World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 119 576 548 346 326 315 61533
Psychology 119 263 226 167 141 304 63156
Neuroscience 119 392 351 232 205 304 63155

Marta Kutas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marta Kutas between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marta Kutas published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2010. 4 of the 326 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2010. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 2 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 10 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1973 2025

326 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marta Kutas: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 1
1975 2
1976 2
1977 3
1978 0
1979 0
1980 4
1981 0
1982 3
1983 5
1984 5
1985 1
1986 2
1987 10
1988 7
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 2
1993 7
1994 4
1995 10
1996 7
1997 11
1998 16
1999 14
2000 11
2001 7
2002 15
2003 9
2004 4
2005 11
2006 7
2007 15
2008 9
2009 6
2010 17
2011 9
2012 12
2013 8
2014 7
2015 9
2016 3
2017 7
2018 4
2019 5
2020 9
2021 2
2022 9
2023 2
2024 2
2025 2
Total 326
Download as CSV

Marta Kutas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marta Kutas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 304 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 304
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Marta Kutas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marta Kutas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22 119
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Marta Kutas is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with significant contributions to cognitive neuroscience. Additional areas of study include artificial intelligence, psychiatry and mental health, developmental and educational psychology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work covers several topics, notably:

  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Frequent co-authors in their publications include Lindsey Drayton, Rolf Van Der Sanden, Patrick Scheffmann, Ralph Adolphs, and Renée Baillargeon, each having collaborated on seven documented works.

Their recent papers reflect a focus on language comprehension, electrophysiological measures, and cognitive impairments. Selected publications include:

  • Comprehending surprising sentences: sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness (2020), Language Cognition and Neuroscience
  • An exploratory data analysis of word form prediction during word-by-word reading (2020), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The Role of Glutamate in Language and Language Disorders - Evidence from ERP and Pharmacologic Studies (2020), Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • To catch a Snitch: Brain potentials reveal variability in the functional organization of (fictional) world knowledge during reading (2020), Journal of Memory and Language
  • Event-related potential and EEG oscillatory predictors of verbal memory in mild cognitive impairment (2020), Brain Communications

Kutas has published extensively in journals including Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Journal of Memory and Language, Psychophysiology, Language Cognition and Neuroscience, and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. Trends in Cognitive Sciences is among the most frequent venues, hosting seven of their publications.

In recognition of scientific contributions, Marta Kutas was named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity

    Marta Kutas;Steven A. Hillyard

  • Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event related brain potential (ERP)

    Marta Kutas;Kara D. Federmeier

  • Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association

    Marta Kutas;Steven A. Hillyard

  • Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension

    Marta Kutas;Kara D. Federmeier

  • Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time

    Marta Kutas;Gregory McCarthy;Emanuel Donchin

  • Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

    Katherine A DeLong;Thomas P Urbach;Marta Kutas

  • Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review.

    David M. Groppe;Thomas P. Urbach;Marta Kutas

  • A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing

    Kara D. Federmeier;Marta Kutas

  • Expect the unexpected : event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations

    Seana Coulson;Jonathan W. King;Marta Kutas

  • Electrophysiology of cognitive processing.

    Steven A. Hillyard;Marta Kutas

  • Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.

    Marta Kutas;Steven A. Hillyard

  • Event-related brain potentials to grammatical errors and semantic anomalies

    Marta Kutas;Steven A. Hillyard

  • Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials.

    C Van Petten;M Kutas

  • Who did what and when? using word-and clause-level erps to monitor working memory usage in reading

    Jonathan W. King;Marta Kutas

  • Automatic removal of eye movement and blink artifacts from EEG data using blind component separation

    Carrie A. Joyce;Irina F. Gorodnitsky;Marta Kutas

  • Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

    Ken A. Paller;Marta Kutas;Andrew R. Mayes

  • Bridging the gap: Evidence from erps on the processing of unbounded dependencies

    Robert Kluender;Marta Kutas

  • Anticipating Words and Their Gender: An Event-related Brain Potential Study of Semantic Integration, Gender Expectancy, and Gender Agreement in Spanish Sentence Reading

    Nicole Y.Y. Wicha;Eva M. Moreno;Marta Kutas

  • Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005)

    Marta Kutas;Cyma K. Van Petten;Robert Kluender

  • Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing.

    Kara D. Federmeier;Edward W. Wlotko;Esmeralda De Ochoa-Dewald;Marta Kutas

  • Subjacency as a processing phenomenon

    Robert Kluender;Marta Kutas

Frequent Co-Authors

Kara D. Federmeier
Kara D. Federmeier University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
John M Olichney
John M Olichney University of California, Davis
Vicente J. Iragui
Vicente J. Iragui University of California, San Diego
David P. Salmon
David P. Salmon University of California, San Diego
Steven A. Hillyard
Steven A. Hillyard University of California, San Diego
Cyma Van Petten
Cyma Van Petten Binghamton University
Emanuel Donchin
Emanuel Donchin University of South Florida
Thomas F. Münte
Thomas F. Münte University of Lübeck
Seana Coulson
Seana Coulson University of California, San Diego
Jeffrey L. Elman
Jeffrey L. Elman University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degree programs is a flexible and cost-effective option for many students across the United States. Online programs allow learners to balance their studies with work and family commitments, making education more accessible than ever. For those concerned about tuition costs, researching most affordable online bachelor's in psychology degree programs in the South can help identify budget-friendly options without sacrificing quality.

Many regions offer competitive online psychology programs with affordable tuition. For example, students in Missouri can take advantage of the St. Louis cheapest online psychology bachelor's degree options, while those in Georgia can review the most affordable online psychology degree programs in Georgia to find the best fit for their needs.

Similarly, many affordable programs are available in Illinois, as outlined by most affordable online psychology degree programs in Illinois. Graduates from these programs are well-prepared for diverse career pathways, including counseling, social work, human resources, and research roles. Choosing a cost-effective program can pave the way for a rewarding and flexible career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Marta Kutas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles