, pre-traumatic stress, and post-traumatic stress: a prospective study

    Iris M. Engelhard;Marcel A. van den Hout;Merel Kindt

  • Deployment-related stress and trauma in Dutch soldiers returning from Iraq

    I.M. Engelhard;M.A. van den Hout;J. Weerts;A.R. Arntz

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcel A. van den Hout
Marcel A. van den Hout Utrecht University
Danielle C. Cath
Danielle C. Cath Utrecht University
Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Marit Sijbrandij
Marit Sijbrandij Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rens van de Schoot
Rens van de Schoot Utrecht University
Richard J. McNally
Richard J. McNally Harvard University
Johanna M.P. Baas
Johanna M.P. Baas Utrecht University
Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Monique A. M. Smeets
Monique A. M. Smeets Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up many rewarding career opportunities, particularly in the field of marriage and family therapy (MFT). Many students explore online psychology or counseling degrees to gain the flexibility needed for balancing studies with other commitments. These programs are often the first step for those interested in helping couples, families, and individuals navigate life’s challenges.

Becoming an MFT requires meeting specific educational and licensing requirements, which can vary by location. For instance, if you want to learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Antonio, researching local regulations is crucial. Similarly, understanding the San Diego mft education requirements can help guide your choice of degree.

Those planning to practice in other regions should review local criteria. For those interested in the Bay Area, learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in San Francisco or how to become an mft in San Jose is essential.

Overall, online degrees in psychology or counseling can be a flexible and accessible way to enter this meaningful profession, provided you follow the correct pathway for your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Iris M. Engelhard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles