World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5197
World Ranking
8005
National Ranking
791

Jane Marshall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Marshall sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane Marshall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Marshall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Marshall is affiliated with City, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on cognitive neuroscience and rehabilitation. Additional subfields include general health professions, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

The main topics in their work revolve around neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stroke rehabilitation and recovery, cerebral palsy and movement disorders, interpreting and communication in healthcare, mental health and patient involvement, traumatic brain injury research, and language, metaphor, and cognition.

Recent publications by Jane Marshall include:

  • A randomised trial of social support group intervention for people with aphasia: A Novel application of virtual reality (2020, PLoS ONE)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jane Marshall are:

  • Madeline Cruice (17 joint works)
  • Katerina Hilari (13 joint works)
  • Stephanie Wilson (11 joint works)
  • Niamh Devane (9 joint works)
  • Nicholas Behn (9 joint works)

Publication venues where Jane Marshall commonly publishes include:

  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (7 publications)
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (7 publications)
  • Aphasiology (6 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (2 publications)
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (2 publications)

Among notable recent papers in the broader field related to their research are:

  • UK speech and language therapists' views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation (2020, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders)
  • Supporting wellbeing through peer-befriending (SUPERB) for people with aphasia: A feasibility randomised controlled trial (2021, Clinical Rehabilitation)
  • Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: a systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base (2020, Aphasiology)
  • Creating a Theoretical Framework to Underpin Discourse Assessment and Intervention in Aphasia (2021, Brain Sciences)

Best Publications

  • Psychological distress after stroke and aphasia: the first six months

    Katerina Hilari;Sarah Northcott;Penny Roy;Jenny Marshall

  • A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement:

    Sarah J. Wallace;Linda Worrall;Tanya Rose;Guylaine Le Dorze

  • Aphasia in a user of British Sign Language: Dissociation between sign and gesture.

    Jane Marshall;Jo Atkinson;Elaine Smulovitch;Alice Thacker

  • The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retrieval in aphasic patients

    J. Marshall;C. Pound;M. White-thomson;T. Pring

  • Verb Retrieval and Sentence Production in Aphasia

    Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • Psychometric properties of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) in a generic stroke population

    Katerina Hilari;Donna L Lamping;Sarah C Smith;Sarah Northcott

  • Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon. Part 1—nouns

    Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat;Jo Robson

  • Codesign for People with Aphasia Through Tangible Design Languages

    Stephanie Wilson;Abi Roper;Jane Marshall;Julia Galliers

  • A comparison of remote therapy, face to face therapy and an attention control intervention for people with aphasia: a quasi-randomised controlled feasibility study

    Celia Woolf;Anna Caute;Zula Haigh;Julia Galliers

  • Training volunteers as conversation partners for people with aphasia.

    Helen Rayner;Jane Marshall

  • Evaluating the Benefits of Aphasia Intervention Delivered in Virtual Reality: Results of a Quasi-Randomised Study

    Jane Marshall;Tracey Booth;Niamh Devane;Julia Galliers

  • Why does monitoring fail in jargon aphasia? comprehension, judgment, and therapy evidence.

    Jane Marshall;Jo Robson;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • Words are not enough: empowering people with aphasia in the design process

    Julia Galliers;Stephanie Wilson;Abi Roper;Naomi Cocks

  • Sentence processing therapy: Working at the level of the event

    J. Marshall;T. Pring;S. Chiat

  • Phonological naming therapy in jargon aphasia: positive but paradoxical effects.

    Jo Robson;Jane Marshall;Tim Pring;Shula Chiat

  • An impairment in processing verbs' thematic roles: A therapy study

    Jane Marshall;Shula Chiat;Tim Pring

  • Testing comprehension abilities in users of British Sign Language following CVA.

    Jo Atkinson;Jane Marshall;Bencie Woll;Alice Thacker

  • Gesture and Naming Therapy for People with Severe Aphasia: A Group Study.

    Jane Marshall;Wendy Best;Naomi Cocks;Madeline Cruice

  • Jargon aphasia: What have we learned?

    Jane Marshall

  • The mapping hypothesis and aphasia therapy

    Jane Marshall

  • Drawing together: evaluation of a therapy programme for severe aphasia

    Carol Sacchett;Sally Byng;Jane Marshall;Carole Pound

  • What Factors Predict Who Will Have a Strong Social Network Following a Stroke

    Sarah Northcott;Jane Marshall;Katerina Hilari

  • Written communication in undifferentiated jargon aphasia : a therapy study

    Jo Robson;Tim Pring;Jane Marshall;Sarah Morrison

  • Understanding ‘not’: neuropsychological dissociations between hand and head markers of negation in BSL

    Jo Atkinson;Ruth Campbell;Jane Marshall;Alice Thacker

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Pring
Tim Pring City, University of London
Katerina Hilari
Katerina Hilari City, University of London
Bencie Woll
Bencie Woll University College London
Shula Chiat
Shula Chiat City, University of London
Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher University of Sydney
Alistair Burns
Alistair Burns University of Manchester
John Keady
John Keady University of Manchester
Nicola Botting
Nicola Botting City, University of London
Miranda Rose
Miranda Rose La Trobe University
Karen Sage
Karen Sage Sheffield Hallam University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens a variety of pathways, from clinical practice to behavioral health leadership. As the demand for flexible education grows, many prospective students are seeking affordable bcba masters programs online to begin or advance their careers in applied behavior analysis. These programs offer practical, in-demand credentials with the convenience of remote learning.

For those interested in working directly with clients or patients, options such as affordable clinical psychology graduate programs online provide crucial training while allowing working professionals to maintain their current commitments. For those aspiring towards leadership or research roles, finding the cheapest online doctoral degree in psychology can be a strategic way to balance advanced education with budget considerations.

Individuals aiming to lead within healthcare systems may consider the cheapest psyd behavioral health leadership programs, which focus on administrative and leadership skills in behavioral health environments. Choosing the right online program ensures you receive quality education, robust career opportunities, and the flexibility to advance on your own terms.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Marshall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles