World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
92
Citations
28710
World Ranking
885
National Ranking
562

Neuroscience

D-Index
96
Citations
30446
World Ranking
874
National Ranking
470

Randolph Blake publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randolph Blake sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 434 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Randolph Blake D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randolph Blake sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Randolph Blake is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States, focusing primarily on the field of neuroscience. Their research encompasses multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, computer vision and pattern recognition, epidemiology, ophthalmology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The central themes of their work include visual perception and processing mechanisms, with 36 publications addressing this topic. Other significant areas of study focus on face recognition and perception, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, neural dynamics and brain function, visual attention and saliency detection, multisensory perception and integration, and glaucoma and retinal disorders.

Blake has published extensively, appearing repeatedly in journals such as the Journal of Vision, which features seven of their works. Other frequent publication venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with three publications, Behavior Research Methods and eLife with two each, and Attention Perception & Psychophysics with two publications.

Their recent papers illustrate the scope and variety of their research interests and include:

  • Visual-Tactile Spatial Multisensory Interaction in Adults With Autism and Schizophrenia (2020), published in Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The Perceptual Magic of Binocular Rivalry (2022), published in Current Directions in Psychological Science
  • CFS-crafter: An open-source tool for creating and analyzing images for continuous flash suppression experiments (2022), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • Judging Relative Onsets and Offsets of Audiovisual Events (2020), published in Vision
  • Optics and neural adaptation jointly limit human stereovision (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Collaborations have been an important part of Blake's research activity. Frequent coauthors include David Alais, Duje Tadin, Oakyoon Cha, Jacob Coorey, and Matthew Davidson, with multiple joint publications across various projects.

Blake has been recognized with several honors throughout their career. They have been elected a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 1987, a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences since 2006, and a Member of the National Academy of Sciences since 2012.

Best Publications

  • Brain Areas Involved in Perception of Biological Motion

    E. Grossman;M. Donnelly;R. Price;D. Pickens

  • Perception of Human Motion

    Randolph Blake;Maggie Shiffrar

  • Visual competition

    Unknown

  • Neural bases of binocular rivalry.

    Frank Tong;Ming Meng;Randolph Blake

  • Brain Areas Active during Visual Perception of Biological Motion

    Emily D Grossman;Randolph Blake

  • A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry

    Randolph Blake

  • Visual Recognition of Biological Motion is Impaired in Children With Autism

    Randolph Blake;Lauren M. Turner;Moria J. Smoski;Stacie L. Pozdol

  • Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.

    Alex Polonsky;Randolph Blake;Jochen Braun;David J. Heeger

  • Psychophysical magic : rendering the visible 'invisible'

    Chai-Youn Kim;Randolph Blake

  • Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression.

    Eunice Yang;David H. Zald;Randolph Blake

  • Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion

    E.D. Grossman;R. Blake

  • A Primer on Binocular Rivalry, Including Current Controversies

    Randolph Blake

  • The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation

    Randolph Blake;Robert Fox

  • Perceptual consequences of centre–surround antagonism in visual motion processing

    Duje Tadin;Joseph S. Lappin;Lee A. Gilroy;Randolph Blake

  • Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception

    Hugh R. Wilson;Randolph Blake;Sang-Hun Lee

  • Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry

    Sang Hun Lee;Randolph Blake;David J. Heeger

  • Further developments in binocular summation

    Randolph Blake;Michael Sloane;Robert Fox

  • Hearing What the Eyes See: Auditory Encoding of Visual Temporal Sequences

    Sharon E. Guttman;Lee A. Gilroy;Randolph Blake

  • Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry

    Naotsugu Tsuchiya;Christof Koch;Lee A. Gilroy;Randolph Blake

  • The perceptual reality of synesthetic colors

    Thomas J. Palmeri;Randolph Blake;René Marois;Marci A. Flanery

  • Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision

    Randolph Blake;Robert P. O'Shea;T. J. Mueller

Frequent Co-Authors

Duje Tadin
Duje Tadin University of Rochester
David J. Heeger
David J. Heeger New York University
David Alais
David Alais University of Sydney
Joseph S. Lappin
Joseph S. Lappin Vanderbilt University
Joel Pearson
Joel Pearson University of New South Wales
Sohee Park
Sohee Park Vanderbilt University
Katsumi Watanabe
Katsumi Watanabe Waseda University
Hugh R. Wilson
Hugh R. Wilson York University
Isabel Gauthier
Isabel Gauthier Vanderbilt University
Thomas J. Palmeri
Thomas J. Palmeri Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. For students eager to enter the field quickly, choosing an accelerated psychology degree online can be a smart way to build foundational knowledge and jumpstart a career in mental health or research.

Many professionals interested in behavioral and clinical roles also consider becoming Board Certified Behavior Analysts. Flexible bcba certification programs online offer accessible routes for those aiming to work with individuals with behavioral challenges—including those related to neurological disorders.

Social work is another rewarding career connected to neuroscience studies, particularly for students interested in mental health advocacy or client support. There are affordable options for those on a budget, like the cheapest online msw programs. For those preferring a faster route, the accelerated msw program online is an excellent choice.

Each of these online pathways offers flexibility and unique career prospects, helping students use their neuroscience background across a range of health, behavioral, or social service settings.

Best Scientists Citing Randolph Blake

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles