World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
14399
World Ranking
4496
National Ranking
2102

Cormac Flanagan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cormac Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Cormac Flanagan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cormac Flanagan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - ACM Fellow For contributions to static and dynamic program debugging and verification methods
  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Cormac Flanagan is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, prominently including Physics and Astronomy as well as Computer Science.

The scientist's work covers a range of subfields such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Their research topics further focus on Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena, Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena, Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies, Formal Methods in Verification, Logic, programming, and type systems, and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge.

Among the recent publications by Cormac Flanagan are:

  • A sensitive search for water masers associated with star formation regions in the Local Group Galaxy NGC 6822, 2022, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
  • Mover Logic: A Concurrent Program Logic for Reduction and Rely-Guarantee Reasoning, 2024, Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include:

  • S. P. Ellingsen
  • Andrew A. Cole
  • Stephen N. Freund

Consistent with these collaborations, the main publication venues for their work include:

  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)

Cormac Flanagan has been recognized by professional societies with awards such as the ACM Fellow designation in 2020 for contributions to static and dynamic program debugging and verification methods. Earlier distinctions include the ACM Senior Member status awarded in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Extended static checking for Java

    Cormac Flanagan;K. Rustan M. Leino;Mark Lillibridge;Greg Nelson

  • FastTrack: efficient and precise dynamic race detection

    Cormac Flanagan;Stephen N. Freund

  • Dynamic partial-order reduction for model checking software

    Cormac Flanagan;Patrice Godefroid

  • The essence of compiling with continuations

    Cormac Flanagan;Amr Sabry;Bruce F. Duba;Matthias Felleisen

  • Atomizer: A dynamic atomicity checker for multithreaded programs

    Cormac Flanagan;Stephen N. Freund

  • Type-based race detection for Java

    Cormac Flanagan;Stephen N. Freund

  • Houdini, an Annotation Assistant for ESC/Java

    Cormac Flanagan;K. Rustan M. Leino

  • A type and effect system for atomicity

    Cormac Flanagan;Shaz Qadeer

  • Predicate abstraction for software verification

    Cormac Flanagan;Shaz Qadeer

  • DrScheme: a programming environment for Scheme

    Robert Bruce Findler;John Clements;Cormac Flanagan;Matthew Flatt

  • Hybrid type checking

    Cormac Flanagan

  • Avoiding exponential explosion: generating compact verification conditions

    Cormac Flanagan;James B. Saxe

  • Efficient purely-dynamic information flow analysis

    Thomas H. Austin;Cormac Flanagan

  • Types for safe locking: Static race detection for Java

    Martin Abadi;Cormac Flanagan;Stephen N. Freund

  • Space-Efficient Gradual Typing.

    David Herman;Aaron Tomb;Cormac Flanagan

  • Multiple facets for dynamic information flow

    Thomas H. Austin;Cormac Flanagan

  • Thread-modular model checking

    Cormac Flanagan;Shaz Qadeer

  • Types for Safe Locking

    Cormac Flanagan;Martín Abadi

  • Velodrome: a sound and complete dynamic atomicity checker for multithreaded programs

    Cormac Flanagan;Stephen N. Freund;Jaeheon Yi

  • Componential set-based analysis

    Cormac Flanagan;Matthias Felleisen

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Felleisen
Matthias Felleisen Northeastern University
Shaz Qadeer
Shaz Qadeer Microsoft (United States)
Martín Abadi
Martín Abadi Google (United States)
K. Rustan M. Leino
K. Rustan M. Leino Amazon Web Services
Matthew Flatt
Matthew Flatt University of Utah
Shriram Krishnamurthi
Shriram Krishnamurthi Brown University
Mooly Sagiv
Mooly Sagiv Tel Aviv University
Mark Lillibridge
Mark Lillibridge Meta Platforms, Inc.
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up flexible options for advancing your tech career in the USA. For those interested in engineering, there are a variety of online electrical engineering courses USA that can complement or broaden your computer science expertise.

If you want a faster entry into the workforce, consider pursuing certifications for jobs. These credentials are designed to be completed quickly, providing specialized skills that are highly valued by employers.

Many students also seek graduate degrees that fit a tight schedule. The fastest masters degree online programs can help you boost your qualifications without putting your life on hold. Additionally, choosing from the most in demand masters degrees will keep your skills relevant in a competitive job market.

Connecting these pathways with your computer science studies empowers you to build a resilient, future-oriented career in technology.

Best Scientists Citing Cormac Flanagan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles