World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 11008 10305 123 117 141 3238

Marina Laganaro publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marina Laganaro between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marina Laganaro published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2018. 13 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2018. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
2001 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marina Laganaro: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 4
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 5
2011 5
2012 6
2013 9
2014 11
2015 10
2016 11
2017 7
2018 13
2019 11
2020 9
2021 12
2022 10
2023 10
2024 6
2025 7
Total 167
Download as CSV

Marina Laganaro publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Laganaro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marina Laganaro D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marina Laganaro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marina Laganaro is affiliated with the University of Geneva in Switzerland and conducts research primarily in the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine. Their scientific work spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, physiology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and clinical psychology.

Their research focuses on core topics such as neurobiology of language and bilingualism, language development and disorders, voice and speech disorders, reading and literacy development, phonetics and phonology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and stuttering research and treatment.

Among the recent academic papers associated with their field and collaborations, notable examples include:

  • "Predictors of Poststroke Aphasia Recovery," 2021, published in Stroke
  • "Sensitivity and specificity of an acoustic- and perceptual-based tool for assessing motor speech disorders in French: the MonPaGe-screening protocol," 2021, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
  • "Precision rehabilitation for aphasia by patient age, sex, aphasia severity, and time since stroke? A prespecified, systematic review-based, individual participant data, network, subgroup meta-analysis," 2022, International Journal of Stroke
  • "Complex speech-language therapy interventions for stroke-related aphasia: the RELEASE study incorporating a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis," 2022, Health and Social Care Delivery Research
  • "Perceptual Classification of Motor Speech Disorders: The Role of Severity, Speech Task, and Listener's Expertise," 2022, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Laganaro has collaborated frequently with researchers such as Mónica Lancheros, Bertrand Glize, Cécile Fougeron, Michaëla Pernon, and Frédéric Assal.

Their publications appear regularly in journals that include:

  • Aphasiology
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Brain Sciences
  • Brain Topography
  • Neuropsychologia

Best Publications

  • Predictors of picture naming speed.

    F Xavier Alario;Ludovic Ferrand;Marina Laganaro;Boris New

  • Receptive amusia: temporal auditory processing deficit in a professional musician following a left temporo-parietal lesion.

    Marie Di Pietro;Marina Laganaro;Béatrice Leemann;Armin Schnider

  • On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production

    Marina Laganaro;F.-Xavier Alario

  • Comparing Electrophysiological Correlates of Word Production in Immediate and Delayed Naming Through the Analysis of Word Age of Acquisition Effects

    Marina Laganaro;Cyril Perret

  • Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review–Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis

    Marian C. Brady;Myzoon Ali;Kathryn VandenBerg;Linda J. Williams

  • Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers: A high density ERP topographic study

    Marina Laganaro;Andrea Valente;Cyril Perret

  • Computerised treatment of anomia in acute aphasia: Treatment intensity and training size

    Marina Laganaro;Marie Di Pietro;Armin Schnider

  • Comparison of electrophysiological correlates of writing and speaking: a topographic ERP analysis.

    Cyril Perret;Marina Laganaro

  • Selective impairment of lexical stress assignment in an Italian-speaking aphasic patient.

    Marina Laganaro;Francesca Vacheresse;Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder

  • Time course of evoked-potential changes in different forms of anomia in aphasia

    Marina Laganaro;Stéphanie Morand;Armin Schnider

  • Acquired alexia in multilingual aphasia and computer-assisted treatment in both languages: issues of generalisation and transfer.

    Marina Laganaro;Mary Overton Venet

  • Inter-subject variability modulates phonological advance planning in the production of adjective-noun phrases.

    Violaine Michel Lange;Marina Laganaro

  • ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: a trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response.

    Andrea Valente;Audrey Bürki;Marina Laganaro

  • Electrophysiological correlates of different anomic patterns in comparison with normal word production.

    Marina Laganaro;Stéphanie Morand;Stéphanie Morand;Valérie Schwitter;Carmel Zimmermann

  • Syllable frequency effect in speech production: evidence from aphasia

    Marina Laganaro

  • Phonologically driven variability: the case of determiners.

    Audrey Bürki;Marina Laganaro;F Xavier Alario

  • French normative data and naming times for action pictures.

    Valérie Schwitter;Bruno Boyer;Alain Méot;Patrick Bonin

  • Does facilitation by phonological cuing in picture naming depend on the modality of the cue

    Pauline Pellet Cheneval;Caroline Bonnans;Marina Laganaro

  • Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls.

    Marina Laganaro;Grégoire Python;Ulrike Toepel

  • Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis

    Cyril Perret;Patrick Bonin;Patrick Bonin;Marina Laganaro

  • Computerised treatment of anomia in chronic and acute aphasia: An exploratory study

    Marina Laganaro;Marie Di Pietro;Armin Schnider

  • Is there a syllable frequency effect in aphasia or in apraxia of speech or both

    Marina Laganaro

  • Crossover Trial of Subacute Computerized Aphasia Therapy for Anomia With the Addition of Either Levodopa or Placebo

    Béatrice Anne Valérie Leemann;Marina Laganaro;Daphné Chetelat-Mabillard;Armin Schnider

Frequent Co-Authors

Armin Schnider
Armin Schnider University of Geneva
Jean-Marie Annoni
Jean-Marie Annoni University of Fribourg
Pam Enderby
Pam Enderby University of Sheffield
Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
David Howard
David Howard Newcastle University
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph University of Cambridge
Katerina Hilari
Katerina Hilari City, University of London
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. Increasingly, students are turning to online psychology programs, which offer flexibility and the chance to specialize in in-demand areas such as Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA).

One popular specialty is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Each region may have specific education and certification requirements. For example, students interested in working in Michigan can review Detroit bcba requirements. Those looking at opportunities in North Carolina should check the Durham bcba education requirements.

In Texas, understanding the El Paso bcba education requirements is crucial, while aspiring professionals in Indiana need to follow the bcba certification requirements in Fort Wayne.

Exploring these requirements can help you plan the best pathway to licensure and employment, no matter where you are located. Online degrees make it easier to access coursework and meet these qualifications while balancing work and life.

Best Scientists Citing Marina Laganaro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles