World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
50
Citations
10843
World Ranking
5590
National Ranking
336

Peter McBurney publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter McBurney sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 287 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter McBurney D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter McBurney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter McBurney is a researcher affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom, specializing in the field of computer science. Their work primarily focuses on artificial intelligence, information systems, and computer networks and communications, alongside contributions to statistical and nonlinear physics as well as management science and operations research.

The scientist has published extensively within the subfields of artificial intelligence, with 23 publications, and information systems, accounting for eight publications. Their research also spans computer networks and communications with six papers, and they have contributed four works each in statistical and nonlinear physics and management science.

Central research topics that McBurney investigates include multi-agent systems and negotiation, blockchain technology applications and security, and span spam and phishing detection, caching and content delivery, opinion dynamics and social influence, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), as well as distributed systems and fault tolerance. These topics reflect a focus on complex systems and their security and communication protocols.

McBurney has a presence in several publication venues. Frequent venues include arXiv (Cornell University) with seven publications, Argument & Computation with two papers, and single publications in Algorithms, Computer Networks, and Royal Society Open Science.

Selected recent papers authored by or involving McBurney cover a range of topics:

  • Sybil in the Haystack: A Comprehensive Review of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms in Search of Strong Sybil Attack Resistance, 2023, Algorithms
  • Sybil attacks on identity-augmented Proof-of-Stake, 2021, Computer Networks
  • The evolution of deception, 2021, Royal Society Open Science
  • A computational model of argumentation schemes for multi-agent systems, 2021, Argument & Computation
  • Voting Over a Distributed Ledger: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, 2021, Foundations and Trends® in Microeconomics

Collaboration is a consistent aspect of McBurney's research, working frequently with Moritz Platt, Ştefan Sarkadi, Simon Parsons, Dylan Cope, and Alex Rutherford. The number of coauthored works ranges from two to four with these colleagues.

In addition to journal publications, McBurney has contributed to book literature, including a publication titled Deceptive AI released by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Argumentation-based negotiation

    Iyad Rahwan;Sarvapali D. Ramchurn;Nicholas R. Jennings;Peter Mcburney

  • Agent Technology: Enabling Next Generation Computing (A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing)

    Michael Luck;Peter McBurney;Chris Preist

  • Agent technology, Computing as Interaction: A Roadmap for Agent Based Computing

    M Luck;P McBurney;O Shehory;S Willmott

  • Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results

    Paul E. Dunne;Anthony Hunter;Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons

  • Games That Agents Play: A Formal Framework for Dialogues between Autonomous Agents

    Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons

  • Agent technology: Enabling next generation computing

    Michael Luck;Peter Mcburney;Chris Preist

  • Chance Discovery

    Peter McBurney;Yukio Ohsawa

  • A Manifesto for Agent Technology: Towards Next Generation Computing

    Michael Luck;Peter McBurney;Chris Preist

  • Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

    T Rahwan;T Michalak;N.R. Jennings;M Wooldridge

  • Computational Representation of Practical Argument

    Katie Atkinson;Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon;Peter McBurney

  • A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations

    Peter Mcburney;Rogier M. Van Eijk;Simon Parsons;Leila Amgoud

  • Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda

    Daniele Magazzeni;Peter McBurney;William Nash

  • AAAI-2002 fall symposium series

    Yukio Ohsawa;Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons;Christopher A. Miller

  • A Dialogue Game Protocol for Multi-Agent Argument over Proposals for Action

    Katie Atkinson;Trevor Bench-Capon;Peter Mcburney

  • The eightfold way of deliberation dialogue

    Peter McBurney;David Hitchcock;Simon Parsons

  • Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols

    Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons;Michael Wooldridge

  • Dialogue games for agent argumentation

    Peter McBurney;Simon Parsons

  • An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Comparison of Two Double-Auction Market Designs

    Steve Phelps;Simon Parsons;Peter Mcburney

  • Agent technology, Computing as Interaction

    Michael Luck;Peter McBurney;O. Shehory;S. Willmott

  • On the meta-logic of arguments

    Michael Wooldridge;Peter Mcburney;Simon Parsons

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Michael Luck
Michael Luck University of Sussex
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon University of Liverpool
Iyad Rahwan
Iyad Rahwan Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Tim Miller
Tim Miller University of Queensland
Simon Miles
Simon Miles King's College London
Nicholas R. Jennings
Nicholas R. Jennings Loughborough University
Andrea Omicini
Andrea Omicini University of Bologna
Enrico H. Gerding
Enrico H. Gerding University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your knowledge beyond computer science can open new doors in the tech sector. Many students explore online electrical engineering courses USA to gain skills in hardware design, circuits, and embedded systems, all of which complement programming expertise.

For those interested in quicker routes to employment, obtaining certifications for jobs can be a smart way to boost your credentials. These certifications often focus on in-demand technology or IT specializations, providing an edge in the job market.

If you are looking to deepen your knowledge without spending years in school, there are options to pursue quick masters degrees online. These streamlined programs cover key topics at an accelerated pace, helping you advance your career sooner.

As you plan your next steps, consider pursuing one of the most valuable masters degrees. These programs are in high demand, leading to strong job prospects and competitive salaries across the technology and engineering sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Peter McBurney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles