World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Gina R. Kuperberg

Gina R. Kuperberg

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
65
Citations
15390
World Ranking
2843
National Ranking
1640

Gina R. Kuperberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina R. Kuperberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gina R. Kuperberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina R. Kuperberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award

Overview

Gina R. Kuperberg is affiliated with Harvard Medical School in the United States and focuses on research intersecting Neuroscience and Psychology. Their academic work spans multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's research primarily addresses topics in Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism, Reading and Literacy Development, Action Observation and Synchronization, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Language, Metaphor, and Cognition, as well as Topic Modeling.

Recent publications by Gina R. Kuperberg include:

  • "Word predictability effects are linear, not logarithmic: Implications for probabilistic models of sentence comprehension," 2020, Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Going the Extra Mile: Effects of Discourse Context on Two Late Positivities During Language Comprehension," 2020, Neurobiology of Language
  • "Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension," 2020, Topics in Cognitive Science
  • "Neural Evidence for the Prediction of Animacy Features during Language Comprehension: Evidence from MEG and EEG Representational Similarity Analysis," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "A predictive coding model of the N400," 2024, Cognition

Frequent coauthors with whom Gina R. Kuperberg has collaborated include:

  • Trevor Brothers
  • Lin Wang
  • Samer Nour Eddine
  • Victoria Sharpe
  • Lena Warnke

The most common publication venues for Kuperberg's work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cognition
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Journal of Memory and Language

Their published work encompasses a range of studies that contribute to understanding language comprehension, neural prediction mechanisms, and cognitive processing through multiple experimental and theoretical approaches.

Gina R. Kuperberg has been recognized with the Joseph Zubin Memorial Fund Award in 2010 for contributions related to their research field.

Best Publications

  • Regionally Localized Thinning of the Cerebral Cortex in Schizophrenia

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Matthew R. Broome;Philip K. McGuire;Anthony S. David

  • What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension

    Gina R. Kuperberg;T. Florian Jaeger

  • Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.

    Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences.

    Gina R Kuperberg;Tatiana Sitnikova;David Caplan;Phillip J Holcomb

  • Common and Distinct Neural Substrates for Pragmatic, Semantic, and Syntactic Processing of Spoken Sentences: An fMRI Study

    G. R. Kuperberg;P. K. McGuire;E. T. Bullmore;M. J. Brammer

  • Schizophrenia and cognitive function.

    Gina Kuperberg;Stephan Heckers

  • Language in Schizophrenia Part 1: An Introduction

    Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Dissociating n400 effects of prediction from association in single-word contexts

    Ellen F. Lau;Phillip J. Holcomb;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle: An Event-Related Potential Study on the Pragmatics of Negation

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Mante S. Nieuwland;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Phillip J. Holcomb;Tatiana Sitnikova;Douglas Greve

  • Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events

    Tatiana Sitnikova;Phillip J. Holcomb;Kristi A. Kiyonaga;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: evidence from event-related potentials.

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Donna A. Kreher;Tatiana Sitnikova;David N. Caplan

  • Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation.

    Tatiana Sitnikova;Gina Kuperberg;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • On the incrementality of pragmatic processing: An ERP investigation of informativeness and pragmatic abilities.

    Mante S. Nieuwland;Tali Ditman;Tali Ditman;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg

  • Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Balaji M. Lakshmanan;David N. Caplan;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • A Tale of Two Positivities and the N400: Distinct Neural Signatures Are Evoked by Confirmed and Violated Predictions at Different Levels of Representation.

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Gina R. Kuperberg;Edward W. Wlotko

  • Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event‐related fMRI study of relative clauses

    David Caplan;Sujith Vijayan;Gina Kuperberg;Caroline West

  • (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension

    Neil Cohn;Martin Paczynski;Ray Jackendoff;Phillip J. Holcomb

  • Reduced sensitivity to linguistic context in schizophrenic thought disorder: evidence from on-line monitoring for words in linguistically anomalous sentences.

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Philip K. McGuire;Anthony S. David

  • Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An erp study

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Martin Paczynski;Tali Ditman

  • Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences

    Gina R. Kuperberg;David Caplan;Tatiana Sitnikova;Marianna Eddy

Frequent Co-Authors

Phillip J. Holcomb
Phillip J. Holcomb San Diego State University
Donald C. Goff
Donald C. Goff New York University
Ray Jackendoff
Ray Jackendoff Tufts University
Matti Hämäläinen
Matti Hämäläinen Harvard Medical School
David Caplan
David Caplan Harvard University
Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Neil Cohn
Neil Cohn Tilburg University
Anthony S. David
Anthony S. David University College London
Douglas N. Greve
Douglas N. Greve Harvard University
Mante S. Nieuwland
Mante S. Nieuwland Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of fulfilling careers. Many students pursue counseling psychology career options, which focus on helping individuals manage emotional, mental, and behavioral challenges. These roles are in high demand, and graduates can work in schools, private practice, or community health settings.

Another popular pathway is therapy or counseling. These professionals work directly with clients to provide support, guidance, and treatment for a range of mental health concerns. Online psychology degrees often offer specialization in these areas.

The field continues to expand, with several roles listed among the fastest growing careers in psychology. Those with an interest in criminal justice and mental health may consider forensic psychology. According to the forensic psychologist outlook, opportunities are on the rise in court systems, law enforcement, and correctional facilities.

By choosing the right online degree and specialization, you can match your studies to evolving career opportunities in today’s psychology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Gina R. Kuperberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles