World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
18448
World Ranking
2209
National Ranking
48

Margitta Seeck publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margitta Seeck sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 390 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Margitta Seeck D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margitta Seeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Margitta Seeck is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and neurology.

The primary topics of Seeck's research include epilepsy research and treatment, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, functional brain connectivity studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, neural dynamics and brain function, as well as advanced MRI techniques and applications.

The scientist has authored numerous papers published in notable venues. Some recent publications include:

  • "Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study," 2020, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement," 2022, Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • "Ictal EEG source localization in focal epilepsy: Review and future perspectives," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Evidence accumulation relates to perceptual consciousness and monitoring," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "The ENIGMA-Epilepsy working group: Mapping disease from large data sets," 2020, Human Brain Mapping

Margitta Seeck has frequently collaborated with several researchers, including:

  • Serge Vulliémoz
  • Pia De Stefano
  • Laurent Spinelli
  • Pierre Mégevand
  • Laurent Sheybani

The primary publication venues where Seeck's research appears include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Clinical Neurophysiology Practice
  • Clinical Epileptology
  • Epilepsia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Stimulating illusory own-body perceptions

    Olaf Blanke;Stéphanie Ortigue;Theodor Landis;Margitta Seeck

  • Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin

    Olaf Blanke;Theodor Landis;Laurent Spinelli;Margitta Seeck

  • Linking Out-of-Body Experience and Self Processing to Mental Own-Body Imagery at the Temporoparietal Junction

    Olaf Blanke;Christine Mohr;Christoph M Michel;Alvaro Pascual-Leone

  • The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN

    Margitta Seeck;Laurent Koessler;Thomas Bast;Frans Leijten

  • Epileptic source localization with high density EEG: how many electrodes are needed?

    G Lantz;R Grave de Peralta;L Spinelli;M Seeck

  • Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients

    Verena Brodbeck;Laurent Jean-François Spinelli;Agustina Maria Lascano;Michael Wissmeier

  • Seizure outcome and use of antiepileptic drugs after epilepsy surgery according to histopathological diagnosis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

    Herm J Lamberink;Willem M Otte;Ingmar Blümcke;Kees P J Braun

  • Non-invasive epileptic focus localization using EEG-triggered functional MRI and electromagnetic tomography

    M Seeck;F Lazeyras;C.M Michel;O Blanke

  • Seizure-like phenomena and propofol: A systematic review

    Bernhard Walder;Martin R. Tramèr;Margitta Seeck

  • Induction of an illusory shadow person

    Shahar Arzy;Margitta Seeck;Stephanie Ortigue;Laurent Spinelli

  • Electric source imaging of human brain functions

    Christoph M Michel;Gregor Thut;Stéphanie Morand;Asaid Khateb

  • Electromagnetic inverse solutions in anatomically constrained spherical head models.

    Laurent Spinelli;Sara Gonzalez Andino;Goran Lantz;Goran Lantz;Margitta Seeck

  • 128-channel EEG source imaging in epilepsy: clinical yield and localization precision.

    Christoph M. Michel;Göran Lantz;Laurent Spinelli;F. Rolando Grave De Peralta

  • Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement

    Unknown

  • Propagation of interictal epileptiform activity can lead to erroneous source localizations: a 128-channel EEG mapping study

    Göran Lantz;Laurent Spinelli;Margitta Seeck;Rolando Grave de Peralta Menendez

  • Evidence for rapid face recognition from human scalp and intracranial electrodes.

    Seeck M;Michel Cm;Mainwaring N;Cosgrove R

  • With or without spikes: localization of focal epileptic activity by simultaneous electroencephalography and functional magnetic resonance imaging

    Frédéric Grouiller;Rachel C Thornton;Kristina Groening;Laurent Jean-François Spinelli

  • Neural Sources and Underlying Mechanisms of Neural Responses to Heartbeats, and their Role in Bodily Self-consciousness: An Intracranial EEG Study.

    Hyeong-Dong Park;Fosco Bernasconi;Roy Salomon;Catherine Tallon-Baudry

  • Temporal precedence of emotion over attention modulations in the lateral amygdala: Intracranial ERP evidence from a patient with temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Gilles Pourtois;Laurent Jean-François Spinelli;Laurent Jean-François Spinelli;Margitta Seeck;Margitta Seeck;Patrik Vuilleumier

  • Involvement of GATOR complex genes in familial focal epilepsies and focal cortical dysplasia.

    Sarah Weckhuysen;Elise Marsan;Virginie Lambrecq;Cécile Marchal

  • EEG source imaging in pediatric epilepsy surgery: a new perspective in presurgical workup.

    Francesca Sperli;Laurent Spinelli;Margitta Seeck;Mary Kurian

  • Extracranial localization of intracranial interictal epileptiform activity using LORETA (low resolution electromagnetic tomography)

    G. Lantz;C.M. Michel;R.D. Pascual-Marqui;L. Spinelli

Frequent Co-Authors

Serge Vulliemoz
Serge Vulliemoz University of Geneva
Christoph M. Michel
Christoph M. Michel University of Geneva
Laurent Spinelli
Laurent Spinelli University of Geneva
Olaf Blanke
Olaf Blanke École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Theodor Landis
Theodor Landis University of Geneva
Alan J. Pegna
Alan J. Pegna University of Queensland
François Lazeyras
François Lazeyras University of Geneva
Gregor Thut
Gregor Thut Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Patrik Vuilleumier
Patrik Vuilleumier University of Geneva
Andrea O. Rossetti
Andrea O. Rossetti University of Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in neuroscience but seeking flexible or alternative options, online degrees in related fields offer a wide range of career pathways. Popular choices include psychology, social work, clinical psychology, and marriage and family therapy. Many of these programs are designed for working professionals or students who need to balance study with other commitments.

If you’re looking for affordability, consider the cheapest online psychology degree programs, which provide a strong foundation in understanding human behavior and mental processes—key concepts in neuroscience careers.

For those interested in social work, the easiest msw program options open pathways for roles in counseling, community outreach, and mental health services.

Aspiring clinical psychologists can explore accredited online psyd clinical psychology programs, which blend advanced theory with hands-on practice.

Those who want to specialize in family and relationship therapy may prefer an online lmft program offering a streamlined path to licensure and clinical careers.

Exploring these online degrees allows you to tailor your education to match your career goals within or beyond neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Margitta Seeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles