World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
94
Citations
28908
World Ranking
822
National Ranking
101

Neuroscience

D-Index
94
Citations
28438
World Ranking
955
National Ranking
108

Lorraine K. Tyler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine K. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lorraine K. Tyler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lorraine K. Tyler sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2006 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Lorraine K. Tyler is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

The scientist's work engages a variety of topics related to brain function and healthcare outcomes. Key research topics include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Lorraine K. Tyler's recent publications illustrate a focus on aging, brain function, and neurological health. Selected papers include:

  • "Noradrenergic-dependent functions are associated with age-related locus coeruleus signal intensity differences," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "The effects of age on resting-state BOLD signal variability is explained by cardiovascular and cerebrovascular factors," 2020, Psychophysiology
  • "Age-related reduction in motor adaptation: brain structural correlates and the role of explicit memory," 2020, Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Adjunct Digital Interventions Improve Opioid-Based Pain Management: Impact of Virtual Reality and Mobile Applications on Patient-Centered Pharmacy Care," 2022, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • "Cerebral blood flow predicts multiple demand network activity and fluid intelligence across the adult lifespan," 2022, Neurobiology of Aging

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lorraine K. Tyler include:

  • Kamen A. Tsvetanov
  • James B. Rowe
  • William D. Marslen-Wilson
  • Richard N. Henson
  • Rogier Kievit

The scholar's articles have appeared most frequently in venues such as:

  • American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • eLife
  • Nature Communications

In recognition of academic contributions, Lorraine K. Tyler was elected Member of Academia Europaea in 2006.

Best Publications

  • The temporal structure of spoken language understanding

    William Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine Komisarjevsky Tyler

  • Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.

    William Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K. Tyler;Rachelle Waksler;Lianne Older

  • Integrating Form and Meaning: A Distributed Model of Speech Perception.

    M. Gareth Gaskell;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) data repository: Structural and functional MRI, MEG, and cognitive data from a cross-sectional adult lifespan sample.

    Jason R. Taylor;Nitin Williams;Rhodri Cusack;Tibor Auer

  • The Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN) study protocol: a cross-sectional, lifespan, multidisciplinary examination of healthy cognitive ageing

    Meredith A Shafto;Lorraine K Tyler;Marie Dixon;Jason R Taylor;Jason R Taylor

  • Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study

    Kathleen Rastle;Matt H. Davis;William D. Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge

    Lorraine K. Tyler;Helen E. Moss

  • Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task.

    Joseph T. Devlin;Richard P. Russell;Matt H. Davis;Cathy J. Price

  • Accessing Different Types of Lexical Semantic Information: Evidence From Priming

    Helen E. Moss;Ruth K. Ostrin;Lorraine K. Tyler;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: a distributed account of category-specific deficits

    L.K. Tyler;H.E. Moss;M.R. Durrant-Peatfield;J.P. Levy

  • Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences.

    Ana Raposo;Helen E. Moss;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • The On-Line Effects of Semantic Context on Syntactic Processing

    Lorraine K. Tyler;William D. Marslen-Wilson

  • Language in the aging brain: the network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation.

    Meredith A. Shafto;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Rules, representations, and the English past tense

    William Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K Tyler

  • Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI

    Joseph T Devlin;Richard P Russell;Matthew H Davis;Cathy J Price

  • Dissociating types of mental computation

    William D. Marslen-Wilson;Lorraine K. Tyler

  • Processing Objects at Different Levels of Specificity

    L. K. Tyler;E. A. Stamatakis;P. Bright;K. Acres

  • The neural representation of nouns and verbs: PET studies.

    Lorraine K. Tyler;Richard Russell;Jalal Fadili;Helen E. Moss

  • Why Do Alzheimer Patients Have Difficulty with Pronouns? Working Memory, Semantics, and Reference in Comprehension and Production in Alzheimer's Disease ☆ ☆☆

    Amit Almor;Daniel Kempler;Maryellen C. MacDonald;Elaine S. Andersen

  • Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex

    Kirsten I. Taylor;Helen E. Moss;Emmanuel A. Stamatakis;Lorraine K. Tyler

Frequent Co-Authors

William D. Marslen-Wilson
William D. Marslen-Wilson University of Cambridge
Helen E. Moss
Helen E. Moss University of Cambridge
Emmanuel Stamatakis
Emmanuel Stamatakis University of Sydney
Kirsten I. Taylor
Kirsten I. Taylor Roche (Switzerland)
Richard N. Henson
Richard N. Henson MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit
James B. Rowe
James B. Rowe University of Cambridge
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge
Rhodri Cusack
Rhodri Cusack Trinity College Dublin
Jennifer M. Rodd
Jennifer M. Rodd University College London
Cathy J. Price
Cathy J. Price University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology continues to grow, many students explore related online degrees and specialized career pathways. Options such as counseling, clinical psychology, school psychology, and social work are among the most sought-after fields, offering flexibility and rewarding professional opportunities.

Prospective students can choose from a range of programs tailored to different interests and locations. For example, those looking for popular counseling degrees in Massachusetts will find diverse programs emphasizing both theoretical and hands-on experience. Similarly, students exploring the most popular counseling degree programs in Michigan can benefit from strong academic support and a variety of specialization options.

In New Jersey, it is possible to pursue popular counseling degrees in New Jersey that blend academic learning with practical placements, preparing graduates for state licensure and clinical work. Additionally, urban centers like Philadelphia offer access to popular counseling programs in Philadelphia, providing a broad range of online and campus-based courses.

Whether you plan to work in mental health, education, or research, pursuing an online psychology or counseling degree can be a flexible pathway to a meaningful career.

Best Scientists Citing Lorraine K. Tyler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles