World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6529
World Ranking
9143
National Ranking
534

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6551
World Ranking
8744
National Ranking
262

Alan J. Pegna publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Pegna sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 179 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alan J. Pegna D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Pegna sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan J. Pegna is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia and conducts research primarily within the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work concentrates on cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

They have made significant contributions to several main topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Visual Perception and Processing Mechanisms
  • Neural Dynamics and Brain Function
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Alan J. Pegna's recent publications include:

  • Rapid processing of fearful faces relies on the right amygdala: evidence from individuals undergoing unilateral temporal lobectomy, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Spatial attention shifting to emotional faces is contingent on awareness and task relevancy, 2022, Cortex
  • Attention and prediction modulations in expected and unexpected visuospatial trajectories, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Neural activities during the Processing of unattended and unseen emotional faces: a voxel-wise Meta-analysis, 2022, Brain Imaging and Behavior
  • Spatial attention shifting to fearful faces depends on visual awareness in attentional blink: An ERP study, 2022, Neuropsychologia

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Alan J. Pegna include:

  • Zeguo Qiu
  • Stefanie I. Becker
  • David Framorando
  • Eleanor Moses
  • Patrick Johnston

The scientist's work has appeared in several notable publication venues, such as:

  • Biological Psychology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Cortex
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology

Best Publications

  • Language Control and Lexical Competition in Bilinguals: An Event-Related fMRI Study

    Jubin Abutalebi;Jean Marie Annoni;Jean Marie Annoni;Ivan Zimine;Alan J. Pegna;Alan J. Pegna

  • Discriminating emotional faces without primary visual cortices involves the right amygdala.

    Alan J Pegna;Asaid Khateb;Francois Lazeyras;Mohamed L Seghier

  • A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion.

    Eugène Mayer;Marie-Dominique Martory;Alan J. Pegna;Theodor Landis

  • Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity.

    Guillaume Thierry;Clara D Martin;Clara D Martin;Paul Downing;Alan J Pegna

  • Electric source imaging of human brain functions

    Christoph M Michel;Gregor Thut;Stéphanie Morand;Asaid Khateb

  • Variability of fMRI Activation During a Phonological and Semantic Language Task in Healthy Subjects

    Mohamed L. Seghier;François Lazeyras;Alan J. Pegna;Jean-Marie Annoni

  • An event-related potential component sensitive to images of the human body

    Guillaume Thierry;Alan J. Pegna;Alan J. Pegna;Chris Dodds;Chris Dodds;Mark Roberts

  • Intact navigation skills after bilateral loss of striate cortex

    Beatrice de Gelder;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto;Geert van Boxtel;Rainer Goebel

  • Neural correlates of emotion-attention interactions : From perception, learning, and memory to social cognition, individual differences, and training interventions

    Florin Dolcos;Yuta Katsumi;Matthew Moore;Nick Berggren

  • Electrophysiological evidence for early non-conscious processing of fearful facial expressions.

    Alan J. Pegna;Theodor Landis;Asaid Khateb

  • Noradrenergic modulation of cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons demonstrated by in vitro pharmacological and immunohistochemical evidence in the guinea-pig brain.

    Patrice Fort;A. Khateb;A. Pegna;Michel Muhlethaler

  • Cholinergic nucleus basalis neurons are excited by histamine in vitro

    A. Khateb;Patrice Fort;A. Pegna;B. E. Jones

  • So near yet so far: neglect in far or near space depends on tool use.

    Alan J. Pegna;Leila Petit;Anne-Sarah Caldara-Schnetzer;Asaid Khateb

  • Unraveling the cerebral dynamics of mental imagery.

    Alan J. Pegna;Asaid Khateb;Laurent Spinelli;Margitta Seeck

  • Chronic deep brain stimulation in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Colette Boex;Margitta Seeck;Serge Vulliemoz;Andrea O Rossetti

  • Amygdala Activation for Eye Contact Despite Complete Cortical Blindness

    Nicolas Burra;Alexis Hervais-Adelman;Dirk Kerzel;Marco Tamietto;Marco Tamietto

  • Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

    Alan J. Pegna;Asaid Khateb;Christoph M. Michel;Theodor Landis

  • Face-Sensitive Processes One Hundred Milliseconds after Picture Onset

    Benjamin Dering;Clara D. Martin;Sancho Moro;Alan J. Pegna

  • Representation of anatomical constraints in motor imagery: mental rotation of a body segment.

    L.S. Petit;A.J. Pegna;E. Mayer;C.-A. Hauert

  • Is the N170 sensitive to the human face or to several intertwined perceptual and conceptual factors

    Guillaume Thierry;Clara D Martin;Clara D Martin;Paul E Downing;Alan J Pegna

  • Visual imagery influences brain responses to visual stimulation in bilateral cortical blindness.

    Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Beatrice de Gelder;Marco Tamietto;Alan J. Pegna;Jan Van den Stock

Frequent Co-Authors

Asaid Khateb
Asaid Khateb University of Haifa
Christoph M. Michel
Christoph M. Michel University of Geneva
Theodor Landis
Theodor Landis University of Geneva
Jean-Marie Annoni
Jean-Marie Annoni University of Fribourg
Margitta Seeck
Margitta Seeck University of Geneva
Beatrice de Gelder
Beatrice de Gelder Maastricht University
François Lazeyras
François Lazeyras University of Geneva
Marco Tamietto
Marco Tamietto University of Turin
Mohamed L. Seghier
Mohamed L. Seghier Khalifa University
Laurent Spinelli
Laurent Spinelli University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to diverse career options, both within and beyond the lab. Many students complement their neuroscience background with related online degrees, which can broaden professional opportunities in healthcare, counseling, and social services.

For those interested in therapy or counseling, a masters in marriage and family therapy online offers specialized training in supporting families and couples. Alternatively, earning a masters in psychology online provides foundational skills for research, clinical work, or organizational roles.

Looking for flexibility or just starting out? Consider an accredited online psychology degree to develop a solid understanding of human behavior—an asset across many neuroscience-adjacent careers. Similarly, those wishing to enter the field of social work may benefit from exploring the easiest msw programs to get into, combining neuroscience knowledge with practical skills for supporting communities.

These online programs offer flexible study options, affordability, and the potential to blend neuroscience expertise with other in-demand skills—paving the way for varied and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Pegna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles