World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jamal Bentahar

Jamal Bentahar

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5617
World Ranking
11252
National Ranking
443

Jamal Bentahar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Bentahar sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 302 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jamal Bentahar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jamal Bentahar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A comprehensive survey on applications of transformers for deep learning tasks

    Unknown

  • Federated against the cold: A trust-based federated learning approach to counter the cold start problem in recommendation systems

    Unknown

  • A survey on trust and reputation models for Web services

    Omar Abdel Wahab;Jamal Bentahar;Hadi Otrok;Azzam Mourad

  • Deep and reinforcement learning for automated task scheduling in large-scale cloud computing systems

    Gaith Rjoub;Jamal Bentahar;Omar Abdel Wahab;Ahmed Saleh Bataineh

  • A taxonomy of argumentation models used for knowledge representation

    Jamal Bentahar;Bernard Moulin;Micheline Bélanger

  • AI, Blockchain, and Vehicular Edge Computing for Smart and Secure IoV: Challenges and Directions

    Ahmad Hammoud;Hani Sami;Azzam Mourad;Hadi Otrok

  • Optimal Load Distribution for the Detection of VM-Based DDoS Attacks in the Cloud

    Omar Abdel Wahab;Jamal Bentahar;Hadi Otrok;Azzam Mourad

  • CEAP: SVM-based intelligent detection model for clustered vehicular ad hoc networks

    Omar Abdel Wahab;Azzam Mourad;Hadi Otrok;Hadi Otrok;Jamal Bentahar

  • Towards Trustworthy Multi-Cloud Services Communities: A Trust-Based Hedonic Coalitional Game

    Omar Abdel Wahab;Jamal Bentahar;Hadi Otrok;Azzam Mourad

  • CRM: An efficient trust and reputation model for agent computing

    Babak Khosravifar;Jamal Bentahar;Maziar Gomrokchi;Rafiul Alam

  • AI-Based Resource Provisioning of IoE Services in 6G: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach

    Hani Sami;Hadi Otrok;Jamal Bentahar;Azzam Mourad

  • BigTrustScheduling: Trust-aware big data task scheduling approach in cloud computing environments

    Gaith Rjoub;Jamal Bentahar;Omar Abdel Wahab

  • Demand-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Fog and Service Placement

    Hani Sami;Azzam Mourad;Hadi Otrok;Jamal Bentahar

  • An Argumentation Framework for Communities of Web Services

    J. Bentahar;Z. Maamar;D. Benslimane;P. Thiran

  • An Approach to Engineer Communities of Web Services: Concepts, architecture, operation, and deployment

    Zakaria Maamar;Sattanathan Subramanian;Philippe Thiran;Djamal Benslimane

  • Trust-driven reinforcement selection strategy for federated learning on IoT devices

    Unknown

  • A Crowd-Sensing Framework for Allocation of Time-Constrained and Location-Based Tasks

    Rebeca Estrada;Rabeb Mizouni;Hadi Otrok;Anis Ouali

  • Resource-Aware Detection and Defense System against Multi-Type Attacks in the Cloud: Repeated Bayesian Stackelberg Game

    Omar Abdel Wahab;Jamal Bentahar;Hadi Otrok;Azzam Mourad

  • Research directions in agent communication

    Amit K. Chopra;Alexander Artikis;Jamal Bentahar;Marco Colombetti

  • Trust-Augmented Deep Reinforcement Learning for Federated Learning Client Selection

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Recently Published Articles