World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7683
World Ranking
8364
National Ranking
3585

Alex Groce publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Groce sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 176 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alex Groce D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Groce sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Alex Groce is affiliated with Northern Arizona University in the United States and specializes in computer science with a focus on software-related research. Their work predominantly spans software testing and debugging techniques, software engineering research, and advanced malware detection techniques.

Their recent publications cover various topics and have appeared in several recognized academic venues. Notable papers include:

  • SMARTIAN: Enhancing Smart Contract Fuzzing with Static and Dynamic Data-Flow Analyses, 2021, 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • Using Relative Lines of Code to Guide Automated Test Generation for Python, 2020, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Evaluating and Improving Static Analysis Tools Via Differential Mutation Analysis, 2021, 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)
  • Using mutants to help developers distinguish and debug (compiler) faults, 2020, Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • What are the Actual Flaws in Important Smart Contracts (And How Can We Find Them)?, 2020, Lecture notes in computer science

Alex Groce has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Gustavo Grieco, Josselin Feist, Kush Jain, Claire Le Goues, and Josie Holmes. These collaborations have contributed to a diverse range of publications.

The primary publication venues where Groce's work appears include:

  • ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • 2021 IEEE 21st International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (QRS)

Their research fields are centered on computer science, with subfields addressing software, information systems, signal processing, computer networks and communications, and artificial intelligence.

Topics addressed within their research include:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Teaching and Learning Programming

Alex Groce was recognized as an ACM Senior Member in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Slither: A Static Analysis Framework For Smart Contracts

    Josselin Feist;Gustavo Grieco;Alex Groce

  • Modular verification of software components in C

    S. Chaki;E.M. Clarke;A. Groce;S. Jha

  • Slither: a static analysis framework for smart contracts

    Josselin Feist;Gustavo Greico;Alex Groce

  • Manticore: a user-friendly symbolic execution framework for binaries and smart contracts

    Mark Mossberg;Felipe Manzano;Eric Hennenfent;Alex Groce

  • What went wrong: explaining counterexamples

    Alex Groce;Willem Visser

  • Error explanation with distance metrics

    Alex Groce;Sagar Chaki;Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

  • Modular verification of software components in C

    Sagar Chaki;Edmund Clarke;Alex Groce;Somesh Jha

  • Code coverage for suite evaluation by developers

    Rahul Gopinath;Carlos Jensen;Alex Groce

  • SMARTIAN: Enhancing Smart Contract Fuzzing with Static and Dynamic Data-Flow Analyses

    Unknown

  • Echidna: effective, usable, and fast fuzzing for smart contracts

    Gustavo Grieco;Will Song;Artur Cygan;Josselin Feist

  • Taming compiler fuzzers

    Yang Chen;Alex Groce;Chaoqiang Zhang;Weng-Keen Wong

  • Adaptive Model Checking

    Alex Groce;Doron Peled;Mihalis Yannakakis

  • Randomized Differential Testing as a Prelude to Formal Verification

    Alex Groce;Gerard Holzmann;Rajeev Joshi

  • Comparing non-adequate test suites using coverage criteria

    Milos Gligoric;Alex Groce;Chaoqiang Zhang;Rohan Sharma

  • Heuristics for model checking Java programs

    Alex Groce;Willem Visser

  • Error Explanation with Distance Metrics

    Alex Groce

  • Model checking Java programs using structural heuristics

    Alex Groce;Willem Visser

  • Swarm testing

    Alex Groce;Chaoqiang Zhang;Eric Eide;Yang Chen

  • Formal Analysis of Log Files

    Howard Barringer;Alex Groce;Klaus Havelund;Margaret H. Smith

  • Swarm Verification Techniques

    G. J. Holzmann;R. Joshi;A. Groce

  • SPECIAL S ECTION O N T OOLS A ND A LGORITHMS F OR THE C ONSTRUCTION A ND A NALYSIS O F S YSTEMS

    Alex Groce;Sagar Chaki;Daniel Kroening;Ofer Strichman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerard J. Holzmann
Gerard J. Holzmann Nimble Research
Klaus Havelund
Klaus Havelund Jet Propulsion Lab
Daniel Kroening
Daniel Kroening Amazon (United States)
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Howard Barringer
Howard Barringer University of Manchester
Weng-Keen Wong
Weng-Keen Wong Oregon State University
John Regehr
John Regehr University of Utah
Willem Visser
Willem Visser Amazon (United States)
Ofer Strichman
Ofer Strichman Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Sagar Chaki
Sagar Chaki Siemens (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree in the USA can open doors to many related online programs and diverse career pathways. With technology evolving rapidly, specialized degrees are more accessible and flexible than ever before.

For those interested in the intersection of data and technology, several top data science programs offer affordable and rigorous online coursework. Data science graduates are highly sought after across multiple industries, from tech to healthcare.

If you’re drawn to managing projects and people in a fast-paced environment, the construction sector offers vital roles. Consider enrolling in a construction management accelerated degree for quick entry into this growing field.

Furthermore, an mba online cheap can complement a technical background, equipping you with essential business leadership and management skills.

For those looking for a quicker path, explore online masters that can be completed in as little as one year. These accelerated pathways can help you fast-track your career and boost your earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing Alex Groce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles