World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John-Jules Ch. Meyer

John-Jules Ch. Meyer

Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
12231
World Ranking
3861
National Ranking
47

John-Jules Ch. Meyer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Jules Ch. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 450 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John-Jules Ch. Meyer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John-Jules Ch. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award

Overview

John-Jules Ch. Meyer is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the domain of Computer Science, with particular contributions in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The research topics covered by Meyer's work include:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic

Meyer has contributed to key publication venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Logic and Computation

Their recent papers include:

  • "A Formal Framework for Reasoning about Agents' Independence in Self-organizing Multi-agent Systems" (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A formal framework for reasoning about agents' independence in self-organizing multi-agent systems" (2025), published in Journal of Logic and Computation

John-Jules Ch. Meyer frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Jieting Luo
  • Beishui Liao

Best Publications

  • Epistemic logic for AI and computer science

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer;Wiebe van der Hoek

  • A different approach to deontic logic: deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic.

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Agent Programming in 3APL

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. De Boer;Wiebe Van Der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Deontic logic in computer science: normative system specification

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer;Roel J. Wieringa

  • A Programming Language for Cognitive Agents: Goal Directed 3APL

    Mehdi Dastani;M. Birna van Riemsdijk;Frank Dignum;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Intelligent Agents VIII

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer;Milind Tambe

  • Agent Programming with Declarative Goals

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. de Boer;Wiebe van der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Computational Modeling of Emotion: Toward Improving the Inter- and Intradisciplinary Exchange

    Rainer Reisenzein;Eva Hudlicka;Mehdi Dastani;Jonathan Gratch

  • Reasoning about emotional agents

    John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Boolean games

    Paul Harrenstein;Wiebe van der Hoek;John-Jules Meyer;Cees Witteveen

  • Programming Multi-Agent Systems in 3APL

    Mehdi Dastani;M. van Birna Riemsdijk;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Adaptive emotional expression in robot-child interaction

    Myrthe Tielman;Mark Neerincx;John-Jules Meyer;Rosemarijn Looije

  • Designing a Deontic Logic of Deadlines

    Jan M. Broersen;Frank Dignum;Virginia Dignum;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Normative Multi-agent Programs and Their Logics

    Mehdi Dastani;Davide Grossi;John-Jules Ch. Meyer;Nick Tinnemeier

  • Specifying dynamic and deonitc integrity constraints

    R. Wieringa;J.-J. Meyer;H. Weigand

  • An Organization-oriented Model for Agent Societies

    V. Dignum;J-J. Meyer;H. Weigand;F. Dignum

  • Formal Semantics for an Abstract Agent Programming Language

    Koen V. Hindriks;Frank S. de Boer;Wiebe van der Hoek;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Formal Specification of Interaction in Agent Societies

    Virginia Dignum;John-Jules Ch. Meyer;Frank Dignum;Hans Weigand

  • An Integrated Modal Approach to Rational Agents

    Wiebe van der Hoek;Bernd van Linder;John-Jules Ch. Meyer

  • Programming agent deliberation: an approach illustrated using the 3APL language

    Mehdi Dastani;Frank de Boer;Frank Dignum;John-Jules Meyer

  • ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HEALTH CARE

    John Jules Ch Meyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Mehdi Dastani
Mehdi Dastani Utrecht University
Frank Dignum
Frank Dignum Umeå University
Wiebe van der Hoek
Wiebe van der Hoek University of Liverpool
Koen V. Hindriks
Koen V. Hindriks Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jamal Bentahar
Jamal Bentahar Concordia University
Bart Verheij
Bart Verheij University of Groningen
Leendert van der Torre
Leendert van der Torre University of Luxembourg
Jan Treur
Jan Treur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Virginia Dignum
Virginia Dignum Umeå University
Roel Wieringa
Roel Wieringa University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Computer Science is just one part of the ever-evolving tech landscape. Many students consider broadening their expertise with other in-demand fields. For example, those interested in applied technology may look into the best online electrical engineering programs USA, which combine engineering skills with digital problem-solving.

Quick upskilling is also an option. There are several easy certifications to get that boost your resume and can lead directly to well-paying roles. For those wanting to advance rapidly, check out the fastest masters degree online options that can be completed in as little as one year.

Still unsure which graduate path to choose? Explore insights on what masters program should I do to see the most valuable and in-demand degrees. Each of these pathways opens new doors in technology, engineering, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing John-Jules Ch. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles