World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7629 7118 451 440 182 6273

Miranda Rose publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Miranda Rose between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Miranda Rose published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2021. 15 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2021. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 14 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Miranda Rose: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 4
2004 1
2005 9
2006 7
2007 4
2008 6
2009 5
2010 2
2011 5
2012 3
2013 17
2014 17
2015 14
2016 16
2017 8
2018 18
2019 17
2020 7
2021 22
2022 16
2023 14
2024 18
2025 14
2026 1
Total 249
Download as CSV

Miranda Rose publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miranda Rose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 182 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 182
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Miranda Rose D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Miranda Rose sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Miranda Rose is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia and has an extensive publication record focusing primarily on neurological and rehabilitation sciences.

Their research spans several key fields of study, notably:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience

Within these fields, more specific subfields addressed include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation
  • General Health Professions
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health

Their main research topics cover various areas related to brain function, language, and recovery processes:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Among their frequently published venues are:

  • Aphasiology
  • Disability and Rehabilitation
  • Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Stroke

Prominent coauthors regularly appearing with Miranda Rose include:

  • Erin Godecke
  • John E. Pierce
  • Dominique A. Cadilhac
  • Marcella Carragher
  • David A. Copland

Examples of their recent publications provide insight into their research focus:

  • "Aphasia disrupts usual care: the stroke team's perceptions of delivering healthcare to patients with aphasia" (2020) in Disability and Rehabilitation
  • "A randomized control trial of intensive aphasia therapy after acute stroke: The Very Early Rehabilitation for SpEech (VERSE) study" (2020) in International Journal of Stroke
  • "Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia" (2022) in Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • "Dose effects in behavioural treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020) in Disability and Rehabilitation
  • "A systematic review of maintenance following intensive therapy programs in chronic post-stroke aphasia: importance of individual response analysis" (2021) in Disability and Rehabilitation

Best Publications

  • The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement†

    Robyn L. Tate;Michael Perdices;Ulrike Rosenkoetter;William Shadish

  • Translational Research in Aphasia: From Neuroscience to Neurorehabilitation

    Anastasia M. Raymer;Pelagie Beeson;Audrey Holland;Diane Kendall

  • Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions

    Miranda Rose;Alison Ferguson;Emma Power;Leanne Togher

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • A systematic review of rehabilitation interventions to prevent and treat depression in post-stroke aphasia

    Caroline Baker;Linda Worrall;Miranda Rose;Kyla Hudson

  • The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia

    Miranda L. Rose

  • Interviewing people with aphasia: Insights into method adjustments from a pilot study

    Amy M. Luck;Miranda L. Rose

  • Scaffolding academic literacy with indigenous health sciences students: An evaluative study

    David Rose;Miranda Rose;Sally Farrington;Susan Page

  • Transforming practice through clinical education, professional supervision, and mentoring

    Miranda. Rose;Dawn. Best

  • The comparative effectiveness of gesture and verbal treatments for a specific phonologic naming impairment

    Miranda Rose;Jacinta Douglas;Thomas Matyas

  • The efficacy of outpatient and community-based aphasia group interventions: a systematic review.

    Lucette E Lanyon;Miranda L Rose;Linda Worrall

  • The efficacy of repetition, semantic, and gesture treatments for verb retrieval and use in Broca's aphasia

    Michelle Boo;Miranda L. Rose

  • Current Australian speech-language pathology practice in addressing psychological well-being in people with aphasia after stroke

    Jasvinder K. Sekhon;Jacinta Douglas;Miranda L. Rose

  • The differential facilitatory effects of gesture and visualisation processes on object naming in aphasia

    Miranda Rose;Jacinta Douglas

  • A systematic review of gesture treatments for post-stroke aphasia

    Miranda L. Rose;Anastasia M. Raymer;Lucie E. Lanyon;Michelle C. Attard

  • Do the hands have it? The facilitation effects of arm and hand gesture on word retrieval in aphasia

    Lucette. Lanyon;Miranda Lee. Rose

  • Intensive comprehensive aphasia programs: an international survey of practice

    Miranda L. Rose;Leora R. Cherney;Linda E. Worrall

  • Dosage, Intensity, and Frequency of Language Therapy for Aphasia: A Systematic Review–Based, Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis

    Marian C. Brady;Myzoon Ali;Kathryn VandenBerg;Linda J. Williams

  • The Relationship of Aphasia Type and Gesture Production in People With Aphasia

    Kazuki Sekine;Kazuki Sekine;Miranda L. Rose

  • The effects of semantic and gesture treatments on verb retrieval and verb use in aphasia

    Miranda Rose;Grace Sussmilch

  • The top ten: best practice recommendations for aphasia

    Nina Simmons-Mackie;Linda Worrall;Laura L. Murray;Pam Enderby

  • Gesture production patterns in aphasic discourse: In-depth description and preliminary predictions

    Kazuki Sekine;Kazuki Sekine;Miranda L. Rose;Miranda L. Rose;Abby M. Foster;Abby M. Foster;Michelle C. Attard;Michelle C. Attard

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Worrall
Linda Worrall University of Queensland
Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher University of Sydney
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona
Julie Bernhardt
Julie Bernhardt Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Graeme J. Hankey
Graeme J. Hankey University of Western Australia
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Jacinta Douglas
Jacinta Douglas La Trobe University
David A. Copland
David A. Copland University of Queensland
Robyn L. Tate
Robyn L. Tate University of Sydney
David L. Gast
David L. Gast University of Georgia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an education in Psychology opens the door to a range of online degrees and specialized career paths in counseling, mental health, and therapy. Many universities in the USA now offer flexible online programs, including accelerated options for students who want to enter the workforce more quickly. For instance, those interested in fast-track options may want to learn more about Texas accelerated counseling degrees online, which can dramatically reduce the time it takes to earn your degree.

Cost is also a major consideration. Students aiming to minimize student debt should explore affordable choices, such as the cheapest counseling degrees in Arizona, the cheapest counseling degrees in Berkeley, or the most affordable counseling degree programs in Boston. These programs not only support students financially but also help make a counseling career more accessible.

Selecting the right pathway depends on your personal goals, budget, and preferred learning format. With more accredited online degrees appearing nationwide, pursuing a Psychology or Counseling career in the USA is more achievable than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Miranda Rose

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles