World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mike Hinchey

Mike Hinchey

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
8454
World Ranking
7944
National Ranking
27

Mike Hinchey publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Hinchey sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 389 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mike Hinchey D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Hinchey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Hinchey is affiliated with Lero in Ireland. Their research contributions span several fields, including artificial intelligence, management information systems, information systems, media technology, and computer science applications.

Their work addresses multiple topics such as teaching and learning programming, gender and technology in education, innovative teaching and learning methods, spectroscopy and chemometric analyses, identification and quantification in food, water quality monitoring technologies, and IoT and edge/fog computing.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mike Hinchey include Deborah Silver, Joaquim Jorge, Rick Kazman, Carolyn McGregor, and Megha Ben.

Mike Hinchey has published research papers across various venues. Notable publication venues include Computer with five papers, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering with two papers, Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Applied Soft Computing, and IEEE Pervasive Computing.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mike Hinchey include:

  • Guest Editorial: Intelligence for systems and software engineering, 2023, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering

Other recent papers from their broader collaboration network feature titles such as:

  • Applications of computational intelligence techniques to software engineering problems, 2021, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
  • A study of high school computer science teacher confidence levels, 2020, Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education
  • A multi-objective cuckoo search algorithm using generalized Lèvy flight and dissimilar egg identification for multispectral image thresholding, 2025, Applied Soft Computing
  • IEEE Computer Society Election, 2020, Computer

In addition to journal articles, Mike Hinchey has contributed to book publications with Springer Nature. These include:

  • Applications of Networks, Sensors and Autonomous Systems Analytics, 2021
  • Innovations in Signal Processing and Embedded Systems, 2022

Best Publications

  • Dynamic Software Product Lines

    S. Hallsteinsen;M. Hinchey;Sooyong Park;K. Schmid

  • Seven more myths of formal methods

    J.P. Bowen;M.G. Hinchey

  • Ten commandments of formal methods

    J.P. Bowen;M.G. Hinchey

  • Applications of Formal Methods

    Jonathan P. Bowen;Michael G. Hinchey

  • Swarms and Swarm Intelligence

    M.G. Hinchey;R. Sterritt;C. Rouff

  • An overview of Dynamic Software Product Line architectures and techniques: Observations from research and industry

    Rafael Capilla;Jan Bosch;Pablo Trinidad;Antonio Ruiz-Cortés

  • Fulfilling the Vision of Autonomic Computing

    S. Dobson;R. Sterritt;P. Nixon;M. Hinchey

  • NASA's swarm missions: the challenge of building autonomous software

    W. Truszkowski;M. Hinchey;J. Rash;C. Rouff

  • An Invitation to Formal Methods

    J.P. Bowen;R.W. Butler;D.L. Dill;R.L. Glass

  • Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems

    Michael G. Hinchey;James L. Rash;Walter F. Truszkowski;Christopher Rouff

  • Autonomous and autonomic systems: a paradigm for future space exploration missions

    W.F. Truszkowski;M.G. Hinchey;J.L. Rash;C.A. Rouff

  • Ten Commandments of Formal Methods ...Ten Years Later

    J.P. Bowen;M.G. Hinchey

  • Building Dynamic Software Product Lines

    M. Hinchey;Sooyong Park;K. Schmid

  • Understanding Formal Methods

    Jean Francois Monin;Michael G. Hinchey

  • Self-managing software

    M.G. Hinchey;R. Sterritt

  • Provably Correct Systems

    He Jifeng;C. A. R. Hoare;Martin Fränzle;Markus Müller-Olm

  • Formal Versus Agile: Survival of the Fittest

    S. Black;P.P. Boca;J.P. Bowen;J. Gorman

  • Concurrent Systems: Formal Development in CSP

    Michael G. Hinchey;Stephen A. Jarvis

  • Autonomous and Autonomic Systems: With Applications to NASA Intelligent Spacecraft Operations and Exploration Systems

    Walt Truszkowski;Harold Hallock;Christopher Rouff;Jay Karlin

  • ZUM '97: The Z Formal Specification Notation

    Jonathan P. Bowen;Michael G. Hinchey;David Till

  • Dynamic Software Product Lines

    Michael Hinchey;Sooyong Park;Klaus Schmid;Svein Hallsteinsen

  • Proceedings of the 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference: APSEC 2017

    Jian Lv;He Zhang;Mike Hinchey;Xiao Liu

  • Seven more myths of formal methods: Dispelling industrial prejudices

    Jonathan P. Bowen;Michael G. Hinchey

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan P. Bowen
Jonathan P. Bowen London South Bank University
Tiziana Margaria
Tiziana Margaria University of Limerick
Antonio Ruiz-Cortés
Antonio Ruiz-Cortés University of Seville
Hartmut Schmeck
Hartmut Schmeck Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Bernhard Steffen
Bernhard Steffen TU Dortmund University
Michael Butler
Michael Butler University of Southampton
Jon Timmis
Jon Timmis University of Sunderland
Jan Bosch
Jan Bosch Chalmers University of Technology
Yuanshun Dai
Yuanshun Dai University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Simon Dobson
Simon Dobson University of St Andrews

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related degrees can open new doors in technology and science. Alongside computer science, fields such as engineering and physics offer exciting career opportunities—many now accessible through online study options.

A computer science degree online provides a flexible path to in-demand tech skills. For those interested in environmental innovation, pursuing an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering can lead to impactful roles in sustainability.

Engineering-minded students might consider a mechanical engineering degree online cost to compare affordability and program options. If physics is your passion, you may be surprised to learn that you can you get a physics degree online.

These online programs often offer accelerated formats and flexible schedules, making it easier for working professionals or busy students to advance their education. Considering related pathways lets you tailor your education to your career goals within the broad and growing field of STEM.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Hinchey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles