World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
66
Citations
15142
World Ranking
1430
National Ranking
84

Michael Fisher publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fisher sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 441 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael Fisher D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Fisher sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The characteristics of the turbulence in the mixing region of a round jet

    P. O. A. L. Davies;M. J. Fisher;M. J. Barratt

  • Measurements in subsonic and supersonic free jets using a laser velocimeter

    Jark C. Lau;Philip J. Morris;Michael J. Fisher

  • A Survey of Concurrent METATEM - the Language and its Applications

    Michael Fisher

  • Visual outcomes in children with neurofibromatosis type 1–associated optic pathway glioma following chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective analysis

    Michael J. Fisher;Michael Loguidice;David H. Gutmann;Robert Listernick

  • Jet engine noise source location: The polar correlation technique

    M.J. Fisher;M. Harper-Bourne;S.A.L. Glegg

  • Formal Specification and Verification of Autonomous Robotic Systems: A Survey

    Matt Luckcuck;Marie Farrell;Louise A. Dennis;Clare Dixon

  • Formal verification of ethical choices in autonomous systems

    Louise A. Dennis;Michael Fisher;Marija Slavkovik;Matt Webster

  • Parenchymal cell apoptosis as a signal for sinusoidal sequestration and transendothelial migration of neutrophils in murine models of endotoxin and Fas-antibody-induced liver injury

    Judy A. Lawson;Michael A. Fisher;Carol A. Simmons;Anwar Farhood

  • Clausal temporal resolution

    Michael Fisher;Clare Dixon;Martin Peim

  • Correlation measurements in a non-frozen pattern of turbulence

    M. J. Fisher;P. O. A. L. Davies

  • Model checking agentspeak

    Rafael H. Bordini;Michael Fisher;Carmen Pardavila;Michael Wooldridge

  • Verifying Multi-agent Programs by Model Checking

    Rafael H. Bordini;Michael Fisher;Willem Visser;Michael Wooldridge

  • Model checking multi-agent systems with MABLE

    Michael Wooldridge;Michael Fisher;Marc-Philippe Huget;Simon Parsons

  • Outcomes by Clinical and Molecular Features in Children With Medulloblastoma Treated With Risk-Adapted Therapy: Results of an International Phase III Trial (SJMB03)

    Amar Gajjar;Giles W Robinson;Kyle S Smith;Tong Lin

  • A resolution method for temporal logic

    Michael Fisher

  • METATEM: A Framework for Programming in Temporal Logic

    Howard Barringer;Michael Fisher;Dov M. Gabbay;Graham Gough

  • Model checking agent programming languages

    Louise A. Dennis;Michael Fisher;Matthew P. Webster;Rafael H. Bordini

  • The intrinsic structure of turbulent jets

    J.C. Lau;M.J. Fisher;H.V. Fuchs

  • Handbook of Temporal Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence

    Michael David Fisher;Dov M. Gabbay;Lluis Vila

  • The imperative future: principles of executable temporal logic

    Howard Barringer;Michael Fisher;Dov Gabbay;Richard Owens

  • Mapping the megathrust beneath the northern Gulf of Alaska using wide‐angle seismic data

    Thomas M. Brocher;Gary S. Fuis;Michael A. Fisher;George Plafker

  • On the Formal Specification and Verification of Multi-Agent Systems

    Michael Fisher;Michael J. Wooldridge

  • Upper crustal structure in Puget Lowland, Washington: Results from the 1998 Seismic Hazards Investigation in Puget Sound

    Thomas M. Brocher;Tom Parsons;Richard J. Blakely;Nikolas I. Christensen

  • The vortex-street structure of ‘turbulent’ jets. Part 1

    J. C. Lau;M. J. Fisher

  • Representing and executing agent-based systems

    Michael Fisher

  • Verifying autonomous systems

    Michael Fisher;Louise Dennis;Matt Webster

  • The influence of temperature on shock-free supersonic jet noise

    H.K. Tanna;P.D. Dean;M.J. Fisher

  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

    Farshid Amirabdollahian;Kerstin Dautenhahn;Clare Dixon;Kerstin I Eder

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger J. Packer
Roger J. Packer Children’s National Health System
David H. Gutmann
David H. Gutmann Washington University in St. Louis
Bruce R. Korf
Bruce R. Korf University of Alabama at Birmingham
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Eric Bouffet
Eric Bouffet University of Toronto
Thomas M. Brocher
Thomas M. Brocher United States Geological Survey
Amar Gajjar
Amar Gajjar St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham
Rafael H. Bordini
Rafael H. Bordini Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
Tom Parsons
Tom Parsons United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens up a wide range of career possibilities that intersect with other high-demand fields. For those looking to complement their technical expertise, related online degrees can offer flexible pathways to enhance your skillset.

For example, if you're interested in the legal or compliance aspects of technology, an accelerated paralegal certificate can be a fast way to build expertise in legal documentation and regulatory processes. Alternatively, a bookkeeping course is a practical option for learning the financial management skills valued in engineering firms and tech startups.

For those drawn to organizational operations, pursuing an online administration degree can prepare you for important roles in office management and project coordination within technology sectors. Meanwhile, an online business administration degree is a versatile choice that can help you develop leadership and strategic decision-making skills for a broad range of careers after graduation.

Exploring these pathways can help you diversify your job prospects and thrive in the dynamic world of engineering and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Fisher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles