World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
84
Citations
31044
World Ranking
1376
National Ranking
23

Olaf Blanke publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olaf Blanke sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 462 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Olaf Blanke D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olaf Blanke sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olaf Blanke is affiliated with the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne in Switzerland. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience and medicine, with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. Within these broad fields, their work explores subfields including neurology, psychiatry and mental health, as well as social psychology and human-computer interaction.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics related to the neural basis of perception, consciousness, and motor control. Notable papers include:

  • "Breathing is coupled with voluntary action and the cortical readiness potential" (2020) in Nature Communications
  • "Evidence accumulation relates to perceptual consciousness and monitoring" (2021) in Nature Communications
  • "Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging" (2020) in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Sense of agency for intracortical brain-machine interfaces" (2022) in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Robot-induced hallucinations in Parkinson's disease depend on altered sensorimotor processing in fronto-temporal network" (2021) in Science Translational Medicine

Blanke´s collaborative network includes frequent coauthors such as Bruno Herbelin, Fosco Bernasconi, Nathan Faivre, Jevita Potheegadoo, and Pavo Orepić.

Their research has been published across various venues, with significant contributions appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cortex
  • Nature Communications
  • NeuroImage

Their work engages deeply with several research topics including:

  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

This body of work underlines Blanke's involvement with interdisciplinary approaches linking neuroscience, psychology, and technology to examine complex brain functions and their behavioral correlates.

Best Publications

  • Video Ergo Sum: Manipulating Bodily Self-Consciousness

    Bigna Lenggenhager;Tej Tadi;Thomas Metzinger;Olaf Blanke

  • Full-body illusions and minimal phenomenal selfhood

    Olaf Blanke;Olaf Blanke;Thomas Metzinger;Thomas Metzinger

  • Multisensory brain mechanisms of bodily self-consciousness

    Olaf Blanke

  • First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality.

    Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Bernhard Spanlang;Bernhard Spanlang;María Victoria Sánchez-Vives;Olaf Blanke

  • Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions

    Olaf Blanke;Stéphanie Ortigue;Theodor Landis;Margitta Seeck

  • Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin

    Olaf Blanke;Theodor Landis;Laurent Spinelli;Margitta Seeck

  • Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction

    Olaf Blanke;Christine Mohr;Christoph M Michel;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • Behavioral, Neural, and Computational Principles of Bodily Self-Consciousness

    Olaf Blanke;Olaf Blanke;Mel Slater;Mel Slater;Andrea Serino

  • The Out-of-Body Experience: Disturbed Self-Processing at the Temporo-Parietal Junction:

    Olaf Blanke;Shahar Arzy

  • The thalamocortical vestibular system in animals and humans

    Christophe Lopez;Olaf Blanke

  • Multisensory Mechanisms in Temporo-Parietal Cortex Support Self-Location and First-Person Perspective

    Silvio Ionta;Lukas Heydrich;Bigna Lenggenhager;Michael Mouthon

  • Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area

    Shahar Arzy;Gregor Thut;Christine Mohr;Christoph M. Michel

  • Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin Implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness

    Olaf Blanke;Christine Mohr

  • The human vestibular cortex revealed by coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

    Christophe Lopez;Olaf Blanke;Fred W. Mast

  • Body ownership and embodiment: vestibular and multisensory mechanisms.

    Christophe Lopez;P. Halje;O. Blanke

  • Non-invasive epileptic focus localization using EEG-triggered functional MRI and electromagnetic tomography

    M Seeck;F Lazeyras;C.M Michel;O Blanke

  • Visual capture and the experience of having two bodies – Evidence from two different virtual reality techniques

    Lukas Heydrich;Trevor J. Dodds;Jane E. Aspell;Bruno Herbelin

  • Brain system for mental orientation in space, time, and person.

    Michael Peer;Roy Salomon;Ilan Goldberg;Ilan Goldberg;Olaf Blanke

  • Turning Body and Self Inside Out Visualized Heartbeats Alter Bodily Self-Consciousness and Tactile Perception

    Jane Elizabeth Aspell;Lukas Heydrich;Guillaume Marillier;Tom Lavanchy

  • Induction of an illusory shadow person

    Shahar Arzy;Margitta Seeck;Stephanie Ortigue;Laurent Spinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea Serino
Andrea Serino University Hospital of Lausanne
Margitta Seeck
Margitta Seeck University of Geneva
Christoph M. Michel
Christoph M. Michel University of Geneva
Theodor Landis
Theodor Landis University of Geneva
Bigna Lenggenhager
Bigna Lenggenhager University of Zurich
Laurent Spinelli
Laurent Spinelli University of Geneva
Gregor Thut
Gregor Thut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Michiel van Elk
Michiel van Elk Leiden University Medical Center
Hannes Bleuler
Hannes Bleuler École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Christine Mohr
Christine Mohr University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider various related fields that are available through flexible online study. Popular online degree options include psychology, social work, counseling, and marriage and family therapy—all of which intersect with neuroscience in both research and clinical practice.

Cost is a common concern, and students can compare the psychology degree cost when searching for affordable pathways. For those interested in social work, there are schools offering the easiest msw program to gain admission into, making social work more accessible for a broader range of applicants.

If you're considering a future in clinical psychology, many universities now provide online accredited psyd programs. These allow students to specialize and advance in the mental health field without relocating. Alternatively, careers in marriage and family therapy can begin with mft online programs, some of which can be completed in a shorter time frame.

Choosing an online program can help you balance your academic ambitions with cost, accessibility, and career goals within neuroscience and its related pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Olaf Blanke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles