World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
8354
World Ranking
6867
National Ranking
148

Leila Amgoud publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leila Amgoud sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Leila Amgoud D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leila Amgoud sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leila Amgoud is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research is primarily situated within the broad field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence. Contributions also span Computational Theory and Mathematics, Sociology and Political Science, and Information Systems.

Their scholarly work addresses several main topics including:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic

Amgoud's publication record includes multiple recent papers across prestigious venues, highlighting a focus on argumentation, explainability, and semantics in AI:

  • "Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: Foundations and semantics" (2021), published in Artificial Intelligence
  • "Axiomatic Foundations of Explainability" (2022), published in the Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Explaining black-box classifiers: Properties and functions" (2023), published in the International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • "A General Setting for Gradual Semantics Dealing with Similarity" (2021), published in the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Explaining Black-box Classification Models with Arguments" (2021), published in the 2021 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI)

The venues in which Amgoud frequently publishes include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Collaboration is an important aspect of Amgoud's research, with regular co-authors comprising:

  • Víctor David
  • Martin Cooper
  • Srdjan Vesić
  • Vivien Beuselinck
  • Dragan Doder

Best Publications

  • On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms

    Martin Caminada;Leila Amgoud

  • A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments

    Leila Amgoud;Claudette Cayrol

  • Using arguments for making and explaining decisions

    Leila Amgoud;Henri Prade

  • Modelling dialogues using argumentation

    L. Amgoud;N. Maudet;S. Parsons

  • Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks

    Leila Amgoud;Claudette Cayrol

  • Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation

    Leila Amgoud;Simon Parsons;Nicolas Maudet

  • On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

    L. Amgoud;C. Cayrol;M. C. Lagasquie-Schiex;P. Livet

  • Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues

    Simon Parsons;Michael J. Wooldridge;Leila Amgoud

  • A Dialogue Game Protocol for Agent Purchase Negotiations

    Peter Mcburney;Rogier M. Van Eijk;Simon Parsons;Leila Amgoud

  • On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation

    Leila Amgoud;Claudette Cayrol

  • Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks

    Leila Amgoud;Jonathan Ben-Naim

  • A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation

    Leila Amgoud;Yannis Dimopoulos;Pavlos Moraitis

  • Agent dialogues with conflicting preferences

    Leila Amgoud;Simon Parsons

  • An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning

    Iyad Rahwan;Leila Amgoud

  • An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues

    Simon Parsons;Michael Wooldridge;Leila Amgoud

  • An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision

    Leila Amgoud;Jean-Francois Bonnefon;Henri Prade

  • Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks

    Leila Amgoud;Srdjan Vesic

  • Strategical considerations for negotiating agents

    Leila Amgoud;Souhila Kaci

  • A new approach for preference-based argumentation frameworks

    Leila Amgoud;Srdjan Vesic

  • On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues

    Simon Parsons;Michael Wooldridge;Leila Amgoud

Frequent Co-Authors

Henri Prade
Henri Prade Paul Sabatier University
Simon Parsons
Simon Parsons University of Lincoln
Nicolas Maudet
Nicolas Maudet Sorbonne University
Mark d'Inverno
Mark d'Inverno Goldsmiths University of London
Carles Sierra
Carles Sierra Spanish National Research Council
Anthony Hunter
Anthony Hunter University College London
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Iyad Rahwan
Iyad Rahwan Max Planck Institute for Human Development
V. S. Subrahmanian
V. S. Subrahmanian Dartmouth College
Antonis C. Kakas
Antonis C. Kakas University of Cyprus

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education is a practical way to start your tech career. Today, many students are turning to the best online degree programs for a flexible, accredited learning experience that fits their schedules.

Computer Science opens up several career pathways. If you’re interested in creative technology, check out video game design programs for skills in digital art, storytelling, and game software development.

For those drawn to security, an online master’s in cybersecurity is increasingly in demand. Learn more about reputable options in cybersecurity masters online to protect digital information and combat cyber threats.

Computer Science knowledge also benefits other industries. For example, an online construction management degree blends technology with project management—a great fit for tech-minded leaders in construction.

No matter your focus, online degrees offer diverse routes to a rewarding career in technology and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Leila Amgoud

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles