World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alfonso Caramazza

Alfonso Caramazza

Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
137
Citations
63576
World Ranking
130
National Ranking
81

Neuroscience

D-Index
137
Citations
63746
World Ranking
219
National Ranking
141

Alfonso Caramazza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfonso Caramazza sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 481 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alfonso Caramazza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alfonso Caramazza sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 137 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award

Overview

Alfonso Caramazza is a researcher affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their work primarily focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with notable contributions in Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist has published research on several topics including:

  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Alfonso Caramazza's recent papers include:

  • Preserved recognition of basic visual features despite lack of awareness of shape: Evidence from a case of neglect (2024, Cortex)
  • Dissociating goal from outcome during action observation (2024, Cerebral Cortex)

Their research has been published predominantly in the journals Cortex and Cerebral Cortex.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Caramazza include Seda Akbıyık, Teresa Schubert, Shuchen Liu, and Moritz F. Wurm.

Best Publications

  • Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction

    Alfonso Caramazza;Jennifer R. Shelton

  • A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: evidence from aphasia

    Alfonso Caramazza;Edgar B. Zurif

  • How many levels of processing are there in lexical access

    Alfonso Caramazza

  • Lexical access and inflectional morphology

    Alfonso Caramazza;Alessandro Laudanna;Cristina Romani

  • Curvilinear Motion in the Absence of External Forces: Naïve Beliefs About the Motion of Objects

    Michael McCloskey;Alfonso Caramazza;Bert Green

  • Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: evidence from dyscalculia

    Michael McCloskey;Alfonso Caramazza;Annamaria Basili

  • A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications

    Marc D. Hauser;Fiery Cushman;Liane Young;R. Kang-Xing Jin

  • The Cognate Facilitation Effect: Implications for Models of Lexical Access

    Albert Costa;Alfonso Caramazza;Nuria Sebastian-Galles

  • Lexical organization of nouns and verbs in the brain

    Alfonso Caramazza;Argye E. Hillis

  • Lexical Selection in Bilinguals: Do Words in the Bilingual's Two Lexicons Compete for Selection?

    Albert Costa;Albert Costa;Michelle Miozzo;Alfonso Caramazza

  • On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: the case for single-patient studies.

    Alfonso Caramazza

  • The multiple semantics hypothesis: Multiple confusions?

    Alfonso Caramazza;Argye E. Hillis;Brenda C. Rapp;Cristina Romani

  • CATEGORY-SPECIFIC NAMING AND COMPREHENSION IMPAIRMENT: A DOUBLE DISSOCIATION

    Argye E. Hillis;Alfonso Caramazza

  • On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main Verbs

    Gabriele Miceli;Gabriele Miceli;M. Caterina Silveri;M. Caterina Silveri;Giampiero Villa;Giampiero Villa;Alfonso Caramazza;Alfonso Caramazza

  • What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence.

    Erminio Capitani;M. Laiacona;B. Mahon;A. Caramazza

  • Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction

    John Hart;Rita Sloan Berndt;Alfonso Caramazza

  • The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia.

    Alfonso Caramazza

  • Concepts and Categories: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Perspective

    Bradford Z. Mahon;Alfonso Caramazza

  • Naive beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: misconceptions about trajectories of objects ☆

    Alfonso Caramazza;Michael McCloskey;Bert Green

  • Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction

    A. Caramazza

Frequent Co-Authors

Bradford Z. Mahon
Bradford Z. Mahon Carnegie Mellon University
Yanchao Bi
Yanchao Bi Peking University
Gabriele Miceli
Gabriele Miceli University of Trento
Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
Marius V. Peelen
Marius V. Peelen Radboud University
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Rita Sloan Berndt
Rita Sloan Berndt University of Maryland, Baltimore
Brenda Rapp
Brenda Rapp Johns Hopkins University
Edgar Zurif
Edgar Zurif Brandeis University
Michele Miozzo
Michele Miozzo Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology doesn't stop in the classroom—many professionals choose online degrees to launch or advance their careers. Fields like Speech-Language Pathology (SLP) are popular pathways that blend psychology with communication sciences. These roles focus on diagnosing, treating, and preventing communication or swallowing disorders, and often require specific state certifications.

State-specific licensing is a key consideration. For example, those seeking Virginia speech pathologist certification requirements will need to meet detailed education and exam standards before practice. Similarly, if you’re interested in working elsewhere, it’s vital to understand the slp requirements in Washington and the steps to becoming a speech therapist in West Virginia or becoming a speech therapist in Wisconsin.

Online psychology and speech-language pathology programs offer flexibility, but always check state requirements before choosing a program. With the right degree and credentials, you’ll be prepared for rewarding roles supporting communication and cognitive health in a range of settings.

Best Scientists Citing Alfonso Caramazza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles