World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
58
Citations
12859
World Ranking
3643
National Ranking
1743

Corina S. Pasareanu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corina S. Pasareanu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 240 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Corina S. Pasareanu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Corina S. Pasareanu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Corina S. Pasareanu is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on specialized subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, and Computer Networks and Communications.

The scientist's research topics cover a wide range of areas, prominently featuring:

  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Pasareanu has contributed to numerous papers in various respected publication venues. Frequent venues of publication include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • Formal Aspects of Computing

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Pasareanu consist of:

  • "Parallelization Techniques for Verifying Neural Networks," 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Parallelization Techniques for Verifying Neural Networks," 2020, reposiTUm (TU Wien)
  • "On using distributed representations of source code for the detection of C security vulnerabilities," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation (ICST 2020)," 2022, Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • "Controller Synthesis for Autonomous Systems With Deep-Learning Perception Components," 2024, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering

Co-authors frequently collaborating with Pasareanu include:

  • Ravi Mangal
  • Divya Gopinath
  • Youcheng Sun
  • Radu Călinescu
  • Matt Fredrikson

Pasareanu's work also extends to book publications, primarily through Springer Science+Business Media and Morgan & Claypool Publishers. Their contributions in this area include:

  • "Software Engineering and Formal Methods," 2021
  • "NASA Formal Methods," 2022
  • "Theoretical Aspects of Computing - ICTAC 2022," 2022
  • "Symbolic Execution and Quantitative Reasoning," 2020

Among professional recognitions, Pasareanu received the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Bandera: extracting finite-state models from Java source code

    James C. Corbett;Matthew B. Dwyer;John Hatcliff;Shawn Laubach

  • Generalized symbolic execution for model checking and testing

    Sarfraz Khurshid;Corina S. Păsăreanu;Willem Visser

  • Test input generation with java PathFinder

    Willem Visser;Corina S. Pǎsǎreanu;Sarfraz Khurshid

  • Learning assumptions for compositional verification

    Jamieson M. Cobleigh;Dimitra Giannakopoulou;Corina S. Păsăreanu

  • Symbolic execution for software testing in practice: preliminary assessment

    Cristian Cadar;Patrice Godefroid;Sarfraz Khurshid;Corina S. Pasareanu

  • JPF-SE: a symbolic execution extension to Java PathFinder

    Saswat Anand;Corina S. Păsăreanu;Willem Visser

  • Differential symbolic execution

    Suzette Person;Matthew B. Dwyer;Sebastian Elbaum;Corina S. Pǎsǎreanu

  • Symbolic PathFinder: symbolic execution of Java bytecode

    Corina S. Păsăreanu;Neha Rungta

  • A survey of new trends in symbolic execution for software testing and analysis

    Corina S. Pasareanu;Willem Visser

  • Combining unit-level symbolic execution and system-level concrete execution for testing nasa software

    Unknown

  • Assumption generation for software component verification

    D. Giannakopoulou;C.S. Pasareanu;H. Barringer

  • Symbolic PathFinder: integrating symbolic execution with model checking for Java bytecode analysis

    Corina S. Pasareanu;Willem Visser;David H. Bushnell;Jaco Geldenhuys

  • Testing android apps through symbolic execution

    Nariman Mirzaei;Sam Malek;Corina S. Păsăreanu;Naeem Esfahani

  • Test input generation for java containers using state matching

    Willem Visser;Corina S. Pǎsǎreanu;Radek Pelánek

  • Tool-supported program abstraction for finite-state verification

    Matthew B. Dwyer;John Hatcliff;Roby Joehanes;Shawn Laubach

  • Automated Assume-Guarantee Reasoning by Abstraction Refinement

    Mihaela Gheorghiu Bobaru;Corina S. Păsăreanu;Dimitra Giannakopoulou

  • Verification of Java Programs Using Symbolic Execution and Invariant Generation

    Corina S. Păsăreanu;Willem Visser

  • Learning to divide and conquer: applying the L* algorithm to automate assume-guarantee reasoning

    Corina S. Păsăreanu;Dimitra Giannakopoulou;Mihaela Gheorghiu Bobaru;Jamieson M. Cobleigh

  • Parallel symbolic execution for structural test generation

    Unknown

  • Reliability analysis in symbolic pathfinder

    Antonio Filieri;Corina S. Pasareanu;Willem Visser

  • Assume-Guarantee Model Checking of Software: A Comparative Case Study

    Corina S. Pasareanu;Matthew B. Dwyer;Michael Huth

  • Combining test case generation and runtime verification

    Cyrille Artho;Howard Barringer;Allen Goldberg;Klaus Havelund

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem Visser
Willem Visser Amazon (United States)
Sarfraz Khurshid
Sarfraz Khurshid The University of Texas at Austin
Matthew B. Dwyer
Matthew B. Dwyer University of Virginia
Howard Barringer
Howard Barringer University of Manchester
Clark Barrett
Clark Barrett Stanford University
Koushik Sen
Koushik Sen University of California, Berkeley
Gabor Karsai
Gabor Karsai Vanderbilt University
Edmund M. Clarke
Edmund M. Clarke Carnegie Mellon University
Tevfik Bultan
Tevfik Bultan University of California, Santa Barbara
Klaus Havelund
Klaus Havelund Jet Propulsion Lab

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens the door to several related online degrees and career pathways across STEM fields. Many students choose to supplement their knowledge with specialized programs in engineering, physics, or data science, all of which benefit from a strong computing background.

For example, those interested in sustainability might consider an environmental engineering degree, where computational modeling plays a major role. Mechanical engineering is another attractive field, with many curious about the mechanical engineering degree cost for affordable pathways to this versatile discipline.

Physics is increasingly taught online. An online physics bachelor's degree provides a strong foundation in analytical thinking, making it a powerful complement to Computer Science. Additionally, the surge in big data has led to a high demand for professionals with an affordable data science degree, often pursued online for both convenience and cost savings.

Exploring these related degrees alongside Computer Science can significantly broaden career prospects in the evolving technology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Corina S. Pasareanu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles