World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6386
World Ranking
9340
National Ranking
3966

Shuvendu K. Lahiri publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shuvendu K. Lahiri sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 142 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Shuvendu K. Lahiri D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shuvendu K. Lahiri sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shuvendu K. Lahiri is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and has a prolific body of work within computer science, with a primary focus on software-related research. Their academic contributions cover a broad range of topics within software engineering, verification, and system reliability.

Their recent publications include:

  • Interactive Code Generation via Test-Driven User-Intent Formalization, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • LLM-Based Test-Driven Interactive Code Generation: User Study and Empirical Evaluation, 2024, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • TOGA, 2022, Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering
  • DeepMerge: Learning to Merge Programs, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • SolType: refinement types for arithmetic overflow in solidity, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lahiri include:

  • Akash Lal
  • Saikat Chakraborty
  • Sarah Fakhoury
  • Narges Shadab
  • Pritam Gharat

Lahiri's research has consistently appeared in the following publication venues:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages
  • IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering

The scientist has contributed to academic literature through a book publication titled Computer Aided Verification released by Springer Science+Business Media in 2020.

The key fields of study represented in their work are:

  • Computer Science

More specialized subfields within computer science in their research include:

  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture

Lahiri's main research topics focus on software testing, debugging, and engineering, including:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques

Best Publications

  • Feedback-Directed Random Test Generation

    Carlos Pacheco;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Michael D. Ernst;Thomas Ball

  • Modeling and verifying systems using a logic of Counter arithmetic with Lambda Expressions and Uninterpreted Functions

    Randal E. Bryant;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • SYMDIFF: a language-agnostic semantic diff tool for imperative programs

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Chris Hawblitzel;Ming Kawaguchi;Henrique Rebêlo

  • CodaMosa: Escaping Coverage Plateaus in Test Generation with Pre-trained Large Language Models

    Unknown

  • Back to the future: revisiting precise program verification using SMT solvers

    Shuvendu Lahiri;Shaz Qadeer

  • A solver for reachability modulo theories

    Akash Lal;Shaz Qadeer;Shuvendu K. Lahiri

  • SMT techniques for fast predicate abstraction

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Robert Nieuwenhuis;Albert Oliveras

  • A symbolic approach to predicate abstraction

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Randal E. Bryant;Byron Cook

  • Differential assertion checking

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Kenneth L. McMillan;Rahul Sharma;Chris Hawblitzel

  • Verifying properties of well-founded linked lists

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Shaz Qadeer

  • Finding errors in .net with feedback-directed random testing

    Carlos Pacheco;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Thomas Ball

  • Modeling and Verification of Out-of-Order Microprocessors in UCLID

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Sanjit A. Seshia;Randal E. Bryant

  • Helping developers help themselves: automatic decomposition of code review changesets

    Mike Barnett;Christian Bird;Joao Brunet;Shuvendu K. Lahiri

  • Constructing Quantified Invariants via Predicate Abstraction

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Randal E. Bryant

  • A reachability predicate for analyzing low-level software

    Shaunak Chatterjee;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Shaz Qadeer;Zvonimir Rakamaric

  • A hybrid SAT-based decision procedure for separation logic with uninterpreted functions

    Sanjit A. Seshia;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Randal E. Bryant

  • Indexed Predicate Discovery for Unbounded System Verification

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Randal E. Bryant

  • The UCLID Decision Procedure

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Sanjit A. Seshia

  • Code vectors: understanding programs through embedded abstracted symbolic traces

    Jordan Henkel;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Ben Liblit;Thomas Reps

  • An efficient decision procedure for UTVPI constraints

    Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Madanlal Musuvathi

  • Zapato: Automatic Theorem Proving for Predicate Abstraction Refinement

    Thomas Ball;Byron Cook;Shuvendu K. Lahiri;Lintao Zhang

  • Corral: A Solver for Reachability Modulo Theories

    Akash Lal;Shaz Qadeer;Shuvendu K. Lahiri

Frequent Co-Authors

Randal E. Bryant
Randal E. Bryant Carnegie Mellon University
Shaz Qadeer
Shaz Qadeer Microsoft (United States)
Thomas Ball
Thomas Ball Microsoft (United States)
Isil Dillig
Isil Dillig The University of Texas at Austin
Christian Bird
Christian Bird Microsoft (United States)
Thomas Reps
Thomas Reps University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madanlal Musuvathi
Madanlal Musuvathi Microsoft (United States)
Byron Cook
Byron Cook Amazon (United States)
Sanjit A. Seshia
Sanjit A. Seshia University of California, Berkeley
Chao Wang
Chao Wang University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a wide range of pathways, from rapid certifications to advanced online degrees. For those looking to enter the workforce quickly, there are quick certifications that pay well in areas like IT support, networking, and cybersecurity. These can often be completed in a few months and serve as launching points for tech careers.

If you're considering more advanced credentials, you might explore the shortest masters degree programs online. Accelerated online master's degrees allow students to upskill or transition to new specialties in 12–18 months, ideal for working professionals.

Choosing the right graduate program is important. Research shows that which master's degree is most in demand in USA continues to include computer science, data science, and information technology—fields with strong job growth and salary potential.

Alternatively, those seeking a shorter college commitment can consider 2 year online degrees. Online associate degrees offer foundational knowledge and can lead to entry-level roles or serve as a step toward a bachelor’s.

Best Scientists Citing Shuvendu K. Lahiri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles