World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernhard Steffen

Bernhard Steffen

Award Badge
Computer Science
Germany
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
73
Citations
15910
World Ranking
1622
National Ranking
65

Bernhard Steffen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Steffen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 386 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bernhard Steffen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernhard Steffen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Bernhard Steffen is primarily affiliated with TU Dortmund University in Germany. Their research work spans various aspects of computer science, focusing particularly on artificial intelligence, software, computational theory and mathematics, information systems, and computer networks and communications.

The main fields of study for Bernhard Steffen encompass:

  • Computer Science

Their work includes significant contributions to subfields such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Bernhard Steffen's research topics cover a wide range of areas, including:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Formal Methods in Verification
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Software Engineering Research

Recent published papers by Bernhard Steffen include:

  • Microscopic insights into pedestrian motion through a bottleneck, resolving spatial and temporal variations, 2022, Collective Dynamics
  • Algebraic aggregation of random forests: towards explainability and rapid evaluation, 2021, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • The molecular composition of extractable soil microbial compounds and their contribution to soil organic matter vary with soil depth and tree species, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Towards Explainability in Machine Learning: The Formal Methods Way, 2020, IT Professional
  • The RERS challenge: towards controllable and scalable benchmark synthesis, 2021, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bernhard Steffen include:

  • Tiziana Margaria
  • Alexander Bainczyk
  • Daniel Busch
  • Tim Tegeler
  • Alnis Murtovi

Bernhard Steffen has published extensively in several venues, with frequent publications found in:

  • International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IT Professional
  • Collective Dynamics
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Their book publications are primarily associated with Springer Science+Business Media, including titles such as:

  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation (2021)
  • Bridging the Gap Between AI and Reality (2023)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Practice (2022)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Engineering Principles (2020)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Verification Principles (2020)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Tools and Trends (2021)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation: Applications (2020)
  • Variable Neighborhood Search (2020)
  • Information Security and Cryptology - ICISC 2019 (2020)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Verification Principles (2022)
  • Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Cultural Heritage, Tourism, Autonomous Vehicles, and Intelligent Agents (2021)
  • Cross-Cultural Design. Applications in Arts, Learning, Well-being, and Social Development (2021)
  • Model Checking, Synthesis, and Learning (2021)
  • Leveraging Applications of Formal Methods, Verification and Validation. Adaptation and Learning (2022)
  • Information Security and Cryptology (2021)

Additionally, Bernhard Steffen contributed to a publication by Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique titled Real Time and Such: Essays Dedicated to Wang Yi to Celebrate His Scientific Career (2024).

Best Publications

  • The concurrency workbench: a semantics-based tool for the verification of concurrent systems

    Rance Cleaveland;Joachim Parrow;Bernhard Steffen

  • Reactive, generative, and stratified models of probabilistic processes

    Rob J. VanGlabbeek;Scott A. Smolka;Bernhard Steffen

  • Reactive, generative, and stratified models of probabilistic processes

    R. van Glabbeek;S.A. Smolka;B. Steffen;C.M.N. Tofts

  • Lazy code motion

    Jens Knoop;Oliver Rüthing;Bernhard Steffen

  • A linear-time model-checking algorithm for the alternation-free modal mu-calculus

    Rance Cleaveland;Bernhard Steffen

  • Optimal code motion: theory and practice

    Jens Knoop;Oliver Rüthing;Bernhard Steffen

  • The Concurrency Workbench

    Rance Cleaveland;Joachim Parrow;Bernhard Steffen

  • Verification on Infinite Structures

    Olaf Burkart;Didier Caucal;Faron Moller;Bernhard Steffen

  • Partial dead code elimination

    Jens Knoop;Oliver Rüthing;Bernhard Steffen

  • Model-driven development with the jABC

    Bernhard Steffen;Tiziana Margaria;Ralf Nagel;Sven Jörges

  • The TTT Algorithm: A Redundancy-Free Approach to Active Automata Learning

    Malte Isberner;Falk Howar;Bernhard Steffen

  • Data Flow Analysis as Model Checking

    Bernhard Steffen

  • Model-Checking: A Tutorial Introduction

    Markus Müller-Olm;David A. Schmidt;Bernhard Steffen

  • The Interprocedural Coincidence Theorem

    Jens Knoop;Bernhard Steffen

  • The Open-Source LearnLib

    Malte Isberner;Falk Howar;Bernhard Steffen

  • Program Analysis as Model Checking of Abstract Interpretations

    David A. Schmidt;Bernhard Steffen

  • LearnLib: a library for automata learning and experimentation

    Harald Raffelt;Bernhard Steffen;Therese Berg

  • Introduction to Active Automata Learning from a Practical Perspective

    Bernhard Steffen;Falk Howar;Maik Merten

  • Model Checking for Context-Free Processes

    Olaf Burkart;Bernhard Steffen

  • Faster Model Checking for the Modal Mu-Calculus

    Rance Cleaveland;Marion Klein;Bernhard Steffen

  • Compositional Minimization of Finite State Systems

    Susanne Graf;Bernhard Steffen

  • Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

    Hendrik Brinksma;W.R. Cleaveland;T. Margaria;B. Steffen

  • Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems : 25 Years of TACAS: TOOLympics, Held as Part of ETAPS 2019, Prague, Czech Republic, April 6-11, 2019, Proceedings, Part III

    Dirk Beyer;Marieke Huisman;Fabrice Kordon;Bernhard Steffen

  • Reactive, generative, and stratified models of probabilistic processes

    R.J. vanGlabbeek;S.A. Smolka;B. Steffen;C.M.N. Tofts

Frequent Co-Authors

Tiziana Margaria
Tiziana Margaria University of Limerick
Bengt Jonsson
Bengt Jonsson Uppsala University
Rance Cleaveland
Rance Cleaveland University of Maryland, College Park
Kim Guldstrand Larsen
Kim Guldstrand Larsen Aalborg University
Scott A. Smolka
Scott A. Smolka Stony Brook University
Dirk Beyer
Dirk Beyer Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Antonia Bertolino
Antonia Bertolino National Research Council (CNR)
Axel Legay
Axel Legay Université Catholique de Louvain
Valérie Issarny
Valérie Issarny French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and dynamic career pathways. Many students consider parallel or complementary fields such as data science or accounting to diversify their expertise and career prospects.

Often, affordability is a major concern for students. It’s important to compare the cost of criminal justice degree programs and other fields to find the best fit for your budget and goals. Online programs can reduce expenses while still providing quality education.

Graduates interested in financial management may look into an online accounting degree, which complements the analytical skills developed in computer science. Those aiming for tech-advanced careers might consider the top data science programs available online, which blend coding, analytics, and business intelligence.

Another emerging industry is construction management. If you are interested in applying your tech skills to real-world projects, a construction management degree online provides a path into this fast-growing sector.

By exploring these online degree options, you can tailor your education to fit your interests—broadening your career possibilities beyond traditional computer science roles.

Best Scientists Citing Bernhard Steffen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles